M
MercyNews
Home
Back
James Cameron se muda a Nueva Zelanda por 'sanidad'
Entretenimiento

James Cameron se muda a Nueva Zelanda por 'sanidad'

Business Insider5h ago
3 min de lectura
📋

Datos Clave

  • James Cameron, el director de Avatar y Titanic, obtuvo la ciudadanía neozelandesa en 2025 después de años de viajes entre los dos países.
  • El cineasta visitó por primera vez Nueva Zelanda en 1994, cuando un vuelo al Polo Sur fue cancelado debido a condiciones de hielo, lo que llevó a una exploración inesperada de Christchurch.
  • Cameron y su esposa, Susie, compraron una granja en Nueva Zelanda en 2011 pero mantuvieron un estilo de vida transpacífico hasta que la pandemia de COVID-19 impulsó una mudanza permanente en 2020.
  • El director citó la respuesta de EE. UU. a la pandemia y el clima político como las razones principales de su reubicación, buscando una sociedad que "cree en la ciencia".
  • Cameron se encuentra entre varias celebridades, incluyendo a Rosie O'Donnell y Ellen DeGeneres, que han dejado Estados Unidos en los últimos años citando razones políticas o sociales.

Un sueño cumplido

Para James Cameron, la decisión de abandonar Estados Unidos no se trató de escapar a un paraíso tropical, sino de buscar un sentido de estabilidad. El aclamado cineasta, conocido por dirigir superproducciones como Avatar y Titanic, se ha reubicado oficialmente en Nueva Zelanda, un movimiento que describió como esencial para su bienestar mental.

A sus 71 años, Cameron ha sido otorgado con la ciudadanía neozelandesa, marcando la culminación de un sueño que comenzó hace más de tres décadas. Aunque muchos podrían suponer que los impresionantes paisajes eran el principal atractivo, Cameron tiene una razón mucho más pragmática para su reubicación.

No estoy allí por el paisaje. Estoy allí por la sanidad.

El desvío inesperado

La conexión del cineasta con Nueva Zelanda se remonta a un retraso fortuito en 1994. Cameron se dirigía al Polo Sur cuando su vuelo fue cancelado debido a condiciones peligrosas de hielo. Esta parada inesperada en Christchurch se convirtió en una exploración improvisada de la región.

Lo que comenzó como una inconveniencia logística rápidamente se transformó en una profunda conexión personal. Cameron quedó cautivado por la combinación única del país de belleza natural, personas acogedoras y un modo de vida distintivo.

Durante esta visita, hizo un compromiso personal que eventualmente daría forma a su futuro.

  • Explorando el área de Christchurch después de la cancelación del vuelo
  • Enamorándose de la cultura y el paisaje local
  • Haciendo una promesa de regresar y vivir allí algún día

"No estoy allí por el paisaje. Estoy allí por la sanidad."

— James Cameron, Cineasta

La vida se interpone

Después de esa visita inicial, la idea de mudarse a Nueva Zelanda se convirtió en un tema recurrente en la vida de Cameron. Cuando él y su ahora esposa, Susie, comenzaron su relación, ella también estaba abierta al concepto de eventualmente reubicarse en la nación del Pacífico Sur.

Sin embargo, las responsabilidades de la vida y una exitosa carrera en Hollywood retrasaron esos planes. La pareja se estableció en Malibu y Santa Bárbara, criando hijos y construyendo una vida en California. El sueño de Nueva Zelanda permaneció, pero fue pospuesto.

No fue hasta después del enorme éxito de la franquicia Avatar que la conversación resurgió con seriedad. Cameron señaló que habían acordado hacer el movimiento una vez que sus obligaciones profesionales lo permitieran.

El catalizador de la pandemia

La pareja compró una granja en Nueva Zelanda en 2011, estableciendo un punto de apoyo en el país. Durante años, mantuvieron un estilo de vida transpacífico, viajando de ida y vuelta entre Estados Unidos y Nueva Zelanda por trabajo y familia.

Su rutina fue interrumpida abruptamente a principios de 2020. Después de regresar a EE. UU. para Navidad, la pandemia de COVID-19 detuvo los viajes internacionales, dejándolos varados en América mientras su unidad de producción permanecía en Nueva Zelanda.

