Key Facts
- ✓ The man was sentenced to six months of prison, suspended.
- ✓ The prosecutor had requested eight months of prison, including four months firm.
- ✓ The defendant had previously thrown an egg at Éric Zemmour.
- ✓ The incident took place in Montauban.
Quick Summary
The legal proceedings concerning an egg thrown at Jordan Bardella have concluded with a specific sentence. The court in Montauban delivered a verdict of six months of prison time, suspended. This outcome followed the arguments presented by the Procureur de la République, who had sought a total of eight months of imprisonment.
Significant details regarding the case include:
- The sentence consists of six months suspended.
- The prosecutor requested eight months total, with four months firm.
- The defendant has a history of similar actions against Éric Zemmour.
The defense and prosecution presented contrasting views on the appropriate punishment, with the court ultimately opting for a suspended sentence rather than the immediate incarceration requested by the prosecutor.
The Incident and Legal Proceedings
The case centers on an event where an individual threw an egg at Jordan Bardella. The location of the incident was Montauban, leading to local judicial involvement. The Procureur de la République took charge of the prosecution, outlining the legal consequences the accused should face.
During the trial, the prosecutor articulated a specific demand for punishment. The request was for a total sentence of eight months of imprisonment. Within this request, four months were designated as ferme, meaning they would require actual time in custody if enforced, while the remaining portion would be suspended.
Prosecution's Demands vs. Court Ruling
The Procureur de la République argued for a strict penalty based on the nature of the aggression. The demand of eight months, with four months firm, reflected the seriousness with which the prosecution viewed the attack on a public figure. This request set a high bar for the sentencing.
However, the judicial decision deviated from the prosecutor's request. The court ultimately sentenced the man to six months of prison time. Crucially, this sentence was suspended, meaning the defendant will not serve time immediately provided they do not reoffend. This represents a significant difference from the four months of firm imprisonment sought by the prosecution.
Defendant's Background
The individual sentenced in the Jordan Bardella case is not a first-time offender regarding political egg attacks. The source material indicates that this same man had previously thrown an egg at Éric Zemmour. This prior history likely played a role in the prosecutor's decision to request a harsher sentence.
The recurrence of this specific type of protest suggests a pattern of behavior. The court was aware of this history when determining the final verdict. Despite the prior incident involving Éric Zemmour, the judge opted for a suspended sentence in this instance.
Conclusion
The sentencing of the man who threw an egg at Jordan Bardella highlights the judicial response to attacks on political figures in Montauban. While the Procureur de la République pushed for a sentence including firm jail time, the court settled on a suspended sentence. This decision closes the legal loop on the incident, though the defendant's history with Éric Zemmour remains a notable part of his record.




