M
MercyNews
Home
Back
O Poder de Trump Remodela a Ordem Global
Politica

O Poder de Trump Remodela a Ordem Global

Japan Times18h ago
3 min de leitura
📋

Fatos Principais

  • Ações recentes abalaram a ordem mundial tradicional e as normas internacionais
  • Tanto aliados quanto adversários ficaram abalados com as mudanças de política
  • incerteza sobre ações futuras tornou-se uma característica definidora
  • Questões permanecem sobre se as mudanças são duradouras ou reversíveis
  • Protocolos diplomáticos tradicionais foram fundamentalmente desafiados

Resumo Rápido

A ordem global experimentou uma ruptura sem precedentes após recentes exercícios de poder político bruto provenientes dos Estados Unidos. Essas ações alteraram fundamentalmente décadas de normas internacionais estabelecidas, criando ondas de choque que alcançaram todos os cantos do mundo diplomático.

Tanto aliados tradicionais quanto adversários estratégicos encontram-se na posição incomum de recalibrar suas políticas externas em tempo real. A incerteza que envolve ações futuras tornou-se uma característica definidora desta era, com observadores internacionais questionando se as mudanças representam um afastamento temporário das normas estabelecidas ou uma reestruturação permanente das dinâmicas de poder global.

Disrupção Global

O exercício de poder bruto enviou ondas de choque através de instituições internacionais que serviram como a base da estabilidade global por gerações. Mecanismos tradicionais de diplomacia e cooperação foram desafiados por uma abordagem que prioriza a ação unilateral sobre a construção de consenso multilateral.

Observadores internacionais notaram que a velocidade e escala

O impacto foi particularmente pronunciado em várias áreas-chave:

  • Alianças tradicionais foram tensionadas por mudanças de política inesperadas
  • Instituições internacionais enfrentam desafios à sua autoridade
  • Protocolos diplomáticos foram subvertidos por abordagens não convencionais
  • Mercados globais responderam com volatilidade aumentada

Esses desenvolvimentos representam mais do que incidentes isolados; eles sinalizam uma potencial mudança de paradigma em como as relações internacionais são conduzidas no século 21.

"Muitos não têm certeza do que ele fará a seguir e se as mudanças mais recentes serão duradouras ou podem ser desfeitas por um presidente dos EUA mais tradicional no futuro."

— Análise de Política Internacional

Aliados e Adversários

Tanto amigos quanto inimigos se encontraram na posição sem precedentes de reavaliar suas relações com os Estados Unidos simultaneamente. Aliados de longa data que dependeram de uma política externa americana previsível por décadas agora enfrentam o desafio de navegar um cenário onde as garantias tradicionais não têm mais o mesmo peso.

O efeito de abalamento mencionado em círculos diplomáticos se estende através do espectro das relações internacionais. Mesmo nações tradicionalmente em desacordo com os interesses americanos tiveram que recalcular suas estratégias, já que as regras de engajamento parecem estar em fluxo.

Muitos não têm certeza do que ele fará a seguir e se as mudanças mais recentes serão duradouras ou podem ser desfeitas por um presidente dos EUA mais tradicional no futuro.

Essa incerteza cria um desafio único para estrategistas de política externa em todo o mundo, que agora devem contar com variáveis que anteriormente pareciam constantes nas relações internacionais.

Incerteza Prevalece

O desafio mais significativo enfrentado pela comunidade global é a incerteza onipresente sobre ações futuras. Essa imprevisibilidade tornou-se uma característica central das relações internacionais, complicando tudo, desde o planejamento estratégico de longo prazo até a resposta imediata a crises.

Analistas de política e profissionais diplomáticos estão lidando com questões fundamentais sobre a durabilidade dos arranjos atuais. A possibilidade de que as políticas de hoje possam ser revertidas amanhã cria um clima onde os compromissos de longo prazo se tornam cada vez mais difíceis de manter.

