📋

Key Facts

  • The developer works as a backend developer for a wholesale and retail online retailer of non-food goods.
  • Previous keyboard experience includes 60-75% optical and low-profile mechanical keyboards from NuPhy and Keychron.
  • The transition to split keyboards was motivated by benefits for the wrists.
  • Research into split keyboards covered size, model, firmware, and functionality.

Quick Summary

The search for the ideal typing instrument is a common struggle for software professionals. One backend developer working at a large online retailer of non-food goods shared their personal journey through the keyboard market. Because they spend the majority of their working hours at a computer, they purchased and swapped keyboards more frequently than the average user, aiming to find the ultimate in comfort.

Their journey began with standard heavy full-size membrane and mechanical keyboards from various manufacturers. Over time, the setup evolved to 60-75% optical and low-profile mechanical keyboards, specifically NuPhy and Keychron models. Eventually, the focus shifted to ortholinear split keyboards after reading about their advantages for wrist health. This required significant research into sizing, models, and firmware.

The Heavyweights: Early Keyboard Choices

The developer's initial setup consisted of heavy full-size keyboards. These included both membrane and mechanical varieties sourced from a wide range of manufacturers. At this stage, the priority was likely standard functionality rather than ergonomic optimization.

Despite trying different brands, the form factor remained traditional. These keyboards occupied significant desk space. The transition away from this form factor marked the first step toward a more streamlined workflow.

The Compact Transition 🚀

Following the full-size era, the developer moved to more compact form factors. The new standard became 60-75% keyboards. These boards sacrifice the numpad and often the function row to save desk space and bring the mouse closer to the body.

Along with the size change came a switch in switch technology. The developer utilized optical switches and low-profile mechanical switches. The specific brands highlighted during this period were:

  • NuPhy (known for low-profile designs)
  • Keychron (known for versatile mechanical options)

These keyboards offered a cleaner aesthetic and were easier to transport, but the search for the perfect typing feel continued.

The Ergonomic Awakening 🧬

A pivotal moment occurred when the developer encountered articles discussing ortholinear split keyboards. Unlike traditional keyboards where keys are staggered, ortholinear layouts align keys in straight columns. Split designs separate the keyboard into two halves.

The articles highlighted specific advantages over standard keyboards, particularly regarding wrist health. The developer noted that these benefits applied specifically to the wrists. This discovery happened roughly 1-2 years ago, a time when the market for these specialized keyboards was expanding rapidly.

Navigating the Market 📊

When the developer began looking into split keyboards, the variety was overwhelming. They described the market as having an enormous amount of variations. To make an informed decision, a period of intense research was required.

The research focused on several critical factors:

  • Size/Dimension: Determining the physical footprint.
  • Model: Selecting the specific hardware revision.
  • Firmware: Choosing the software that runs the board (often custom).
  • Functionality: Ensuring all necessary features were present.

With these parameters set, the developer noted that the process "took off," implying a deep immersion into the hobby of custom keyboard building.