Key Facts
- ✓ The US seized Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
- ✓ Danish MEP Henrik Dahl wrote an opinion article for Euronews.
- ✓ Dahl argues the seizure is not troubling because international law was sidelined.
- ✓ Dahl states Europeans react as if the event were unexpected.
- ✓ Dahl claims Europe pretends there was ever a truly rules-based international order.
Quick Summary
The recent US seizure of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro has sparked a critical response from European political figures. Danish MEP Henrik Dahl authored an opinion piece for Euronews addressing the situation. Dahl contends that the core issue is not the violation of international law, which he implies is a recurring event, but the reaction from Europe.
He argues that European leaders and citizens act surprised by these geopolitical maneuvers. This surprise, according to Dahl, is misplaced. It reflects a continued belief in a rules-based international system that does not truly exist. The commentary serves as a critique of European foreign policy awareness and its relationship with the US.
Dahl's Critique of European Sentiment
Henrik Dahl, a Danish Member of the European Parliament, has published an opinion article regarding the recent US actions in Venezuela. The focus of his critique is the European perception of international law. Dahl asserts that the seizure of Nicolás Maduro is not troubling because international law has been sidelined.
Instead, the troubling factor is the European reaction. Dahl notes that Europeans continue to behave as if this specific sidelining of international norms is unexpected. This perspective suggests a disconnect between European expectations and the reality of global power dynamics. The commentary highlights a specific failure in European political discourse regarding the United States.
The Myth of Rules-Based Order 🌍
The core argument presented by Henrik Dahl is that Europe must abandon a specific illusion. This illusion is the belief that there was ever a truly rules-based international order. By reacting with shock to the US seizure of Nicolás Maduro, European actors reveal their adherence to this myth.
Dahl's analysis suggests that international relations have always been governed by power dynamics rather than strict adherence to rules. The US action in Venezuela serves as a stark reminder of this reality. Consequently, Dahl argues that Europe's continued feigning of surprise is detrimental to a clear understanding of global politics.
Implications for US-Europe Relations
The actions of the US regarding Venezuela and the subsequent reaction from Europe point to underlying tensions. Henrik Dahl uses this incident to call for a more realistic approach from European leaders. If Europe stops pretending, it can formulate a foreign policy based on how the world actually works, rather than how it hopes it works.
This shift in perspective could lead to a more pragmatic relationship with the United States. It would involve acknowledging that the US acts in its own interests, sometimes outside of strict legal frameworks. For Euronews readers, Dahl's piece serves as a call to recognize the limits of international institutions in the face of superpower politics.
Conclusion
In summary, the seizure of Nicolás Maduro has highlighted a divide in perception between the US and Europe. Henrik Dahl argues that the surprise expressed by Europeans is the true anomaly. It indicates a lingering faith in a rules-based order that history suggests is largely fictional.
Until Europe aligns its expectations with the reality of international power politics, it will likely continue to be surprised by the actions of global powers. Dahl's opinion piece challenges the status quo of European diplomatic thought, urging a move toward realism over idealism.