Áreas-chave de preocupação incluem:

  • Acordos comerciais e parcerias econômicas
  • Alianças de segurança e compromissos de defesa
  • Acordos ambientais e climáticos
  • Direitos humanos e protocolos diplomáticos

As implicações de longo prazo permanecem incertas, já que a comunidade internacional observa para ver se essas mudanças representam uma nova normalidade ou um afastamento temporário da prática estabelecida.

Implicações Futuras

A questão fundamental que enfrenta formuladores de política e cidadãos igualmente centra-se na permanência dessas mudanças. As mudanças na política externa americana provarão ser transformações duradouras, ou serão reversíveis por lideranças futuras retornando a abordagens mais tradicionais?

Essa questão tem implicações profundas para como as nações abordam seu planejamento estratégico de longo prazo. Se as mudanças são permanentes, aliados e adversários devem reconsiderar fundamentalmente seu lugar na ordem internacional. Se são temporárias, o desafio torna-se determinar como preservar a memória institucional e preparar-se para potenciais mudanças futuras.

A comunidade global permanece em um modo de espera e observação, com canais diplomáticos trabalhando horas extras para entender as novas regras de engajamento. O resultado deste período de incerteza provavelmente moldará as relações internacionais por décadas.

Olhando para Frente

O momento atual representa um ponto crítico nas relações internacionais modernas. O exercício de poder político bruto demonstrou como rapidamente as normas estabelecidas podem ser desafiadas e como a ordem global pode parecer frágil quando testada.

O que emerge deste período de incerteza provavelmente definirá o sistema internacional do século 21. A durabilidade das mudanças recentes, a resposta da comunidade internacional e a direção eventual da política externa americana todos desembrarão papéis cruciais na determinação do futuro da governança global.

Por enquanto, o mundo observa, espera e prepara-se para múltiplos cenários, entendendo que as regras que uma vez pareceram fixas podem ser mais maleáveis do que se assumia anteriormente. A única certeza é que a paisagem internacional foi permanentemente alterada, independentemente do que vier a seguir.

Perguntas Frequentes

O que causou a disrupção na ordem global?

O exercício de poder político bruto abalou décadas de normas internacionais estabelecidas. Essas ações criaram ondas de choque através de canais e instituições diplomáticas tradicionais.

Como outras nações estão respondendo a essas mudanças?

Tanto aliados quanto adversários ficaram abalados e incertos sobre a política americana futura. Nações em todo o mundo estão reavaliando suas relações diplomáticas e estratégicas em tempo real.

Qual é a principal incerteza que enfrenta a comunidade global?

A questão central é se essas mudanças provarão ser permanentes ou podem ser revertidas por lideranças futuras. Essa incerteza complica o planejamento estratégico de longo prazo para todas as nações.

Quais são as implicações de longo prazo?

A durabilidade dessas mudanças moldará as relações internacionais do século 21. O resultado determinará se as alianças e instituições tradicionais podem se adaptar ou serão permanentemente reestruturadas.

#WORLD

Continue scrolling for more

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas
Technology

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas

A inteligência artificial está se tornando uma realidade na matemática. Modelos de aprendizado de máquina agora geram teoremas originais, forçando uma reavaliação da pesquisa e do ensino.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
Defensores do Bitcoin pressionam o Congresso sobre regras fiscais de stablecoins
Cryptocurrency

Defensores do Bitcoin pressionam o Congresso sobre regras fiscais de stablecoins

Defensores de criptomoedas pressionam o Congresso para expandir isenções fiscais além de stablecoins, argumentando que a abordagem atual não simplifica pagamentos e desencoraja a adoção mainstream de moedas digitais.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Politics

Death toll from Iran's crackdown on protests jumps to at least 2,571, activists say

The figure analysts say dwarfs the death toll from any other round of protest or unrest in Iran in decades and recalls the chaos surrounding the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own
Politics

Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own

US Vice President JD Vance will host Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers for talks on Wednesday.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

1h
5 min
3
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.
Politics

Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.

Its security forces have brutally defended the Islamic Republic, but the protests show that many Iranians consider it stagnant and ideologically hollow.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record
Science

Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record

2025 saw a cooling phase in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, yet heat from greenhouse gases countered that cooling enough that the year still was among the warmest.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Voltar ao inicio