Key Facts
- ✓ Knesset Finance Committee panel moved to overturn Finance Minister Smotrich's order.
- ✓ The order doubled the VAT exemption on personal imports from $75 to $150.
- ✓ Likud elements led by Finance Committee chair MK Milwidsky argue the change penalizes local businesses.
Quick Summary
A Knesset Finance Committee panel has moved to overturn Finance Minister Smotrich's order doubling the VAT exemption on personal imports from $75 to $150. The move is led by Milwidsky and Likud elements.
The committee argues that the higher exemption penalizes local businesses. This is a rare legislative step to reverse a Finance Minister's tax order.
Legislative Challenge to Tax Policy
The Knesset Finance Committee has taken a rare step to challenge a decision by Finance Minister Smotrich. The panel moved to overturn an order that increased the VAT exemption on personal imports. Previously, the exemption stood at $75, but the new order aimed to double that amount to $150.
This legislative maneuver is considered unusual. It represents a direct confrontation between the committee and the Finance Ministry regarding tax policy on imported goods.
Impact on Local Businesses
The primary opposition to the increased exemption comes from Likud elements within the committee. Milwidsky, who chairs the Finance Committee, is leading the argument against the change.
The core concern is economic protectionism for domestic retailers. The argument posits that raising the tax-free threshold for personal imports makes foreign goods significantly cheaper compared to products sold by local merchants. This disparity creates an uneven playing field, potentially driving down sales for businesses operating within the country.
The Mechanics of the Dispute
The dispute centers on the specific VAT exemption applied to goods brought into the country by individuals. By doubling the limit from $75 to $150, the government intended to facilitate cheaper imports for consumers.
However, the committee's counter-movement seeks to reverse this. If successful, the threshold would return to the previous level, ensuring that a larger volume of imported goods remains subject to Value Added Tax. This would theoretically reduce the price advantage of foreign goods over domestic ones.
Conclusion
The Knesset panel's move to overturn Smotrich's order highlights a significant tension between consumer pricing benefits and the protection of local commerce. While the increased exemption offers savings for consumers purchasing goods from abroad, the committee argues the cost to local businesses is too high.
As the process moves forward, the focus will remain on the balance between facilitating international trade and sustaining the domestic market. The outcome of this legislative challenge will determine the future of the VAT exemption threshold for personal imports.




