Prince Harry Claims Targeted Campaign by Daily Mail Publisher

The High Court has heard that Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, believes he has been the target of a 'sustained campaign' of attacks by the publisher of the Daily Mail. This claim was made by his legal team as they outlined allegations of unlawful information gathering.

The case centers on the assertion that these attacks were a direct response to the Duke's decision to challenge the publisher in court. Legal representatives for the Duke presented a series of articles they allege were obtained through improper means.

Lawyers representing Prince Harry have formally alleged that Associated Newspapers Ltd engaged in unlawful information-gathering to secure stories about the Duke. The court was presented with a specific set of 14 articles that form the basis of this claim. These articles are said to have been published by the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday.

The central argument from the Duke's legal team is that this activity constitutes a targeted effort against him. They argue the motivation stems from his legal actions against the publisher. The court heard that the Duke feels he has endured this campaign for having what was described as 'the temerity to stand up' to the media conglomerate.

The Duke of Sussex believes he has faced a 'sustained campaign' of attacks for having 'the temerity to stand up' to the publisher of the Daily Mail.

This hearing is part of a broader legal dispute between the Duke and the newspaper publisher. The 14 articles in question are central to the Duke's case, which accuses the publisher of unlawful information-gathering. The specific methods alleged have not been detailed in the initial court hearing summary, but the claim points to systematic practices.

The Duke is scheduled to provide personal testimony in court this week. His evidence is expected to support the claims made by his legal counsel regarding the nature and impact of the alleged campaign. This legal battle highlights the ongoing tensions between the Duke and certain sections of the British press.

• Allegations of unlawful information gathering
• 14 specific articles cited in the case
• Associated Newspapers Ltd named as the defendant
• The Duke scheduled to give evidence this week

Associated Newspapers Ltd, which publishes the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday, is the respondent in this case. While the court heard the allegations from the Duke's side, the publisher's response to these specific claims was not detailed in the provided source material. Typically in such cases, publishers defend their journalistic methods and the public interest value of their reporting.

The legal proceedings will require both sides to present their evidence and arguments. The publisher will have the opportunity to respond to the allegations of unlawful information gathering and the claim of a 'sustained campaign' against the Duke. The outcome of this case could have implications for press practices and privacy rights.

The immediate next step in this legal matter is the Duke of Sussex giving evidence in the High Court. His testimony is anticipated to provide further details about the alleged campaign and its effects. The court will then consider the evidence presented by both parties before reaching a decision.

This case represents a significant moment in the ongoing debate about media ethics and privacy in the United Kingdom. The Duke's legal challenge continues a pattern of high-profile actions he has taken against media organizations since stepping back from royal duties. The court's eventual ruling could set important precedents for future cases involving media practices and public figures.

The High Court hearing has brought to light serious allegations from Prince Harry regarding his treatment by a major newspaper publisher. The Duke's claim of a 'sustained campaign' of attacks positions this case as more than a simple privacy dispute—it frames it as a matter of journalistic accountability.

As the legal process unfolds, the case will likely continue to draw significant public attention. The Duke's scheduled testimony will be closely watched, as it may provide deeper insight into the relationship between public figures and the press in modern Britain. The final judgment will be awaited with interest by both media professionals and the general public.