Cameron describió el esfuerzo para reanudar las operaciones como mover montañas. Los desafíos logísticos de reiniciar una producción cinematográfica durante una crisis de salud global forzaron una decisión crucial. En lugar de continuar con el viaje de ida y vuelta, la familia se comprometió con una reubicación permanente.

Para cuando se establecieron permanentemente en Nueva Zelanda, el país había manejado con éxito el virus a través de altas tasas de vacunación y estrategias cohesivas de salud pública.

Una sociedad de sanidad

La mudanza de Cameron resalta un marcado contraste entre los enfoques de las dos naciones hacia la salud pública y la cohesión social. Expresó una profunda apreciación por la actitud colectiva de Nueva Zelanda hacia la ciencia y la responsabilidad comunitaria.

El cineasta señaló las diferencias en cómo los dos países manejaron la pandemia como un factor definitorio en su decisión. Mientras EE. UU. luchaba con la polarización y el escepticismo, Nueva Zelanda implementó estrategias que Cameron consideró racionales y efectivas.

Planteó una pregunta retórica sobre su elección, enmarcándola como una decisión entre dos modelos sociales fundamentalmente diferentes.

Un lugar que realmente cree en la ciencia, y es sano, y donde las personas pueden trabajar juntas de manera cohesiva hacia un objetivo común, o un lugar donde todos están a la garganta de los demás, extremadamente polarizado, dando la espalda a la ciencia, y básicamente estaría en un desorden absoluto si aparece otra pandemia?

El clima político

La insatisfacción de Cameron con EE. UU. se extiende más allá de la respuesta a la pandemia. En una entrevista separada con un medio neozelandés, criticó el entorno político en Estados Unidos, haciendo referencia específicamente a la era de Donald Trump.

Describió ese período como "un giro alejado de todo lo decente". La saturación constante de los medios de figuras políticas fue otra fuente de frustración para el director.

Señaló una diferencia distintiva en la cobertura mediática entre los dos países, prefiriendo el enfoque neozelandés donde tales figuras podrían aparecer en la página tres en lugar de dominar la portada. Cameron comparó la exposición constante en EE. UU. con ver un accidente automovilístico en repetición.

Una tendencia más amplia

Cameron no es la única figura de alto perfil que ha dejado Estados Unidos por razones políticas o sociales en los últimos años. Ha surgido un patrón de reubicación de celebridades, que refleja preocupaciones más amplias sobre la dirección del país.

La comediante Rosie O'Donnell anunció su mudanza a Irlanda poco antes de una inauguración presidencial, declarando que consideraría regresar solo cuando se garantizaran derechos iguales para todos los ciudadanos.

De manera similar, la presentadora de programas de entrevistas Ellen DeGeneres y su esposa, Portia de Rossi, se reubicaron en el Reino Unido después de los resultados electorales de 2024, decidiendo quedarse permanentemente después de despertarse con la noticia.

Estos movimientos subrayan un creciente sentimiento entre algunas figuras públicas que buscan entornos que perciben como más estables y alineados con sus valores.

Estableciéndose

La reubicación de James Cameron a Nueva Zelanda representa más que un simple cambio de dirección; significa una priorización de la paz mental y la estabilidad social sobre la conveniencia de la carrera. Después de pasar décadas construyendo un legado en Hollywood, el director ahora se enfoca en su futuro en el Hemisferio Sur.

Con la ciudadanía asegurada y una granja establecida, Cameron ha plantado firmemente sus raíces en un país que descubrió por primera vez b Key Facts: 1. James Cameron, the director of Avatar and Titanic, was granted New Zealand citizenship in 2025 after years of travel between the two countries. 2. The filmmaker first visited New Zealand in 1994 when a flight to the South Pole was grounded due to ice conditions, leading to an unexpected exploration of Christchurch. 3. Cameron and his wife, Susie, purchased a farm in New Zealand in 2011 but maintained a trans-Pacific lifestyle until the COVID-19 pandemic prompted a permanent move in 2020. 4. The director cited the US response to the pandemic and the political climate as the primary reasons for his relocation, seeking a society that 'believes in science.' 5. Cameron is among several celebrities, including Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres, who have left the United States in recent years citing political or social reasons. FAQ: Q1: Why did James Cameron move to New Zealand? A1: James Cameron moved to New Zealand primarily for his 'sanity,' citing the US political climate and the country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic as major factors. He also fulfilled a decades-long dream that began with a visit in 1994. Q2: When did James Cameron become a New Zealand citizen? A2: James Cameron was granted New Zealand citizenship in 2025. He and his family had been traveling back and forth since purchasing a farm in the country in 2011 before making the permanent move in 2020. Q3: What did James Cameron say about the US political climate? A3: Cameron has been critical of the US political environment, describing the era of Donald Trump as 'a turn away from everything decent.' He expressed frustration with the constant media coverage of political figures in the US compared to New Zealand. Q4: Is James Cameron the only celebrity to leave the US recently? A4: No, James Cameron is part of a trend of celebrities relocating abroad. Rosie O'Donnell moved to Ireland, and Ellen DeGeneres moved to the UK, both citing political or social reasons for their decisions.

