Venezuela Rebukes US Claims on Oil Supply

On January 7, 2026, Venezuela issued a sharp diplomatic response to statements made by Donald Trump. The US President claimed that Washington was 'in command' of Venezuela and that the nation would provide up to 50 million barrels of oil to the United States. These comments prompted an immediate rebuttal from Venezuelan Interim President Delcy Cabello.

Cabello rejected the premise of US oversight over Venezuelan governance. She asserted that the Venezuelan government is the sole entity directing the nation's future. The dispute centers on the control of Venezuela's natural resources and the political authority of its leadership.

US President Donald Trump made headlines on January 7, 2026, with a series of assertions regarding the geopolitical status of Venezuela. During his statements, Trump claimed that Washington was effectively 'in command' of the South American nation. Furthermore, he projected a significant transfer of energy resources, suggesting that Venezuela would be 'giving' or 'remetting' between 40 and 50 million barrels of oil to the United States.

The rhetoric implies a level of influence over Caracas that suggests a shift in resource allocation. Trump's declaration positioned the United States as having substantial leverage over Venezuela's oil industry, a critical component of the Venezuelan economy. These claims set the stage for a diplomatic confrontation regarding national sovereignty and economic autonomy.

Venezuelan Interim President Delcy Cabello responded decisively to the US President's remarks. Speaking to the press, Cabello dismissed the notion of American oversight over her country. She delivered a definitive statement on the matter of governance, declaring, "Le gouvernement du Venezuela dirige notre pays, personne d’autre" (The government of Venezuela directs our country, no one else).

Cabello's response was characterized by a strong defense of national sovereignty. By stating that 'no one else' directs the country, she directly refuted Trump's claim that Washington was 'aux commandes' (in command). This exchange underscores the deep political divide between the two nations, with Venezuela firmly rejecting any external claims of authority over its internal affairs and resources.

The exchange between Washington and Caracas highlights the fragile state of relations between the two countries. The specific mention of oil volumes—up to 50 million barrels—suggests that economic resources remain a central point of contention. The Venezuelan government's refusal to acknowledge these claims indicates a continued resistance to perceived US pressure regarding its energy sector.

As of January 7, 2026, the situation remains a war of words. The Venezuelan leadership is maintaining a stance of non-compliance with the narrative presented by the US administration. The focus remains on the principle of self-determination, with Caracas asserting its right to manage its own political and economic destiny without foreign interference.

The recent statements by Donald Trump and the subsequent response from Delcy Cabello serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing geopolitical standoff in South America. While the US President claimed authority over Venezuela's actions and oil supply, the Venezuelan interim President remains steadfast in her assertion of national independence.

Ultimately, the dispute centers on the fundamental question of who governs Venezuela. According to the Venezuelan leadership, the answer is clear: the government of Venezuela directs the country, and no one else.