AI Agents Assigned Zodiac Personalities in Experiment

A novel experiment has been conducted to explore moral dilemmas through the lens of artificial intelligence. The project involved creating 12 AI agents, each assigned a distinct zodiac personality. The creator emphasized that this was a fun game and not an endorsement of astrological beliefs. By using the same underlying large language model (LLM) with different personality prompts, the experiment aimed to see how varied personas would approach complex ethical questions. This approach isolates the variable of personality prompting to observe its effect on AI-generated responses.

The concept was shared on a major technology news aggregation site, where it received positive feedback from the community. The project demonstrates a creative use of existing LLM technology to simulate diverse human-like perspectives. It serves as a unique method for engaging friends in philosophical discussions and testing the boundaries of AI role-playing capabilities. The experiment highlights the growing trend of using AI for entertainment and social interaction beyond standard utility functions.

The core of the project lies in its methodology. The creator utilized a single LLM to power all 12 agents, ensuring that the base model remained constant. The only variable introduced was the personality prompt corresponding to one of the 12 zodiac signs. This controlled environment allows for a direct comparison of how specific personality traits influence the AI's reasoning and output when faced with moral dilemmas. The project was designed as an interactive game for friends to play together.

The experiment was shared publicly, inviting others to observe the results. It received 5 points and generated 2 comments on the platform where it was posted. The creator explicitly stated that the project was a "fun game" and clarified that they do not personally believe in zodiac signs. This distinction is crucial, framing the project as a technological exploration rather than a belief-based study.

The technical approach relies on prompt engineering to create distinct AI personas. By feeding the LLM a specific prompt for each zodiac sign, the system generates responses that align with the associated traits. For example, a prompt for a 'Leo' agent might emphasize confidence and leadership, while a 'Pisces' prompt might focus on empathy and intuition. This technique showcases the flexibility of modern LLMs in adopting and maintaining complex character roles during conversations.

The use of a single LLM for all agents is a significant detail. It confirms that any differences in the agents' responses are attributable to the personality prompts, not to different underlying models or training data. This method provides a consistent baseline for evaluating how much influence a simple text prompt can have on the behavior of a sophisticated AI system. The project serves as a practical demonstration of AI customization for specific applications.

The project was introduced on January 11, 2026, on a platform known for technology and programming discussions. The positive reception, indicated by the points and comments, suggests an interest in the community for creative applications of AI. Such experiments contribute to the broader conversation about AI ethics, personality simulation, and the potential for AI to serve as a tool for social and philosophical exploration. The game format makes complex topics accessible and engaging for a wider audience.

The primary purpose of the experiment is to facilitate discussions on moral dilemmas. By presenting a problem to 12 different AI "personalities," users can see a wide spectrum of potential solutions and ethical reasoning. This can be a valuable exercise in understanding different perspectives and the complexities of moral decision-making. The project stands as an example of how AI can be used for more than just data processing—it can be a partner in creative and intellectual endeavors.