Continue scrolling for more

La IA transforma la investigación y las demostraciones matemáticas
Technology

La IA transforma la investigación y las demostraciones matemáticas

La inteligencia artificial está pasando de ser una promesa a una realidad en las matemáticas. Los modelos de aprendizaje automático generan teoremas originales, forzando una reevaluación de la investigación y la enseñanza.

Just now
4 min
342
Read Article
Chuck Klosterman: Por qué el dominio del fútbol será su perdición
Sports

Chuck Klosterman: Por qué el dominio del fútbol será su perdición

En su nuevo libro, el escritor Chuck Klosterman examina por qué la supremacía cultural actual del fútbol contiene las semillas de su eventual colapso, citando presiones financieras y relaciones cambiantes con los aficionados.

14m
7 min
6
Read Article
Hermanos construyen negocio de 6 cifras en Turo en menos de 2 años
Lifestyle

Hermanos construyen negocio de 6 cifras en Turo en menos de 2 años

Michael Rumph y Darlene Person transformaron el Toyota Corolla 2016 de su madre en un próspero negocio de alquiler de autos en Atlanta, demostrando que la planificación estratégica y el trabajo en equipo familiar pueden crear un negocio secundario lucrativo.

15m
5 min
6
Read Article
Amenaza de boicot europeo al Mundial de Fútbol 2026
Politics

Amenaza de boicot europeo al Mundial de Fútbol 2026

A medida que se acerca el Mundial de Fútbol 2026, las tensiones políticas aumentan. Las potencias europeas del fútbol consideran un boicot por el descontento con Donald Trump, reflejando protestas pasadas en Rusia y Qatar.

16m
5 min
6
Read Article
Alcalde de Burdeos acepta mediación en disputa por transparencia presupuestaria
Politics

Alcalde de Burdeos acepta mediación en disputa por transparencia presupuestaria

El alcalde de Burdeos, Thomas Cazenave, ha aceptado una mediación judicial para resolver una disputa con la oposición sobre la transparencia presupuestaria y la divulgación de gastos.

17m
5 min
6
Read Article
Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.
Politics

Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.

