M
MercyNews
Home
Back
ActionAid repensa patrocínio infantil
Society

ActionAid repensa patrocínio infantil

The Guardian5h ago
3 min de leitura
📋

Fatos Principais

  • Os novos co-presidentes da ActionAid UK, Taahra Ghazi e Hannah Bond, lançaram um plano para descolonizar o trabalho da organização.
  • A instituição está repensando seu esquema tradicional de patrocínio infantil, que foi lançado em 1972.
  • O modelo original se concentrava em encontrar patrocinadores para crianças em idade escolar na Índia e no Quênia.
  • A nova liderança argumenta que o patrocínio tradicional pode carregar tons racializados e paternalistas.
  • O objetivo é mudar da ajuda baseada em simpatia para o financiamento de base a longo prazo e a solidariedade global.
  • A ActionAid visa fomentar parcerias com movimentos globais em vez de focar na seleção individual de crianças.

Resumo Rápido

ActionAid UK está empreendendo uma mudança estratégica significativa, afastando-se de seu modelo tradicional de patrocínio infantil como parte de um esforço mais amplo para descolonizar suas operações. As novas co-diretoras executivas da instituição, Taahra Ghazi e Hannah Bond, anunciaram este plano transformador ao lançarem sua co-liderança este mês.

A iniciativa visa mudar fundamentalmente como a organização aborda a ajuda internacional. Em vez de manter a prática de longa data de permitir que doadores individuais selecionem crianças específicas para apoiar, a nova liderança defende um modelo construído sobre parceria e solidariedade. Essa mudança sinaliza uma reavaliação crítica dos métodos que estavam em vigor desde a fundação da instituição.

O Contexto Histórico

ActionAid foi fundada em 1972 com uma missão centrada na educação. O modelo inicial da organização envolvia encontrar patrocinadores para crianças em idade escolar na Índia e no Quênia, um método que se tornou uma pedra angular da captação de recursos para o desenvolvimento internacional por décadas. Essa abordagem permitia que doadores de nações mais ricas formassem uma conexão direta e pessoal com uma criança em um país em desenvolvimento.

No entanto, os novos co-presidentes estão agora questionando o impacto de longo prazo e as narrativas subjacentes desse modelo. As origens da instituição em 1972 estabeleceram uma estrutura que priorizava a simpatia individual. A liderança atual acredita que essa estrutura exige uma transformação fundamental para se alinhar com as compreensões modernas de um trabalho de desenvolvimento eficaz e equitativo.

O modelo histórico dependia de uma dinâmica específica entre doador e beneficiário. A nova visão busca desmantelar essa hierarquia, movendo-se para um sistema onde o apoio é direcionado a comunidades e movimentos de base em vez da seleção individual.

"Esquemas de patrocínio infantil que permitem que doadores escolham crianças para apoiar em países pobres podem carregar tons racializados, paternalistas e precisam ser transformados."

— Taahra Ghazi e Hannah Bond, Co-Diretoras Executivas, ActionAid UK

Crítica ao Patrocínio Tradicional

Os novos co-presidentes identificaram explicitamente os danos potenciais embutidos nos esquemas tradicionais de patrocínio infantil. Eles argumentam que sistemas que permitem que doadores escolham crianças para apoiar em países pobres podem perpetuar dinâmicas prejudiciais. Essas dinâmicas são descritas como carregando tons racializados e paternalistas, o que pode reforçar estruturas de poder desiguais entre o Norte Global e o Sul Global.

A crítica se concentra na narrativa da simpatia em vez da solidariedade. Quando um doador seleciona uma criança, a relação é frequentemente enquadrada através de uma lente de caridade e pena. Isso pode, inadvertidamente, retirar a agência das comunidades sendo apoiadas e centralizar os sentimentos do doador sobre as necessidades reais da comunidade.

Esquemas de patrocínio infantil que permitem que doadores escolham crianças para apoiar em países pobres podem carregar tons racializados, paternalistas e precisam ser transformados.

O objetivo é ir além dessas narrativas problemáticas. Ao mudar o foco, a ActionAid visa fomentar um senso de humanidade compartilhada e respeito mútuo. Isso envolve reconhecer a expertise e a liderança já presentes nas comunidades que eles servem, em vez de posicionar doadores externos como os principais agentes de mudança.

