M
MercyNews
Home
Back
A Jogada de Alto Risco de Trump na Venezuela e no Irã
Politica

A Jogada de Alto Risco de Trump na Venezuela e no Irã

The New York Times3h ago
3 min de leitura
📋

Fatos Principais

  • O presidente Trump se posicionou para perseguir uma agenda de política externa excepcionalmente assertiva com ampla margem de ação.
  • A abordagem da administração abrange múltiplos teatros geopolíticos desafiadores simultaneamente.
  • Cada engajamento internacional carrega seu próprio conjunto único de complicações e consequências potenciais.
  • A estratégia do presidente depende de manter a flexibilidade enquanto navega por cenários diplomáticos complexos.
  • A política externa americana sob essa abordagem prioriza a ação decisória sobre os processos diplomáticos graduais.

Um Novo Capítulo Audaz

O presidente Trump entrou em uma nova fase de seu mandato marcada por ações internacionais decisivas e assertivas. A administração parece pronta para perseguir a intervenção máxima em múltiplos fronts geopolíticos desafiadores simultaneamente.

Essa mudança representa uma evolução fundamental na política externa americana, passando do engajamento cauteloso para o confronto direto com adversários de longa data. O presidente se posicionou com considerável flexibilidade para tomar decisões de alto risco que poderiam reestruturar a dinâmica internacional.

No entanto, essa abordagem agressiva introduz uma teia complexa de complicações potenciais. Cada teatro de engajamento apresenta desafios únicos que poderiam escalar rapidamente além das expectativas iniciais.

O Cenário Estratégico

O foco da administração na Venezuela e no Irã demonstra a disposição de confrontar diretamente regimes enraizados. Essas nações representam pontos críticos onde os interesses americanos se cruzam com preocupações de estabilidade regional.

O presidente Trump cultivou espaço substancial para manobrar em suas decisões de política externa. Essa liberdade operacional permite uma resposta rápida a crises emergentes, mas também aumenta o potencial de consequências não intencionais.

O cálculo geopolítico envolve equilibrar múltiplos interesses concorrentes:

  • Preocupações com a estabilidade regional
  • Dinâmica de alianças internacionais
  • Alavancagem de sanções econômicas
  • Considerações políticas domésticas

Cada decisão nesses ambientes complexos cria efeitos cascata que se estendem muito além do alvo imediato da política americana.

Avaliação de Riscos

A postura intervencionista do presidente cria um cenário repleto de cartas na manga potenciais. Cada teatro geopolítico contém variáveis que poderiam transformar riscos calculados em complicações sérias.

Esses elementos imprevisíveis variam de mudanças políticas domésticas nas nações alvo a escaladas regionais mais amplas. A administração deve navegar por cenários onde as ferramentas diplomáticas tradicionais podem se provar insuficientes.

Os principais fatores de risco incluem:

  • Escalada militar não intencional
  • Fragmentação de coalizões regionais
  • Volatilidade do mercado econômico
  • Desafios de coordenação com aliados

A abordagem do presidente assume que o poder americano pode moldar os resultados, mas a história sugere que as intervenções geopolíticas frequentemente produzem resultados inesperados que desafiam as suposições iniciais.

O Fator Carta na Manga

Experts em relações internacionais observam que eventos imprevisíveis frequentemente descarrilam até mesmo as iniciativas de política externa mais cuidadosamente planejadas. A estratégia do presidente Trump deve contar com cenários que desafiam a análise convencional.

A complexidade da geopolítica moderna significa que ações em uma região podem desencadear respostas em áreas aparentemente não relacionadas. Essa interconexão cria um desafio para os formuladores de políticas que buscam resultados claros e lineares.

Considerações que complicam o planejamento estratégico:

  • Mudanças políticas domésticas nas nações alvo
  • Alianças regionais em mutação
  • Disrupções na economia global
  • Crise humanitárias que exigem intervenção

A capacidade da administração de se adaptar a esses desafios emergentes determinará se a abordagem de intervenção máxima atinge seus objetivos pretendidos ou cria novos problemas que exigem recursos adicionais.

Olhando para o Futuro

A política externa assertiva do presidente Trump representa um teste significativo da liderança americana em um mundo cada vez mais multipolar. Os resultados desses engajamentos provavelmente influenciarão as relações internacionais por anos a vir.