Whole milk, yuck. Getty Images; BI The government's latest dietary guidelines suggest people drink whole milk instead of low-fat. This matters a lot for school lunches, where whole milk will get top billing. But for the rest of us: Who actually prefers sludgy, thick whole milk over crisp skim? Yuck! I refuse the long arm of the government's reach into my refrigerator: I'm not drinking whole milk! And I readily accept that food is political, so the fact that the latest dietary guidelines from the US government — which say to drink whole milk instead of skim — are being seen as the latest political battle isn't a surprise. But there's something in the latest whole milk debate that is truly confusing to me. It's that … whole milk isn't very good? And I don't think many of us have felt we couldn't drink it because of government guidelines. We just don't like it! Whole milk as a win for freedom? Secretary of Health and full-fat dairy booster Robert Kennedy Jr. is a polarizing figure, so people are going to interpret this kind of video in a way that fits their worldview: 🥛 pic.twitter.com/QUeSfR7EC8 — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) January 15, 2026 The government is positioning this change as people being desperate to drink whole milk but feeling they weren't allowed to. That they were forced to settle for skim or 2% milk, and finally, thanks to the Trump administration, are allowed the verboten pleasures again. Here's MY beef: Whole milk is gross. Whole milk is too sludgy, too thick. It always kind of smells like it's on its way to turning sour. I find the white residue it leaves on the sides of a glass off-putting. Yuck. One-percent milk is crisp, drinkable, watery, cold, and refreshing. Great to drink on its own or as a bath for cereal. Personally, I think skim is too watery, and 2% too close to whole, but I accept those options as well. For me, it's not any fear of fat intake that has kept me from buying whole milk; it's that whole milk is stinky and gross. I should note here that the health benefits of whole vs. low-fat milk are a living, breathing debate. Whole milk has more saturated fat, which is potentially "bad," but it has more vitamins and enzymes or whatever, which are potentially "good." (Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist here, people! Don't trust me — do your own research.) If you're truly interested in learning more about the details of the health benefits of dairy, I suggest you read this instead of listening to me whine about my personal milk preference. Don't listen to me about healthy food choices; my doctor shook her head sadly and said "noooooo" when I told her what kinds of garbage I typically eat for dinner (yes, my cholesterol is high). For me, worrying about the milkfat content of my cereal is like worrying about which multivitamin brand to buy when I often go days without eating a fresh vegetable. I'm stuffing so many chemicals and processed garbage down my gullet on the reg that any kind of milk is the healthiest thing I'll consume by far. Robert F. Kennedy presents the new "Dietary Guidelines for Americans," which include favoring whole milk. Yuck. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Yes, I'm sure there are some of you out there who are adult whole milk fans and prefer it over skim. Like whole milk? Know that I see you, I accept you, and you are valid. It's fine to have a taste preference. But I simply don't believe there are throngs of adults out there who've been feeling forced to choke down 2% when they were dying for whole milk. You're a grownup! Buy whatever milk you like! Of course, the main point of the latest guidelines isn't really aimed at making suggestions to adults. The actionable part of the guidelines is that they inform the rules for federal food programs for kids, like the National School Lunch Program, which previously only allowed low-fat milk options. I don't really care if a kid prefers whole or skim milk with their sloppy Joe or PB&J — either option seems better to me than chocolate milk, which, according to my own elementary school children, is what everyone chooses at lunch anyway. If the government is going to start meddling more with school lunches, frankly, I'd welcome them to start with the abusive fee structure in some of the digital lunch payment systems that many districts have adopted. My kids' school uses a payment provider for lunches that charges a $3.50 fee every time you add money to your kid's account (and requires separate accounts per sibling). President Trump, please look into that. For me, I am not going to change my milk-drinking ways. I was raised in a 1% household. I will continue to buy 1% because it's delicious, and whole milk is gross, and Uncle Sam can't tell me what to do. Read the original article on Business Insider

19m
3 min
0
Read Article
Student-loan forgiveness for public servants is at risk under Trump's plan to ax cheaper monthly payments, Democratic lawmakers say
Politics

Student-loan forgiveness for public servants is at risk under Trump's plan to ax cheaper monthly payments, Democratic lawmakers say