Uma Nova Visão para a Ajuda 🌍

Taahra Ghazi e Hannah Bond estão defendendo uma nova direção centrada no financiamento de base a longo prazo. Em vez de direcionar fundos para crianças individuais, a organização planeja canalizar recursos para iniciativas lideradas pela comunidade e movimentos locais. Essa abordagem é projetada para criar mudanças sustentáveis e sistêmicas que beneficiem comunidades inteiras.

A mudança é enquadrada como uma transição de um modelo de simpatia para um de solidariedade. Solidariedade implica uma parceria onde organizações externas apoiam esforços locais em vez de ditá-los. Isso está alinhado com movimentos globais crescentes que defendem a descolonização da ajuda e a redistribuição do poder para atores locais.

  • Redirecionar fundos para organizações de base
  • Apoiar projetos de desenvolvimento liderados pela comunidade
  • Construir parcerias com movimentos locais
  • Mudar as dinâmicas de poder na ajuda internacional

Essa nova visão exige uma revisão completa das estratégias operacionais e de captação de recursos. A organização deve agora comunicar o valor da ação coletiva e do investimento sistêmico para sua base de doadores, afastando-se da narrativa emocionalmente atraente, mas potencialmente problemática, de salvar uma única criança.

Implicações para o Setor

A decisão da ActionAid representa um momento significativo para o setor mais amplo de desenvolvimento internacional. Como uma grande instituição de caridade fundada no modelo de patrocínio infantil, sua mudança de curso pode influenciar outras organizações a reexaminar suas próprias práticas. A movimentação destaca um consenso crescente de que os modelos tradicionais de ajuda precisam de uma revisão crítica.

A transição não será sem desafios. Mudar um modelo de captação de recursos profundamente arraigado requer uma comunicação cuidadosa com patrocinadores e partes interessadas existentes. A organização deve demonstrar que o novo modelo, mais abstrato, de financiamento comunitário, pode ser tão eficaz e impactante quanto a conexão pessoal do patrocínio infantil.

Ultimamente, essa mudança coloca a ActionAid UK na vanguarda de um movimento em direção a práticas de desenvolvimento mais éticas e equitativas. Ao abordar os legados coloniais dentro da indústria da ajuda, a instituição se posiciona como uma líder na criação de um futuro onde as parcerias globais são construídas sobre o respeito e o poder compartilhado.

Olhando para o Futuro

A liderança de Taahra Ghazi e Hannah Bond marca uma nova era para a ActionAid, uma definida pela introspecção e mudança estrutural. Seu compromisso em descolonizar o trabalho da organização é um passo ousado que desafia o status quo da ajuda internacional. O foco está agora na construção de um modelo sustentável que respeite a dignidade e a agência de todas as comunidades envolvidas.

À medida que o plano se desenrola, o setor de desenvolvimento estará observando de perto. O sucesso dessa transição pode fornecer um modelo para outras instituições de caridade que buscam modernizar suas abordagens. Isso sublinha uma evolução crítica em como pensamos sobre a responsabilidade global e a mecânica do apoio.

A jornada do patrocínio infantil de 1972 até o foco atual na solidariedade de base ilustra uma transformação profunda. É uma mudança em direção a um modelo de ajuda

#Global development#Aid#Humanitarian response#Charities#Charitable giving#Society#Feminism#World news#Africa#Americas#Asia Pacific

Continue scrolling for more

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas
Technology

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas

A inteligência artificial está se tornando uma realidade na matemática. Modelos de aprendizado de máquina agora geram teoremas originais, forçando uma reavaliação da pesquisa e do ensino.

Just now
4 min
342
Read Article
Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.
Sports

Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.

