Users Sue Roskomnadzor Over Messenger Call Blocks

Users of WhatsApp and Telegram have filed a lawsuit against Roskomnadzor and the Ministry of Digital Development. The legal action centers on the recent blocking of voice calling features within these messaging applications.

The plaintiffs assert that these regulatory actions violate their constitutional rights. The lawsuit represents a direct challenge to the authority of government agencies to restrict communication features on popular digital platforms used by millions of citizens.

A group of users has formally petitioned the court regarding the restrictions placed on WhatsApp and Telegram. The lawsuit targets two major government entities: Roskomnadzor and the Ministry of Digital Development. The plaintiffs contend that the agencies' decision to block voice calls infringes upon their fundamental rights.

The legal filing specifically addresses the technical measures that prevent users from making calls through these apps. By blocking these features, the regulatory bodies are accused of overstepping their authority and limiting essential communication methods.

The core argument presented in the lawsuit is the violation of constitutional rights. The users believe that the government's interference with their ability to communicate freely via WhatsApp and Telegram is unlawful. The plaintiffs are seeking legal recourse to restore full functionality to the messaging apps.

This legal challenge underscores the growing conflict between state regulation and digital freedom. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how communication tools are regulated in the future.

The lawsuit places Roskomnadzor and the Ministry of Digital Development in a defensive position regarding their recent policies. The agencies have yet to issue a detailed public statement regarding the specific claims made in the lawsuit. However, the legal pressure forces a direct confrontation over the justification for blocking voice calls.

The regulatory bodies face scrutiny over the scope of their powers. The plaintiffs argue that the blocking of calls is not a justified regulatory measure but an infringement on daily life and business communications.