Julio Iglesias Accused of Sexual Harassment by Former Staff

An investigation published by Univision in partnership with elDiario.es reveals serious accusations against singer Julio Iglesias. Two former employees claim they were victims of sexual abuse and humiliation while working at the artist's mansions located in the Dominican Republic and the Bahamas.

Other employees described an environment marked by isolation and strict control. One employee, identified as Rebeca, reported sexual harassment, physical assaults, and insults, living under severe rules with restricted outings and prohibited contact with colleagues. Another former employee, Laura, a Venezuelan physiotherapist, reported invasive behavior and pressure for intimate involvement without consent.

The investigation also indicates that female employees were subjected to gynecological exams, pregnancy tests, and HIV tests. These practices are considered gender discrimination and are illegal under International Labour Organization standards and Dominican law. Julio Iglesias did not respond to contact attempts, though an assistant denied the accusations.

Two former employees have publicly accused singer Julio Iglesias of sexual abuse and humiliation. The accusations stem from an investigation conducted by Univision and the Spanish portal elDiario.es. The women allege that the abuse took place while they were employed at the artist's mansions in the Dominican Republic and the Bahamas.

According to the report, the working environment was characterized by isolation and rigid control. Other employees interviewed by journalists described a setting where staff members were cut off from the outside world. The allegations detail a pattern of behavior that allegedly created a hostile and restrictive atmosphere for those living and working in the artist's homes.

The investigation highlights specific claims made by two women who worked in different capacities for the singer. Their accounts suggest a systematic failure to respect professional boundaries and personal autonomy within the household staff.

One of the former employees, identified by the pseudonym Rebeca, worked as a domestic worker. She is a young Dominican woman who reported suffering from sexual harassment, physical aggression, and insults. Rebeca stated that she lived under severe regulations, including restricted movement and a ban on maintaining contact with colleagues.

Another former employee, identified as Laura, is a Venezuelan physiotherapist. She reported facing invasive behavior during work sessions. According to her account, Iglesias crossed professional boundaries and pressured her for intimate involvement without her consent. These allegations point to a misuse of power dynamics between the employer and the employee.

Both accounts describe a workplace where personal limits were disregarded. The report suggests that these incidents were not isolated but part of a broader pattern of alleged misconduct occurring within the artist's private residences.

Beyond the testimony of abuse, the investigation reveals that female employees were subjected to specific medical procedures. Staff members were reportedly required to undergo gynecological exams, pregnancy tests, and HIV tests.

According to the Organisation of International Labour (OIT) and conventions ratified by the Dominican Republic, these practices constitute gender discrimination. They are illegal both during the hiring process and throughout the employment relationship. Subjecting employees to such tests violates fundamental labor rights and privacy protections.

Journalists involved in the investigation claim to have accessed documents, messages, call records, and medical exams to support these findings. Close friends and psychologists consulted for the report confirmed they were aware of the allegations at the time the events occurred.

Julio Iglesias has not responded to contact attempts made by the media outlets conducting the investigation. The report indicates that the singer did not provide a statement regarding the specific allegations made by his former employees.

However, an assistant mentioned by the victims denied the accusations. The assistant described the claims as "lies" and characterized the singer as "a great gentleman and very respectful with all women."

The denial stands in contrast to the detailed accounts provided by the former employees and the supporting documentation allegedly obtained by the journalists. The situation remains unresolved as the public awaits further official responses.