Key Facts
- ✓ A charcuterie group and its owner sold hams with false labels.
- ✓ The products were labeled with names including 'pata negra' and 'belotta'.
- ✓ Three companies were fined a total of 1.7 million euros.
Quick Summary
A charcuterie group and its owner have been fined a total of 1.7 million euros following a ruling regarding fraudulent labeling practices. The companies involved were found to have sold hams that were not authentic to their advertised names.
The products in question were marketed with high-value designations including pata negra and belotta. Three specific companies were held accountable for this mislabeling. This case represents a significant enforcement action against food fraud within the charcuterie sector.
The Fraudulent Operation
A charcuterie group and its owner have been held accountable for selling hams with false labeling. The products were marketed using prestigious names that did not reflect the actual nature of the meat.
The specific designations used on the labels included:
- Pata negra
- Belotta
These terms are typically associated with high-quality cured ham. By using these labels incorrectly, the companies misled consumers about the product's value and origin. The practice constitutes a form of economic fraud.
Legal Consequences
The court has imposed a substantial financial penalty on the entities involved. The total fine amounts to 1.7 million euros.
This penalty was levied against three distinct companies operating within the charcuterie industry. The ruling targets the corporate entities as well as the individual owner of the group. The decision aims to deter similar fraudulent activities in the food market.
Impact on the Sector
Food labeling fraud undermines consumer trust and distorts the market for legitimate producers. The use of terms like pata negra implies a specific standard of quality that was not met.
Regulatory bodies continue to monitor the charcuterie market to prevent such deceptive practices. This case serves as a reminder of the legal risks associated with mislabeled food products. The ruling reinforces the necessity for transparency in food supply chains.




