Anker Nano 45W Charger Loses Key Feature on Android

Anker has unveiled a new Nano 45W USB-C charger at CES 2026, featuring innovative design improvements but with a notable limitation for Android users. The compact charger includes a clever foldable plug mechanism and integrated USB-C cable.

While the device offers 45W power delivery for most devices, it loses its highest charging speed when connected to Android phones. The charger drops from 65W to 45W output, which may impact charging times for compatible Android devices. This limitation represents a significant trade-off for users who prioritize fast charging speeds.

The new Nano charger continues Anker's focus on portability and convenience, but the Android-specific power reduction could affect purchasing decisions for mobile users seeking maximum charging performance.

Anker launched the new Nano 45W USB-C charger at CES 2026, introducing several clever design features aimed at improving portability and user convenience. The charger represents the latest iteration in Anker's popular Nano series, known for compact power solutions.

The standout feature is the foldable plug design, which allows the charger to maintain a smaller footprint when not in use. This mechanism helps protect the prongs during transport and makes the device easier to store in pockets or bags. Additionally, the charger includes a built-in USB-C cable, eliminating the need for users to carry separate cables.

These design choices reflect Anker's ongoing commitment to creating travel-friendly power accessories. The integrated cable reduces cable clutter and ensures users always have a charging cable available. The compact form factor makes it particularly suitable for:

• Frequent travelers
• Mobile professionals
• Users seeking minimal carry-on items

The Nano 45W charger provides 45W power delivery through its integrated USB-C cable and port. This power output is sufficient for charging most smartphones, tablets, and some laptops. However, the charging speed varies depending on the connected device.

When paired with Android phones, the charger operates at reduced capacity. The device loses its 65W maximum output capability and instead delivers only 45W. This reduction in power delivery means Android users will experience slower charging speeds compared to what the charger can provide to other devices.

The limitation appears to be specific to Android device compatibility. For other devices such as tablets, laptops, or iOS devices, the charger maintains its standard 45W output. This discrepancy creates an uneven charging experience across different device ecosystems.

The most significant drawback of the new Nano 45W charger is its performance limitation with Android devices. Users connecting Android phones will notice the charger loses its biggest feature - the ability to deliver higher wattage charging.

This limitation is particularly relevant for users of high-end Android smartphones that support fast charging protocols. The reduced 45W output may result in longer charging times compared to chargers that can deliver the full 65W capability. For users who have invested in fast-charging Android devices, this represents a notable compromise.

The Android-specific limitation raises questions about compatibility standards and power negotiation between the charger and device. It suggests that the charger's maximum 65W output may be dependent on specific charging protocols or device handshakes that Android devices cannot provide.

The Nano 45W charger enters a competitive market of compact USB-C chargers with specific advantages and limitations. The foldable plug and integrated cable provide genuine convenience benefits, but the Android charging limitation may deter some potential buyers.

Users considering this charger should evaluate their primary device ecosystem. Android users who prioritize maximum charging speeds may need to look for alternative solutions that maintain full power delivery. However, users with mixed device environments or those who value portability over absolute charging speed may still find value in the product.

The charger's specifications suggest it remains viable for:

• Tablet charging
• Laptop maintenance power
• Non-Android smartphone charging

Ultimately, the device represents a trade-off between innovative design features and device-specific performance limitations. The clever plug mechanism and integrated cable address real portability needs, but the Android power reduction represents a significant consideration for mobile users.