Big time football — like this month's college football championship — is the most dominant force in American culture. It won't always be that way, writer Chuck Klosterman argues in his new book. Set Number: X164821 TK1 Are you ready for some football? Trick question: America is always ready for more football. It's an appetite without end. But writer Chuck Klosterman, who just devoted a book to the sport, says football's dominance will ultimately be its undoing. The notion that football is the biggest force in American culture and entertainment is so ingrained and obvious that it almost seems like something not worth mentioning. Chuck Klosterman feels otherwise: The pop culture writer just devoted an entire book to the sport, and its meaning and importance. But Klosterman also argues that football won't always be the main thing — and that its overwhelming size and scale will be the thing that eventually undermines it. I talked to Klosterman about all of that, as well as topics like the impact of video games on the sport, and why he thinks paying college football players is good for now, and really damaging in the long run. You can hear our entire conversation on my Channels podcast. What follows are edited excerpts from our chat. Peter Kafka: What is the point of a book called "Football" in 2026? Chuck Klosterman: I have been obsessed with sports and football my entire life. And probably 20 years ago, I made an unspoken, abstract decision — at some point, I want to do a book that's just about sports. My initial idea was that it was going to be about basketball, but I realized that's crazy: If you're writing about something that's part of the culture, football is the sport. It's the only one. If someone said to you, "Explain the last half of the 20th century through some idea, some metaphor," football is the thing to pick. It might not be the case for the 21st century, but it is for the end of the 20th century. And it is for the world we live in right now. One of the big changes in sports — and definitely in football — recently is the legalization of sports betting. It's omnipresent. You seem ambivalent-to-positive about it, which is not where I thought you'd end up. CHUCK: Do I think that gambling in this legalized way is bad for society? I would say probably, for all of the predictable reasons — particularly because it's on your phone and you've put your [financial information] in, so the money does not seem real. Even if it was just a situation where you had to feed dollar bills into it, everything would change. You're taking something that's addictive for some people and marrying it to your phone, which is also addictive for some people. It seems like an obvious way to get in trouble. CHUCK: But for football, it is good. Because it adds a different context for conversation about it. When I have a conversation with other dads, we'll talk about sports a lot, and then there'll be this other conversation. About gambling. We're still technically talking about football, but this is a whole different thing. It has a different context, a different meaning. It says more about the person. Some could argue that it's a weird argument for gambling being good. But if we look at football as a form of entertainment, a distraction, something to consume, to occupy yourself — I think gambling does make it more interesting. This is the pitch from the entire sports gambling industry — it improves the game, it adds stakes, it makes it more interesting. You seem to agree. Certainly there are people who feel that way. I think a lot of people I know who do a lot of gambling, they have a sort of mixed feelings about it — I think it does bother them that suddenly the game seems meaningless if they're not gambling on it. But for me, as somebody who doesn't really put money into it, I find it a fascinating thing. Like: Indiana was an eight-and-a-half point favorite [in Monday's college football championship game]. They did not cover. But the meaning of eight-and-a-half points in a spread suggests that the gambling markets believe it will be a blowout. That's different than saying, "I think Indiana's gonna win easily." I find it to be much more intriguing than I would've thought. I was definitely against the idea of sports betting. Ideologically, I thought, "This is bad." And like I say, socially it probably is. But for each individual sport … You argue that football's grip on America will eventually collapse. How will that happen? Football is not just the most popular thing, or just too big to fail. It is too big to stop expanding. It has to constantly get bigger. The financial demands of it, the amount of revenue it has to make, can only go up. The NFL only operates from the position of "How can we stretch out further? Can we even swallow up all the other sports? Can we expand into Europe and all of these things?" And right now, that's a successful thing. The more they make, the more people consume, the more people spend on it —most importantly, the TV networks and streamers who need it. And the depth of caring is so deep. If football went away this fall for whatever reason, people will be like, "What am I gonna bet on? What is my life gonna be like? Who am I? What's my identity if I'm not a fan of this team?" You really saw this during COVID. "We're still playing college football. No one's in their classes, but we gotta play these games. We can't not play them." So it's really brittle, right? It's a system that has to keep going. But I think at some point there is going to be a change. Probably in advertising. It's not that advertising is going to disappear. It's just that what it costs to buy an ad during a football game … it's not going be worth the trade off. So let's say it gets to be a point when Fox or Amazon Prime, or whoever's carrying these games, renegotiates their NFL contract and for the first time, the number doesn't go up. Maybe even the number goes down. [That puts the] NFL's in this weird position — they have to take their best offer. Then the players will say, "There's no way we're going to take less money. There's no way we're going to start playing 22 games just because you're not making enough money from CBS. We're going to strike." Or the owners will be like, "We're going to lock the players out" [because they can't afford to pay them] — like what's happened with baseball. If that happened now, it would be this American calamity, where people would freak out. But as people have less and less of a personal relationship to the game when this happens in the future, they'll be like, "Well, that's an entertaining distraction. I can replace it with something else." Something has to be part of your life for it to be so important that you'll do whatever you can to keep it going. Why will fans have less of a relationship to football? The comparison I use is horse racing. In the 1920s, along with boxing and baseball, it was the biggest sport. And in the 1920s, the average person still had a real relationship to the culture of horses. They had a blue-collar job, and horses were still doing some of the labor. Or their dad had a horse farm. They definitely saw horses all the time. The horse was part of the world in which they lived. That is no longer the case. Now, horse racing is just for people who own horses and people who gamble on it. That's really all it is. My fear is that football's gonna put itself in a position where it's too big. Its tentacles reach too far. And people will say, "Well, I guess we'll choose something else." And when it collapses, something that size collapses hard. It kind of implodes on itself. I'm not one of these people [who complain about capitalism]. But I do think some of the problems of capitalism are easiest seen through sports leagues, which are smaller simulations of society. And what's happening with the way money operates in pro and college football, it seems precarious to me. The financial side's changing in an exponential way. And when society shifts, it's the big things that can't. They're not nimble. The small things can. Read the original article on Business Insider

