- The year 2025 has been characterized by a dramatic reversal of alliances, marking a potential end to the 80-year-old relationship between the United States and Europe.
- Observers note that while the Atlantic Alliance technically remains in existence, the second Trump administration has displayed significant hostility toward European allies while simultaneously fostering closer ties with Russia.
- This shift has led experts to question the validity of the Treaty Atlantic's Article 5 regarding collective defense, suggesting it may now be merely a hollow declaration.
- The geopolitical landscape has changed rapidly over 11 months, with the US administration prioritizing a distinct foreign policy doctrine that diverges sharply from historical norms.
Quick Summary
The geopolitical landscape of 2025 has been defined by a dramatic reversal of long-standing alliances. Specifically, the United States has reportedly severed its historic 80-year alliance with Europe, a relationship that had served as the bedrock of international security since the post-war era. This shift is not characterized by a formal military withdrawal or the closure of bases, but rather by a fundamental change in political will and diplomatic posture.
Despite the Atlantic Alliance remaining technically active on paper, the atmosphere has turned toxic. Over the course of 11 months during the second Trump presidency, a clear pattern of hostility toward European nations has emerged. Simultaneously, the administration has pursued a distinct acercamiento a Rusia (approach to Russia). This dual strategy has led to widespread skepticism regarding the future of collective security. Experts now debate whether the mutual defense clauses that once bound the West together can survive this ideological divergence.
The End of an Era? 🌍
The year 2025 is increasingly viewed as the moment the Atlantic Alliance effectively ended. For eight decades, the United States and Europe maintained a security architecture that defined the Western world. However, current observations suggest this era is closing. The Washington Post has noted that the current administration's doctrine appears to be 'Make America Small Again,' signaling a retreat from global leadership and traditional alliances.
While the infrastructure of the alliance remains—troops are not packing their bags and bases remain open—the political substance has evaporated. The Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores (Council on Foreign Relations) highlights that the secretary general of the alliance has been forced to issue constant praise for the US leadership to prevent a scandalous rupture. This diplomatic maneuvering underscores the fragility of the current situation. The core question remains: can an alliance function when its primary architect actively undermines its purpose?
A New Geopolitical Doctrine 🤝
The driving force behind this reversal is the foreign policy of the current US administration. Having returned to the Casa Blanca, the leadership has prioritized a relationship with Rusia over traditional European partners. This pivot is not subtle; it is described as a defining feature of the last 11 months. The Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores notes that this strategy has been 'acreditada' (validated) by the administration's actions.
Analysts are scrambling to define this new approach. Michael Kimmage explores the 'Trump Power Paradox' and questions what kind of world order the current National Security Strategy seeks. Meanwhile, Fareed Zakaria argues that the doctrine is effectively a reduction of American influence, summarized as 'Make America Small Again.' This represents a significant departure from the interventionist policies that characterized the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
The Hollow Promise of Defense 🛡️
The most critical casualty of this diplomatic shift is the credibility of Article 5 of the Tratado Atlántico. This article, which stipulates that an attack on one member is an attack on all, has been the cornerstone of NATO deterrence. However, experts now argue that it has become little more than an 'empty declaration.' The hostility from the US toward Europe casts doubt on whether Washington would actually intervene if a European nation were attacked.
This erosion of trust has led to a fracturing of the Western bloc. Jaroslaw Kuisza writes about the 'rise of two wests,' suggesting that the democratic model itself is threatened by this internal division. The Alianza Atlántica may survive in administrative terms, but its strategic deterrent capability is being questioned in real-time by the very nations that built it.
Conclusion: A Fractured West
The events of 2025 suggest that the post-World War II order is undergoing a fundamental transformation. The United States is no longer the guarantor of European security in the way it once was. Instead, a new era of transactional politics and regional realignment is taking hold. The Atlantic Alliance faces an existential crisis that cannot be solved by pleasantries or diplomatic niceties.
As the year closes, the world watches to see if this reversal is temporary or permanent. With the Trump administration firmly entrenched and its foreign policy doctrine clearly articulated, the likelihood of a return to the status quo ante appears slim. The 'two Wests' described by analysts may become a permanent feature of the 21st century, fundamentally altering the global balance of power.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened to the US-Europe alliance in 2025?
In 2025, the United States reportedly broke its 80-year-old alliance with Europe. While the Atlantic Alliance technically still exists, the US administration has displayed hostility toward European allies and pursued closer ties with Russia.
Is the NATO Article 5 defense pact still valid?
Experts doubt that Article 5 of the Atlantic Treaty regarding collective defense is still valid, describing it as potentially 'empty' due to the current US administration's foreign policy shifts.



