Key Facts
- ✓ The Court of Appeal retracted specific elements of Auchan's social plan.
- ✓ The decision does not cancel the content of the plan concluded in March 2025.
- ✓ Auchan has decided to seize the Council of State.
- ✓ The ruling risks opening the door to indemnizations for employees.
Quick Summary
The Court of Appeal has retracted specific elements of the social plan for the retailer Auchan. The court's decision does not annul the content of the plan that was concluded in March 2025, but it does modify the legal standing of the agreement.
The retailer has reacted to the ruling by deciding to seize the Council of State. However, this legal development risks opening the door to indemnizations for the employees. The retailer maintains that the original plan remains valid despite the court's retraction of specific elements.
Court Ruling Details
The Court of Appeal has issued a ruling that retracts elements of the social plan for the retailer Auchan. This judicial decision is a significant development in the ongoing restructuring process for the company. The ruling addresses the plan that was concluded in March 2025.
Despite the court's action, the retailer has clarified that the decision does not cancel the content of the Plan de Sauvegarde de l'Emploi (PSE). The company maintains that the agreement reached in March remains in effect. However, the legal modification introduces uncertainty regarding the implementation of the plan.
Retailer's Legal Response
In response to the court's decision, the retailer has announced its intention to seize the Council of State. This move indicates the company's determination to challenge the ruling at the highest administrative level. The retailer is actively pursuing legal avenues to uphold the social plan established in March 2025.
The retailer's reaction highlights the complexity of the legal proceedings surrounding the social plan. By appealing to the Council of State, the company seeks to overturn or modify the Court of Appeal's retraction. This legal strategy underscores the retailer's commitment to the terms of the original agreement.
Implications for Employees
The court's decision carries potential consequences for the employees involved in the social plan. While the content of the plan remains valid, the ruling risks opening the door to indemnizations for the workers. This suggests that employees may have grounds to seek financial compensation based on the court's findings.
The possibility of indemnizations represents a significant shift in the potential outcomes for the workforce. The legal modification creates a new avenue for employees to pursue claims. The retailer faces the prospect of financial liabilities despite its assertion that the original plan stands.
Conclusion
The Court of Appeal's retraction of specific elements of Auchan's social plan marks a pivotal moment in the legal dispute. The retailer's decision to appeal to the Council of State ensures that the legal battle will continue. The ruling introduces the possibility of indemnizations for employees, adding a new dimension to the restructuring process.
As the case moves to the highest administrative court, the future of the social plan remains under scrutiny. The retailer continues to defend the validity of the March 2025 agreement, while the legal system evaluates the rights and compensations due to the workforce.