11m
3 min
0
Read Article
We're siblings who built a 6-figure Turo business in under 2 years. We started with just our mom's car — here's how we scaled up.
Lifestyle

We're siblings who built a 6-figure Turo business in under 2 years. We started with just our mom's car — here's how we scaled up.

Mike and Darlene Person. Courtesy of JDM Whipz Siblings Michael Rumph and Darlene Person built JDM Whipz, a profitable Turo car rental fleet. JDM Whipz grew to 13 vehicles in Atlanta by reinvesting profits and focusing on customer service. Their experience highlights Turo business strategies, challenges, and the importance of planning. This as-told-to essay is based on conversations with Michael Rumph, 60, and Darlene Person, 61, siblings in metro Atlanta who run JDM Whipz, a 13-car Turo fleet. It has been edited for length and clarity. Darlene: For several years, my brother, Mike, and I talked about wanting to go into business together. We considered a few ideas but hadn't settled on one. In February 2022, we rented an Escalade from Turo for a family trip. Almost exactly a year later, we launched our own Turo business, JDM Whipz. By 2024, JDM Whipz was making six figures in profit. We were fascinated by how quickly and easily we'd rented a car from Turo Darlene: Mike dove into research, sending me videos and websites every week. We began meeting on Sundays to discuss launching a Turo business. By January 2023, we had registered the company, and in late February, we went live on Turo, securing our first booking on the same day. I'm a federal government employee, and I still work full-time. Most of my Turo work takes place in the evenings, when I prep cars after my day job. When we started, both of us were balancing full-time jobs. Mike: I'm an IT nerd with 37 years of experience in desktop support, server support, and project management. Now, I'm a full-time Turo project manager. Our first car was a 2016 Toyota Corolla Mike: The Corolla belonged to our mom, who died in June 2022. It's still on the platform; I just had the front end repainted and protective film added. From there, we purchased a 2017 Mazda, a 2017 Chevy Malibu, a 2017 Equinox, and a 2018 Equinox. By the end of our first year, we had 10 cars. We purchased eight with cash and used "creative financing" for the other two, purchasing them with 0% credit cards Today, we have 13 vehicles — we own 12 outright and have one payment on a 2019 Chrysler Pacifica. We've had five cars totaled in the past year, but because I hold a dealer's license and buy vehicles wholesale at auctions, we've been able to replace them and even come out ahead on insurance payouts. The price difference compared to traditional rental companies is huge Mike: Enterprise once quoted me $805 for an SUV from Friday to Sunday. Turo cost us $360 for four days and 600 miles when we rented that Escalade. Darlene: We listed mom's Corolla as a trial, but the first renter kept extending her trip week after week, and it ended up being 2.5 months total. The car was gone, and we had nothing to do, so we said, "Let's add another." From the start, we reinvested every dollar back into the business. That's how we grew to 10 cars in a year. We choose Turo's 60% protection plan: we keep 60%, Turo takes 40%, but our deductible is lower. Hosts can take up to 90% but risk a much higher deductible. Understanding that trade-off is important. Mike: Day-to-day, I'm checking cars in and out, cleaning, handling inspections, and keeping up with competition in the Atlanta market. I left my IT job last April after paying off all my debts. I was breathing and dreaming of Turo at work. Now it's my focus. Darlene: Atlanta is huge, so Mike covers the north side, and I handle the south. We've never had all 13 cars sitting at our homes at once, where we store them. Usually they're rented out, coming back for a day or two before heading out again. I've learned more about cars in these two and a half years than I ever imagined. Turo does national advertising, but we're also exploring our own marketing efforts Darlene: We're obsessed with customer service. Over the years, we've both complained about poor service elsewhere. When we started JDM Whipz, I told Mike, "I want people to feel valued." Our reviews consistently mention exceptional service, which is the most rewarding feedback we receive. Mike: I built JDMWhipz.com because Turo's search doesn't show business names. Our site lets visitors view our entire fleet in one place without having to search. When ready to book, they tap a link that takes them directly to Turo to complete the reservation process. The biggest challenge for new hosts is capital. Ideally, buy or own your first car outright. Read Turo's Terms of Service carefully to understand the responsibilities of both the host and the guest. Another challenge is time Darlene: Most people start Turo while working full-time. You need excellent planning and time management. We learned the hard way: clean a car as soon as it returns. Early on, we'd say, "I'll do it in the morning," and then get a 7 a.m. booking. At 5 a.m., with car washes closed, you're in the driveway scrubbing, photographing, and prepping the car. Now it's a habit: the car comes in, and it gets cleaned. Mike: Revenue now depends on the season and the vehicle. Our Corolla rents for $42 to $46 per day. Some cars earn $800 a month, while others earn $1,200 during peak season in Atlanta, which typically spans from March to September. We're still making six figures in profit a year. Our biggest advice: do your homework Darlene: Check Turo's website for rules, like no cars older than 12 years or with more than 130,000 miles when listed. Watch videos from Turo hosts on YouTube, but vet their advice. Don't be afraid to ask experienced hosts for guidance. Mike and I mentor people all the time; we love helping new hosts succeed. Our long-term goal is to become Atlanta's go-to personal car rental company. We're proud of what we've built — and even prouder to do it together as siblings. Read the original article on Business Insider