A abordagem da administração carrega tanto oportunidades substanciais quanto riscos consideráveis. O sucesso poderia demonstrar uma influência americana renovada, enquanto os contratempos poderiam restringir as opções de política futuras.

Indicadores principais a serem observados:

  • Coordenação de parceiros regionais
  • Eficácia das sanções econômicas
  • Potencial de avanços diplomáticos
  • Gestão de consequências não intencionais

A disposição do presidente para fazer apostas estratégicas ousadas reflete confiança no poder e na resolução americanos. Se essa confiança se mostrar justificada ou não se tornará aparente à medida que essas situações geopolíticas complexas continuarem a evoluir.

Perguntas Frequentes

Qual é a abordagem atual de política externa do presidente Trump?

O presidente Trump adotou uma estratégia de intervenção máxima que permite ação assertiva em múltiplos teatros geopolíticos. Essa abordagem prioriza o engajamento decisório americano sobre os processos diplomáticos cautelosos.

Quais são as regiões principais foco dessa política?

A administração direcionou atenção significativa para a Venezuela e o Irã, entre outros ambientes geopolíticos desafiadores. Essas regiões representam áreas críticas onde os interesses americanos se cruzam com dinâmicas locais complexas.

Quais são os principais riscos associados a essa abordagem?

A estratégia introduz numerosas cartas na manga potenciais, cada uma carregando riscos de escalada ou consequências não intencionais. Esses riscos variam de complicações militares ao isolamento diplomático e disrupções econômicas.

Como isso representa uma mudança em relação à política anterior?

Isso marca uma mudança para um engajamento americano mais direto e assertivo nos assuntos internacionais. A abordagem concede ao presidente flexibilidade substancial para perseguir iniciativas de alto risco com menos restrições.

#United States Politics and Government#United States International Relations#United States Defense and Military Forces#Iraq War (2003-11)#US-Venezuela Conflict (2025- )#Exxon Mobil Corp#Trump, Donald J#Venezuela#Demonstrations, Protests and Riots#Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022)#Oil (Petroleum) and Gasoline#Maduro, Nicolas#Cuba#Denmark#Greenland#Iran

Continue scrolling for more

Irã Acelera Execução de Manifestante Erfan Soltani
Politics

Irã Acelera Execução de Manifestante Erfan Soltani

Erfan Soltani, 26, foi detido em sua casa em Fardis em 8 de janeiro. Quatro dias depois, autoridades notificaram sua família de que uma sentença de morte havia sido emitida e confirmada.

3h
5 min
0
Read Article
How business leaders are responding to Trump's plan to cap credit card interest rates, from JPMorgan to SoFi
Politics

How business leaders are responding to Trump's plan to cap credit card interest rates, from JPMorgan to SoFi

