M
MercyNews
HomeCategoriesTrendingAbout
M
MercyNews

Your trusted source for the latest news and real-time updates from around the world.

Categories

  • Technology
  • Business
  • Science
  • Politics
  • Sports

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • DMCA / Copyright

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for daily news updates.

Mercy News aggregates and AI-enhances content from publicly available sources. We link to and credit original sources. We do not claim ownership of third-party content.

© 2025 Mercy News. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsCookiesDMCA
Home
cryptocurrency
Coinbase May Withdraw Support for CLARITY Act
cryptocurrencyPoliticseconomics

Coinbase May Withdraw Support for CLARITY Act

January 12, 2026•7 min read•1,377 words
Coinbase May Withdraw Support for CLARITY Act
Coinbase May Withdraw Support for CLARITY Act
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ Coinbase may withdraw support for the CLARITY Act if it restricts stablecoin reward programs.
  • ✓ Stablecoin rewards are a core part of Coinbase's revenue model, sharing interest income from USDC reserves.
  • ✓ The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the legislation on January 15.
  • ✓ Banking groups argue stablecoin yields could pull deposits away from traditional banks.
  • ✓ Coinbase contends restrictive regulations would push users offshore and stifle innovation.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. The Stakes for Coinbase
  3. Regulatory Clash: Banking vs. Crypto ️
  4. Legislative Timeline and Impact ⏳
  5. Conclusion

Quick Summary#

Coinbase is evaluating its position regarding the CLARITY Act as the Senate prepares to mark up the legislation. The exchange has indicated it may withdraw support if the final text imposes restrictions on stablecoin reward programs. These programs are a core component of Coinbase's revenue model, allowing the exchange to share interest income generated from USD Coin (USDC) reserves with its users.

The debate highlights a significant divide between traditional banking interests and the crypto industry. While banking groups argue that stablecoin yields threaten traditional deposits, Coinbase contends that limiting these rewards would make U.S. platforms less competitive globally. The outcome of the January 15 markup session could determine the regulatory landscape for digital assets and the future of yield-bearing products on U.S. exchanges.

The Stakes for Coinbase 🏦#

The potential withdrawal of support stems from the financial importance of stablecoin rewards to Coinbase's business operations. The exchange participates in interest income derived from the reserves backing USD Coin (USDC), a stablecoin issued by Circle. Coinbase holds a minority stake in Circle, further solidifying this relationship.

Part of the revenue generated from these reserves is utilized to offer incentives to users. Specifically, the exchange provides approximately 3.5% rewards for customers subscribed to Coinbase One. These incentives serve a strategic purpose:

  • Encouraging users to maintain USDC balances on the platform.
  • Creating a predictable revenue stream during periods of low trading volume.
  • Competing with traditional financial products offering interest.

These programs are not viewed as a minor perk by the exchange. Instead, they are integral to the company's financial health. Estimates suggest that revenue related to stablecoins may have reached around $1.3 billion in 2025. Consequently, legislative restrictions on these programs pose a direct threat to the exchange's profitability.

Regulatory Clash: Banking vs. Crypto 🏛️#

The core of the conflict lies in the classification of stablecoin rewards. The CLARITY Act aims to establish market structure rules for digital assets, defining categories such as digital commodities and payment stablecoins. However, the legislation also signals increased Congress interest in stablecoin oversight.

Traditional banking groups have raised concerns regarding these crypto-native incentives. Their argument rests on the premise that allowing yield on stablecoins could:

  • Pull deposits away from traditional banks.
  • Reduce lending capacity to households and small businesses.
  • Blur the lines between regulated banking products and unregulated crypto assets.

In contrast, Coinbase and other crypto advocates argue that treating rewards as bank interest would have negative consequences. They claim it would stifle innovation and make U.S.-based platforms less competitive against international counterparts. There is a fear that overly restrictive regulations could push users to seek services offshore, outside of U.S. regulatory reach. This tension represents the broader struggle between ensuring investor protection and maintaining viable business models for companies in the emerging sector.

Legislative Timeline and Impact ⏳#

The timing of this dispute is critical. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to review the bill shortly, with a markup session set for January 15. The provisions finalized during this process could shape the future of U.S. crypto policy for years to come.

Coinbase's potential withdrawal of support serves as both a negotiation tactic and a reflection of the critical nature of stablecoin yield programs. If the bill passes with strict limitations, the impact could be twofold:

  1. Reduced Adoption: Limiting incentives may reduce the adoption of U.S.-based platforms, slowing mainstream engagement with digital currencies.
  2. Global Competitiveness: U.S. exchanges may struggle to compete with platforms in other jurisdictions that permit yield-bearing products.

While Coinbase has not issued an official statement regarding its final decision, reports indicate that the exchange is carefully evaluating the text. The goal is to determine if it can continue offering rewards while remaining compliant with U.S. law. The outcome of the markup session will likely dictate whether Coinbase proceeds with its threat to withdraw support.

Conclusion#

The conflict between Coinbase and lawmakers over the CLARITY Act underscores the growing pains of the digital asset industry. As Congress moves to clarify market structures, the inclusion of stablecoin oversight creates friction with established business models. The exchange's reliance on stablecoin rewards highlights how deeply integrated these products are into the current crypto ecosystem.

As the January 15 markup approaches, all eyes are on the Senate Banking Committee. The decisions made in the coming days will not only determine the fate of the CLARITY Act but also set a precedent for how the United States approaches the regulation of stablecoins and the broader crypto economy. The balance between innovation, consumer protection, and financial stability remains the central challenge facing all stakeholders involved.

Original Source

Bitcoin Magazine

Originally published

January 12, 2026 at 05:42 PM

This article has been processed by AI for improved clarity, translation, and readability. We always link to and credit the original source.

View original article
#NEWS#Brian Armstrong#CLARITY Act#Coinbase#Senate#stablecoin

Share

Advertisement

Related Topics

#NEWS#Brian Armstrong#CLARITY Act#Coinbase#Senate#stablecoin

Related Articles

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofstechnology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

May 1·4 min read
YouTuber Cracks Coca-Cola's 139-Year-Old Secret Formula—Here 's the Recipelifestyle

YouTuber Cracks Coca-Cola's 139-Year-Old Secret Formula—Here 's the Recipe

Jan 12·3 min read
Elliot Page, Naomi Watts Lead ACLU Campaign for Trans Youthsociety

Elliot Page, Naomi Watts Lead ACLU Campaign for Trans Youth

Elliot Page and Naomi Watts star in a new ACLU campaign supporting transgender youth. The initiative launches ahead of Supreme Court oral arguments regarding state bans on transgender athletes.

Jan 12·3 min read
Minnesota Sues to Stop ICE ‘Invasion’politics

Minnesota Sues to Stop ICE ‘Invasion’

Jan 12·3 min read