• B., a victim of gender-based violence, had her newborn child removed by the Directorate General for Child and Adolescent Care (DGPPIA) in Catalonia.
  • Following a violent assault by her partner in May while three months pregnant, S.
  • fled her home, filed a report, and obtained a restraining order.
  • She subsequently entered an emergency center and moved to a protected apartment to recover and continue her pregnancy.

Quick Summary

S. B., a woman who fled a violent partner to protect her unborn child, faced a decision by Catalan authorities to remove custody shortly before birth. After suffering a severe beating in May, she sought safety through legal channels and protective housing.

Despite her efforts to secure a safe environment, the Dirección General de Atención a la Infancia y la Adolescencia (DGPPIA) intervened. They cited specific risk factors that led to the removal of the infant immediately following delivery.

The Escape and Recovery Process

In May, S. B. was three months pregnant when her partner subjected her to a violent physical assault. Following the incident, she fled the family home immediately. She took legal action by filing a formal report against her aggressor.

The legal system responded by granting her a order of alejamiento, or restraining order, to keep her partner away. To ensure her safety and the health of her pregnancy, she sought refuge in an emergency center. She later transitioned to a protected housing unit where she began a recovery process with psychological support.

Administrative Intervention ⚖️

Despite S. B.'s active steps toward recovery, the Dirección General de Atención a la Infancia y la Adolescencia (DGPPIA) opened an administrative file in July. The file was opened under the status of desamparo preventivo, or preventive abandonment, specifically regarding her future child.

The intervention escalated on October 30, just three weeks before her scheduled delivery. Social workers summoned S. B. to the agency's headquarters in Barcelona. During this meeting, she was informed that upon the birth of her baby, the child would be immediately removed from her care.

Reasons for Custody Removal

The authorities based their decision on several specific criteria they deemed to be factores de riesgo, or risk factors. The primary cited reason was the violence that S. B. had endured from her partner.

Additional factors included her current living arrangements. The fact that she resided in a protected housing unit and did not possess a casa propia, or her own home, were listed as negative indicators by the agency.

Current Visitation Rights

Following the birth of the child, the restrictions on S. B. have been strictly enforced. She is currently separated from her newborn infant.

The terms of the custody arrangement limit her contact significantly. She is permitted to visit her child for a duration of only one hour per week. These visits are conducted under the direct supervision of social services personnel.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the newborn removed from S. B.?

The Directorate General for Child and Adolescent Care cited risk factors including the violence S. B. suffered, her residence in a protected housing unit, and her lack of a permanent home.

What happened to S. B. before the birth?

After a violent assault in May, S. B. reported the crime, obtained a restraining order, and moved into an emergency center and later a protected apartment to recover and continue her pregnancy.