Sergei Udaltsov Sentenced to Six Years for Terrorism Justification

The Military Court in Moscow delivered the verdict against opposition figure Sergei Udaltsov. He received a sentence of six years in a penal colony.

The legal proceedings focused on charges related to the justification of terrorism. The court's decision was based on specific actions attributed to the defendant.

Udaltsov serves as the coordinator for the 'Left Front' organization. The sentencing concludes a legal process that has drawn attention to political activism in the region.

The prosecution's case relied on events that occurred two years prior to the verdict. The charges allege that Udaltsov utilized social media to voice support for specific individuals.

These individuals were members of a Marxist circle located in Ufa. Recently, this group faced conviction for their own alleged criminal activities.

The Ufa group was found guilty of preparing for the violent seizure of power. The prosecution linked Udaltsov's online commentary to these actions, framing it as justification for their plot.

Sergei Udaltsov maintained his innocence throughout the trial. He explicitly stated that he did not admit to the guilt presented by the prosecution.

Following the announcement of the six-year sentence, Udaltsov made a severe declaration. He announced in the courtroom that he intends to start a "deadly hunger strike".

This statement underscores the intensity of his opposition to the court's findings. It signals a potential escalation in his response to the incarceration.

The case connects two distinct legal events separated by time. The first event involves Udaltsov's social media posts two years ago; the second involves the recent conviction of the Ufa group.

The court viewed the social media support as a form of justification for the violent plans later uncovered in Ufa. This legal strategy links online rhetoric with physical criminal conspiracies.

The verdict adds to the ongoing narrative regarding political opposition in Moscow. It demonstrates the legal risks associated with expressing solidarity with other activist groups.