Business leaders like Klarna's CEO support Trump's credit card cap proposal, while major banks and investors warn of risks. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images Donald Trump proposes a 10% cap on credit card interest rates starting January 20, 2026. Business leaders like Klarna's CEO support the cap, while major banks and investors warn of risks. The proposal sparks debate on consumer protection, credit access, and industry profitability. Business leaders have mixed reviews of President Donald Trump's new plan for credit cards. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said on Friday he would call for a one-year cap of 10% on credit card interest rates, arguing that consumers are being "ripped off" by rates that he said can be as high as 20% or 30%. Congress, not the president, has the power to implement such a cap. Similar proposals have previously stalled on Capitol Hill. Major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS, and Citi, warned that a 10% cap could reduce access to credit; others in the financial sector applauded the plan. Here is how business leaders have responded so far Sebastian Siemiatkowski Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO and cofounder of Klarna, at the fintech company's IPO on September 10. Bloomberg / Contributor / Getty Images/Reuters Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski backs Trump's plan. Siemiatkowski told CNBC in an interview on Monday that traditional credit cards are built to encourage consumers to put most of their spending on credit, and then carry big balances at steep interest rates. That dynamic, he said, pushes people to borrow more than they should and results in higher losses, especially among lower-income borrowers. "I think Trump is wise here and is proposing something that makes a lot of sense," Siemiatkowski told CNBC on Monday. "Capitalism is great, but anarchy is not," Siemiatkowski added regarding consumer protection. In another interview with CNN, Siemiatkowski also said that credit card rewards like cash back and airline miles largely benefit wealthier consumers while lower-income cardholders shoulder more of the costs. Jeremy Barnum JPMorgan Chase CFO Jeremy Barnum speaks at the bank's 2025 Investor Day presentation in New York City on May 19. JPMorgan 2025 Investor Day JPMorgan's CFO said that Trump's plan could upend the company's business model. "It's a very competitive business, but we wouldn't be in it if it weren't a good business for us," said Jeremy Barnum during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call. "And in a world where price controls make it no longer a good business, that would present a significant challenge." JPMorgan said on its fourth-quarter earnings call that debit and credit card sales volume rose roughly 7% year over year and described the business as central to its retail-focused offerings. Jamie Dimon JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Alexander Tamargo/Getty Images for America Business Forum The CEO of JPMorgan also weighed in on Trump's credit card proposal. Jamie Dimon told investors on the company's fourth-quarter earnings call that reducing card interest rates could adversely affect customers with lower credit scores by limiting access to credit. "If it happened the way it was described, it would be dramatic," Dimon said. Bill Ackman PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images "This is a mistake, President," Bill Ackman, the billionaire CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, wrote on Friday on X in a now-deleted post. "Without being able to charge rates adequate enough to cover losses and to earn an adequate return on equity, credit card lenders will cancel cards for millions of consumers who will have to turn to loan sharks for credit at rates higher than and on terms inferior to what they previously paid," Ackman added. Ackman said in another post on Saturday that although Trump's goal is one that's "worthy and important," the rate cap is not the way to achieve it. "The best way to bring down rates would be to make it more competitive by making the regulatory regime more conducive to new entrants and new technologies," Ackman wrote. Anthony Noto Mike Ehrmann/TGL/TGL Golf via Getty Images The SoFi CEO believes that his business and consumers could stand to benefit from Trump's credit card rate cap. "If this is enacted — and that's a big if, though part of me hopes it is — we would likely see a significant contraction in industry credit card lending," Anthony Noto wrote in a post on X. "Credit card issuers simply won't be able to sustain profitability at a 10% rate cap." "Consumers, however, will still need access to credit. That creates a large void — one that @SoFi personal loans are well positioned to fill," Noto added. Noto also said that personal loans could be an alternative to addressing debt, though that would make underwriting discipline and borrower education "even more important." Read the original article on Business Insider

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
Repressão em Mwanza: Violência Pós-Eleitoral na Tanzânia
Politics

Repressão em Mwanza: Violência Pós-Eleitoral na Tanzânia

Novas evidências apontam para uma violenta repressão por forças de segurança em Mwanza, Tanzânia, após as eleições de outubro, resultando em execuções e graves violações de direitos humanos.

3h
5 min
0
Read Article
Comediante indonésio enfrenta queixa por blasfêmia por especial da Netflix
Politics

Comediante indonésio enfrenta queixa por blasfêmia por especial da Netflix

Especial da Netflix do comediante Pandji Pragiwaksono gera queixa policial na Indonésia, acendendo debate sobre limites da comédia e liberdade de expressão.

3h
5 min
0
Read Article
Foco de Putin na Ucrânia expõe aliados globais
Politics

Foco de Putin na Ucrânia expõe aliados globais

Um ano após o início do conflito na Ucrânia, os parceiros autoritários de Moscou descobrem que seus laços de segurança com a Rússia podem ser pouco mais que um tigre de papel, com o apoio não se materializando quando mais necessário.

3h
5 min
7
Read Article
Primeiro-Ministro do Canadá cultiva relações com a China em meio a tensões comerciais com os EUA
Politics

Primeiro-Ministro do Canadá cultiva relações com a China em meio a tensões comerciais com os EUA

Primeiro-Ministro Mark Carney faz sua primeira visita oficial a Pequim, marcando um ponto de virada nas relações Canadá-China enquanto Ottawa busca novas parcerias econômicas.

3h
5 min
6
Read Article
China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela
World_news