12m
3 min
0
Read Article
Politics

World Cup 2026: Could Europe drive a boycott?

Just as it did in Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022, politics is dominating the build up to World Cup 2026. Could discontent with Donald Trump in Europe see football heavyweights united behind such a cause?

13m
3 min
0
Read Article
Newsom Blames Trump for Cancellation of His Davos Appearance
Politics

Newsom Blames Trump for Cancellation of His Davos Appearance

Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said the Trump administration had denied him entry to an American venue at the World Economic Forum. It’s not clear if the administration was responsible.

14m
3 min
0
Read Article
Crew 11 returns to earth and reflects on early mission end
Science

Crew 11 returns to earth and reflects on early mission end

Crew 11- comprising US astronauts Zena Cardman, 38, and Mike Fincke, 58, Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui, 55, and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov, 39 - safely returned to Earth on January 15 from the International Space Station. After a medical issue forced one crew member to end the mission early, the team spoke publicly about their experience for the first time on Wednesday. Daniel Quinlan reports.

14m
3 min
0
Read Article
Prefeito de Bordeaux aceita mediação em meio a disputa sobre transparência orçamentária
Politics

Prefeito de Bordeaux aceita mediação em meio a disputa sobre transparência orçamentária

O prefeito de Bordeaux, Thomas Cazenave, aceitou mediação judicial proposta para resolver disputa com a oposição sobre transparência orçamentária e divulgação de dados financeiros.

14m
5 min
0
Read Article
US to transfer Islamic State prisoners from Syria to Iraq
World_news

US to transfer Islamic State prisoners from Syria to Iraq

The US military has started transferring up to 7,000 Islamic State (IS) detainees from prisons in northeastern Syria to Iraq, as Syria’s new government asserts control over territories long governed autonomously by Kurdish-led forces. US Central Command (Centcom) reported that 150 IS fighters have already been moved from Hassakeh province to a “secure location” in Iraq. Charlotte Lam reports.

16m
3 min
0
Read Article
Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell estudam perspectivas financeiras dos EUA
Cryptocurrency

Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell estudam perspectivas financeiras dos EUA

Uma colaboração entre o Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell University investigará como os americanos percebem a privacidade financeira em um momento de aumento da regulação.

32m
5 min
7
Read Article
Subsídios Congelados, Comunidades Pagam o Preço
Environment

Subsídios Congelados, Comunidades Pagam o Preço

Em Sauget, Illinois, uma comunidade construída para a poluição, um subsídio de US$ 500.000 para monitorar a qualidade do ar foi abruptamente encerrado. Agora, os residentes ficam com saúde precária e sem prova da fonte.

47m
6 min
12
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Voltar ao inicio