Key Facts
- ✓ Lawyers for Live Nation and Ticketmaster filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit on January 6.
- ✓ The lawsuit was brought by the Federal Trade Commission and seven states.
- ✓ The original lawsuit was filed in September.
- ✓ The companies claim the suit is an 'egregious instance of agency overreach.'
Quick Summary
Lawyers for Live Nation and Ticketmaster have formally requested the dismissal of a lawsuit filed in September. The legal action was initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alongside seven state attorneys general. The motion to dismiss was filed on January 6, representing the companies' first official legal response to the complaint.
In their filing, the companies strongly oppose the regulatory action, describing the suit as an "egregious instance of agency overreach." This terminology suggests the defense will focus on the limits of the FTC's regulatory authority rather than the specific facts of the case. The motion seeks to have the entire case thrown out before it proceeds further in the legal system.
Legal Challenge to Regulatory Authority
The legal dispute centers on a lawsuit originally filed in September by the Federal Trade Commission and seven states. On January 6, defense lawyers for the targeted companies submitted a formal motion to dismiss the case. This document serves as the primary legal vehicle for challenging the validity of the government's claims.
The core of the defense argument is the accusation of government overstep. By labeling the suit an "egregious instance of agency overreach," the companies are attacking the legal foundation of the FTC's lawsuit. This defense strategy typically argues that a federal agency has exceeded the powers granted to it by Congress. The motion implies that the companies believe the FTC is acting outside of its jurisdiction regarding the specific conduct in question.
"egregious instance of agency overreach"
— Lawyers for Live Nation and Ticketmaster
Parties Involved
The lawsuit involves a coalition of government entities targeting major players in the live entertainment industry. The primary plaintiff is the Federal Trade Commission, the United States' primary federal agency for consumer protection and antitrust enforcement.
Joining the FTC in the legal action are attorneys general from seven states. While the specific states are not named in the available text, their involvement indicates a coordinated effort between federal and state authorities. On the defense side, the motion is filed on behalf of two closely linked entities: Live Nation, the parent entertainment company, and Ticketmaster, the ticket sales and distribution company.
Timeline of Events
The legal proceedings have moved through several key stages over the past several months. The conflict began when the government plaintiffs filed the initial lawsuit in September, though the exact date in September is not specified in the text.
Following the initial filing, the defendants took approximately three to four months to prepare their formal response. The motion to dismiss was officially filed on January 6. This timeline suggests a period of legal preparation and strategy development by the companies' legal teams before submitting their challenge to the court.
Implications and Next Steps
The filing of this motion initiates a critical phase in the legal dispute. The court must now review the arguments presented by Live Nation and Ticketmaster regarding the alleged agency overreach. A judge will decide whether to grant the dismissal, which would end the case, or deny the motion, allowing the lawsuit to proceed to discovery and potential trial.
If the motion is denied, the companies will have to answer the specific allegations made by the FTC and the seven states. The outcome of this dismissal request will set a precedent for the scope of the FTC's authority in regulating similar industry practices. Stakeholders in the entertainment and ticketing sectors are closely monitoring the case for its potential impact on future regulatory oversight.




