M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Demystifying the Linux Kernel: Beyond the Black Box
Технологии

Demystifying the Linux Kernel: Beyond the Black Box

Habr1d ago
3 мин чтения
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ The Linux kernel is frequently described in technical literature as a 'sacred cow' or an impenetrable 'black box' that performs its duties behind the scenes.
  • ✓ Contrary to popular belief, the kernel is fundamentally an executable file, similar to any other binary program that can be compiled and run on the system.
  • ✓ It can be acquired and executed through standard methods, such as compiling from source code or copying an existing kernel image, demystifying its operation.
  • ✓ The central goal of these explorations is to build a clear mental picture of the Linux architecture and how its various components communicate with one another.
  • ✓ As the core of the operating system, the kernel is the first program loaded on startup and manages all critical hardware and software interactions for the machine's entire uptime.

In This Article

  1. The Kernel Illusion
  2. The Executable Reality
  3. Building a Mental Model
  4. Defining the Core
  5. Demystifying the Core

The Kernel Illusion#

Within the vast ecosystem of Linux literature and tutorials, the kernel is frequently portrayed as a sacred entity—a 'black box' that operates behind a curtain of command-line interactions. Users and administrators rely on utilities and scripts, trusting that this hidden component performs its miracles to keep the system running smoothly.

However, this mystique often creates an unnecessary barrier to understanding. The reality is far more grounded and accessible than the mythology suggests. The Linux kernel is not a magical artifact; it is a tangible piece of software with a clear, functional purpose.

Linux kernel is simply an executable file. There's no magic. It can be taken, compiled (or simply copied), and run like any other binary.

This fundamental insight shifts the perspective from awe to comprehension, inviting a deeper exploration into the system's core architecture.

The Executable Reality#

At its core, the investigation centers on a single, powerful assertion: the kernel is just a program. While it holds a privileged position as the core of the operating system, its form is that of an executable file. This means it can be handled, manipulated, and executed much like any other application, though its function is far more integral to the machine's operation.

The process of proving this involves practical experimentation. One can approach the kernel through familiar methods: compiling it from source code or simply copying an existing kernel image. Once obtained, the final step is to run it, demystifying its nature through direct interaction.

  • Obtain the kernel source code
  • Compile the source into a binary
  • Execute the resulting file
  • Observe the system's response

These steps illustrate that the barrier between user and kernel is not one of inaccessibility, but of understanding. The 'magic' is merely complex engineering, not arcane knowledge.

"Linux kernel is simply an executable file. There's no magic. It can be taken, compiled (or simply copied), and run like any other binary."

— Technical Investigation

Building a Mental Model#

The primary goal of dissecting the kernel is not merely to perform technical feats, but to construct a clear mental model of how Linux is architected. By visualizing the kernel as a distinct, runnable component, one can better understand the intricate dance of communication between the operating system's various parts.

This clarity is crucial for anyone looking to move beyond surface-level usage. It transforms the abstract concept of 'the system' into a concrete arrangement of interacting programs and files. The kernel acts as the central hub, managing resources and facilitating dialogue between hardware and software.

Key areas of focus for this model include:

  • Process Management: How the kernel schedules and runs applications.
  • Memory Management: How it allocates and protects memory for different processes.
  • Hardware Abstraction: How it provides a consistent interface for device drivers.

With this framework, the entire operating system becomes a logical, comprehensible structure rather than a collection of mysterious parts.

Defining the Core#

Before diving into experiments, it is essential to establish a precise definition of what the kernel actually is. In the simplest terms, the kernel is the core component of an operating system. It serves as the primary bridge between the computer's physical hardware and the software applications that run on it.

It is the first program loaded on startup, and it remains running for the entire duration of the machine's operation. Its responsibilities are foundational and non-negotiable for a functioning system.

The kernel's duties include:

  1. Resource Allocation: Deciding which process gets to use the CPU and for how long.
  2. Memory Control: Managing the system's RAM to prevent conflicts between programs.
  3. Device Communication: Handling requests from software to use hardware like disks, networks, and displays.

By understanding these core functions, the importance of the kernel becomes clear. It is not just another program; it is the fundamental manager of the entire computing environment.

Demystifying the Core#

The journey from viewing the kernel as a 'black box' to recognizing it as a standard executable file is a transformative one. It replaces uncertainty with knowledge, empowering users to engage with their systems on a deeper level. The experiments proposed are not just technical exercises; they are a rite of passage in understanding the true nature of Linux.

By stripping away the layers of mystique, we find a logical, well-designed component that is approachable and understandable. The kernel's power does not come from secrecy, but from its robust design and critical function within the operating system.

Ultimately, the key takeaway is that knowledge demystifies power. The Linux kernel, once seen as an impenetrable fortress, reveals itself as a well-architected structure that anyone can learn to navigate and understand.

#Системное программирование#Linux#Операционные системы#DevOps#Разработка под Linux

Continue scrolling for more

ИИ преобразует математические исследования и доказательства
Technology

ИИ преобразует математические исследования и доказательства

Искусственный интеллект перешел из статуса непостоянного обещания в реальность, преобразуя математические исследования. Модели машинного обучения теперь генерируют оригинальные теоремы.

Just now
4 min
173
Read Article
МВФ предупреждает: ИИ может усугубить неравенство и требует поддержки работников
Economics

МВФ предупреждает: ИИ может усугубить неравенство и требует поддержки работников

МВФ выпустил новое предупреждение: искусственный интеллект уже влияет на рынок труда, усугубляя неравенство. Фонд призывает правительства усилить поддержку работников.

40m
3 min
6
Read Article
Politics

DHS Deportation Reels Are Getting Copyright Strikes for Unlicensed Music Use

Article URL: https://reason.com/2026/01/11/the-deportation-playlist-is-mostly-stolen/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46612934 Points: 12 # Comments: 0

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Technology

Big Tech is poaching energy talent to fuel its AI ambitions

Hires of energy-related talent by Big Tech was 30% higher in 2025 than pre-AI levels.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ethereum может превзойти Bitcoin в 2026 году
Cryptocurrency

Ethereum может превзойти Bitcoin в 2026 году

В 2026 году Ethereum может сократить разрыв в показателях с Bitcoin. Ожидаемое превосходство обусловлено перетоком капитала в утилитарные активы и улучшением ончейн-активности.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Recrutement : pourquoi les candidats se dopent à l’IA
Technology

Recrutement : pourquoi les candidats se dopent à l’IA

Les futures recrues disent utiliser l’intelligence artificielle, première compétence exigée par les employeurs dans le monde, parce que trois recruteurs sur quatre s’en servent déjà, majoritairement pour rédiger leurs petites annonces, constate, dans sa chronique, la journaliste du « Monde » Anne Rodier.

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

2h
5 min
7
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
Отключение интернета в Иране: Цифровой занавес
Politics

Отключение интернета в Иране: Цифровой занавес

Тегеран перешел от контролируемого «халального интернета» к почти полному отключению. Активисты используют контрабандные спутниковые технологии для передачи информации.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

На главную