End of Lifetime Perks for Former PMs and Interior Ministers

The government has decided to end lifetime privileges for former prime ministers and former interior ministers. Specifically, these individuals will no longer receive chauffeur-driven vehicles or police protection for life. While described as a 'drop in the ocean' regarding total budget savings, the decision is viewed as highly symbolic. Despite the symbolic nature of the move, it is expected to generate some substantial financial savings for the state. The change marks a significant shift in the benefits provided to high-ranking former officials.

Former prime ministers and interior ministers will no longer enjoy specific lifetime privileges. The government has officially ended the provision of chauffeur-driven vehicles and police protection for these former officials. This decision removes perks that were previously guaranteed for life following their terms in office.

The removal of these benefits represents a direct change to the status of high-level former government members. By eliminating these specific privileges, the state is adjusting the support structure for its past leaders.

The decision is characterized as a goutte d'eau, or a drop in the ocean, within the broader context of budgetary economies. However, the move is described as being 'avant tout symbolique' (primarily symbolic), signaling a shift in how former leaders are treated.

Despite the small impact on the overall budget, the measure is expected to allow for substantial savings. The government views this as a necessary step, even if the immediate financial return is limited compared to the total budget.

The reform specifically targets two key groups: former prime ministers and former ministers of the interior. These positions previously held the highest level of state security and logistical support upon leaving office.

The specific perks removed include:

• Access to a chauffeur-driven vehicle for personal use.
• Continuous police protection details.

By limiting these privileges, the government is redefining the long-term responsibilities of the state toward its former executives.

This change sets a precedent for how future administrations may handle the benefits of former officials. It suggests that lifetime perks are no longer a guaranteed standard for high-ranking public servants.

The move may prompt further reviews of other state benefits provided to former officials. As the government seeks to balance the budget, other symbolic savings measures could follow this initial step.