China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela

China's JY-27A radar didn't appear to be effective during the US raid on Venezuela. US Air Force Photo Venezuela's Chinese air defense radars weren't game-changing during the US raid to capture Maduro. China has touted the effectiveness in combat of radars like its JY-27A. The lack of effect recently raises questions about both the radar and their operators. Venezuela's military had Chinese-made anti-aircraft radars available when the US launched a surprise air assault against the country to capture the country's now-former leader, Nicolás Maduro, earlier this month. They appear to have been of little help. Operation Absolute Resolve involved over 150 US military aircraft, none of which were shot down. A helicopter was hit, reportedly by machine gun fire, but remained operational. Venezuela has a number of China's JY-27A mobile radars, which Beijing has touted as top-of-the-line systems. It has said the radar can detect stealth assets, like the American F-22 and F-35, from over 150 miles away. The success of the surprise raid by US special operators into downtown Caracas, part of a larger mission which involved not only stealth airpower but also older fourth-generation aircraft and helicopters, suggests that something didn't go as planned on defense. That may be on the operators rather than the tech though. After the raid, a Japanese reporter asked a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson what Beijing thought about the "large amount of military equipment" China sold Venezuela apparently being "of little practical use." The Chinese spokesperson responded by condemning the US strike. A destroyed air defense unit at a Venezuelan military base. Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/REUTERS The Chinese-made JY-27A is a long-range radar used for detecting and tracking hostile aircraft in protected airpsace. Introduced in 2014, the radar system consists of a radar mast with multiple antenna panels supported by separate radar and control vehicles. Chinese sources claim it has features designed to reduce jamming. A newer version, the JY-27V, has since been developed. When Venezuela purchased JY-27As from China last year, there were claims that the radars were able to lock onto multiple F-35B fighter jets off the Venezuelan coast, presenting a potential challenge to the one-way transparency advantage of the US military. "That's all well and good," Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Business Insider, "but when it really matters is in a moment of conflict." Perhaps they were unable to withstand sophisticated electromagnetic spectrum attacks, or maybe they were improperly utilized by their operators. Either way, if they weren't effective, they were of little use for air defense. Radar systems are what inform air defense crews on what they'll need to target and what weapons they need to use. "If you don't have functioning radars then you're a sitting duck," he said. US military leaders said that American aircraft were able to overwhelm Venezuelan air defenses, which has been assessed to include a range of Russian-made systems like S-300VM batteries, Buk-M2 systems, and older S-125 Pechora-2M launchers, as well as the Chinese radars. Some of these pieces are capable but aren't the newest variants used by their respective exporters. In the aftermath, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked the effectiveness of the Russian air defenses. Nothing was said about the Chinese radars in that speech. Key to air defense is how the network works together, and the effectiveness of the operator is vital. In Venezuela's case, it may have been lacking the necessary conditions for successful air defense operations. Seven US troops were hurt during the raid in Venezuela over the weekend, a defense official said. US Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Isabel Tanner A study from the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute think tank, which hosts experts on Latin America, assessed Venezuela's air defenses as being in critical condition as of last year. It said that over 60% of its radar fleet was non-operational, combat aviation doesn't fly often, and the country has received little maintenance support and spare parts from its exporters. Venezuela purchased Chinese-made radars and Russian-made surface-to-air missile batteries to modernize its air defenses, but the hardware alone can't make up for internal shortcomings. Analysis by The New York Times found that some of Venezuela's air defense equipment was in storage or not operational, leaving it unprepared for the US attack. Reports also indicated Venezuela's military lacked the spare parts and technical background to keep air defense systems running. Even if the failures are on the part of the Venezuelan military, the ineffective performance of the Russian and Chinese systems sends a "pretty big message," Sobolik said. It elevates confidence in US capabilities while raising questions about those of rivals. US officials said no American aircraft or military personnel were lost during the raid on Venezuela. Of the 150 aircraft and almost 200 American troops involved in the mission, one helicopter took fire and seven troops were injured. Read the original article on Business Insider

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
François de Rugy endossa candidato de direita em Nantes
Politics

François de Rugy endossa candidato de direita em Nantes

Em um movimento inesperado, François de Rugy, ex-líder da esquerda francesa, declarou apoio ao candidato de direita Foulques Chombart de Lauwe em Nantes.

3h
5 min
12
Read Article
Politics

As many as 15,000 feared dead in Iran as regime hunts Starlink devices, activist tells Euronews

Euronews spoke to Ilya Hashemi, a popular online activist whose Telegram channel is a source of reliable news from within Iran, who has been among the few during the ongoing protests to cover and relay the scant information coming out of Iran despite a regime-imposed internet outage.

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
Takaichi do Japão convoca eleição antecipada
Politics

Takaichi do Japão convoca eleição antecipada

A Primeira-ministra Takaichi anunciou planos para uma eleição antecipada no Japão, uma medida estratégica para fortalecer o partido no poder e solidificar o mandato da nova líder.

3h
3 min
8
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Voltar ao inicio