Sen. Jeff Merkley raised concerns about ending the SAVE student-loan repayment plan. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images A group of Democratic lawmakers raised concerns with Trump's proposed settlement to eliminate the SAVE plan. They said that abruptly moving student-loan borrowers off of SAVE could put PSLF debt relief at risk. The department said borrowers would have a limited time to begin repayment once SAVE is gone. Millions of student-loan borrowers could soon be forced off a key repayment plan — and debt relief is on the line. On Thursday, a group of Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Jeff Merkley, Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Tim Kaine, led their colleagues in raising concerns regarding the Department of Education's proposed settlement to end the SAVE student-loan repayment plan. Over 7 million borrowers are enrolled in SAVE, which was created by former President Joe Biden and intended to give borrowers cheaper monthly payments with a shorter timeline to loan forgiveness. Litigation halted the plan in 2024, and President Donald Trump's administration recently announced a proposed settlement that would effectively eliminate the plan and require borrowers to transfer to an existing plan with higher payments. Trump's "big beautiful" spending legislation called for eliminating SAVE by 2028, and this settlement would accelerate that timeline. The lawmakers wrote in a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon that borrowers are likely to face "significant hurdles" switching to a new plan, and those enrolled in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program — which forgives student debt for government and nonprofit workers after 10 years — are at heightened risk. "Forcing these borrowers to transition out of SAVE with little guidance risks further lost time to debt relief and payment increases that could render continued public service untenable," the lawmakers wrote. Business Insider wants to hear about the challenges, successes, and unique experiences you're facing with your student loans. Do you have a story to share? Please fill out this form, and we'll be in touch. Read more of our student-loan coverage: Student-loan borrowers are gearing up for higher monthly payments after Trump moves to ax their affordable plan: 'I'm bracing for an astronomical bill' How Trump's big spending bill will overhaul repayment for millions of student-loan borrowers Student-loan borrowers behind on payments are getting a major break Borrowers have not received credit toward PSLF while on the SAVE forbearance. While resuming payments on a different income-driven repayment plan would count toward PSLF, the lawmakers wrote that transitioning millions of borrowers to a new plan in a short timeframe would be a significant administrative burden, and they requested that the Department of Education give borrowers at least six months to switch to a new plan before their next payment comes due. The department wrote in its press release that SAVE borrowers "will have a limited time" to select a new repayment plan. Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said in a statement at the time that "American taxpayers can now rest assured they will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for illegal and irresponsible student loan policies." A slew of changes is on the horizon for student-loan borrowers. While borrowers are still waiting for a court to approve the SAVE settlement, provisions of Trump's spending legislation — including new repayment plans and borrowing caps — are set to be rolled out beginning in July. Those changes come as over 5 million borrowers are in default on their student loans, following the Trump administration's resumption of collections in May 2025 after a five-year pause. The Education Department announced last week that it is temporarily pausing wage garnishment and tax refund seizures for defaulted borrowers. Still, Democratic lawmakers said in their letter that SAVE borrowers are at risk of defaulting should they face challenges transitioning to a new plan. "It is imperative the Department take every action possible to ensure the 7 million borrowers currently enrolled in SAVE are provided with the information and resources necessary to avoid delinquency or default in order to avoid an even bigger default crisis," they wrote. Read the original article on Business Insider

19m
3 min
0
Read Article
Israeli fire kills 11 in Gaza: Three journalists among the dead
Politics

Israeli fire kills 11 in Gaza: Three journalists among the dead

In Gaza on Wednesday, Israeli forces killed 11 Palestinians in multiple attacks, including a strike on a vehicle carrying three journalists documenting a new displacement camp. Since the ceasefire took effect on October 10, both sides have frequently accused each other of violating the agreement, Gabrielle Nadler reports.

20m
3 min
0
Read Article
Capitalism as we know it is having an identity crisis — and you're caught in the middle
Economics

Capitalism as we know it is having an identity crisis — and you're caught in the middle

Getty Images; Tyler Le/BI From Davos to Washington to America's high school classrooms, people are questioning the foundations of our economic system — and we at Business Insider are tracking what the fight over the future of capitalism means for your work, your wealth, and your world. Polls show Americans' trust in capitalism is falling fast, as daily life has grown more expensive and less secure. Our own recent survey of readers found that people are worried their wages aren't keeping up with their expenses, that housing feels out of reach, and that the whole system seems shaky. Many employers are leaning even more heavily into a capitalistic approach, deemphasizing loyalty and tenure in favor of ruthless meritocracy. Meanwhile, the US government has taken a more hands-on role in the economy, becoming a shareholder in several companies and upending its place in the capitalist system. As questions about the state of capitalism grow, leaders are pitching competing visions of the economy's future. President Trump told a room full of CEOs, executives, and media figures at Davos this week that the US is reshaping the rules to make sure the country comes out of this period of transition "bigger and better than before." Some are pushing for reform, like California governor Gavin Newsom, who called for a "rules-based, competitive" model at Davos. Others, like New York City's self-described socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani, want to rethink the system from the ground up — and have a lot of voters on board. While capitalism's future hangs in the balance, Business Insider is digging in. We're exploring how and why the system is being reshaped — by government policy, by companies, and by you. Tell us what you think about the future of capitalism. Test your own understanding. And stick with us as we track how this system is evolving in real time, and what it will look like next. Read the original article on Business Insider

21m
3 min
0
Read Article
Donald Trump backs down on Greenland
Politics

Donald Trump backs down on Greenland

Donald Trump says he is moving toward a deal on Greenland following discussions with NATO chief Mark Rutte. The US president had earlier declined to rule out the use of military force to acquire the territory from Denmark, a NATO member—a stance many experts warned could threaten the alliance’s cohesion. Ellen Gainsford reports.

21m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Volver al inicio