M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Merz declara nova era em Davos
Politica

Merz declara nova era em Davos

Deutsche Welle2h ago
3 min de leitura
📋

Fatos Principais

  • O chanceler alemão Friedrich Merz discursou para líderes mundiais no Fórum de Davos de 2026, proferindo um importante discurso de política externa.
  • Merz caracterizou a atual transformação das relações internacionais como ocorrendo a um ritmo vertiginoso, sugerindo que padrões históricos estão sendo reescritos.
  • O discurso do chanceler sinaliza uma possível mudança na postura da política externa alemã, rumo a um papel mais assertivo nos assuntos globais.
  • O Fórum de Davos proporcionou uma plataforma internacional de alto perfil para anunciar essas prioridades de política aos principais tomadores de decisão globais.
  • A avaliação de Merz implica que o consenso pós-Guerra Fria que guiou as relações internacionais por décadas pode não ser mais suficiente para os desafios contemporâneos.

Resumo Rápido

O chanceler alemão Friedrich Merz fez uma avaliação contundente dos assuntos globais durante seu discurso aos líderes mundiais no Fórum de Davos de 2026. O discurso do chanceler centrou-se na rápida transformação das estruturas internacionais.

As observações de Merz ocorrem em um momento crítico para a diplomacia global, enquanto as nações lidam com alianças em mudança e desafios emergentes. Sua mensagem aos líderes reunidos foi tanto um aviso quanto um chamado à ação.

Um Mundo em Fluxo

A tese central do líder alemão era que o quadro internacional tradicional está passando por uma mudança fundamental. Merz caracterizou essa transformação como ocorrendo a um ritmo vertiginoso, sugerindo que os padrões históricos de diplomacia e cooperação estão sendo reescritos.

Sua avaliação implica que o consenso pós-Guerra Fria, que guiou as relações internacionais por décadas, não é mais suficiente para abordar os desafios contemporâneos. A velocidade dessa mudança parece ter pegado muitos observadores de surpresa.

A antiga ordem mundial está se desfazendo a um ritmo vertiginoso.

A escolha de palavras de Merz indica um afastamento da cautela diplomática, em vez disso, abraçando uma aceitação mais direta da instabilidade global. Essa moldura prepara o terreno para suas recomendações de política subsequentes.

"A antiga ordem mundial está se desfazendo a um ritmo vertiginoso."

— Friedrich Merz, Chanceler da Alemanha

Estabelecendo Novas Prioridades

Contra esse pano de fundo de mudança rápida, o chanceler delineou as prioridades estratégicas da Alemanha para o futuro. Embora os detalhes específicos dessas prioridades não tenham sido totalmente elaborados no relatório inicial, o discurso posicionou claramente a Alemanha como uma participante ativa na formação da paisagem internacional emergente.

O endereço sugere que Berlim está se preparando para um papel mais assertivo nos assuntos globais, indo além dos quadros diplomáticos tradicionais. O discurso de Merz provavelmente abordou áreas-chave onde a Alemanha busca exercer influência, embora o escopo completo dessas iniciativas ainda precise ser detalhado.

  • Adaptar-se às rápidas mudanças geopolíticas
  • Definir novos quadros diplomáticos
  • Estabelecer liderança alemã em novos contextos
  • Responder a desafios globais em evolução

As prioridades delineadas por Merz refletem um reconhecimento de que alianças tradicionais e instituições podem exigir reavaliação à luz das atuais dinâmicas globais.

Davos como Palco

A escolha do Fórum de Davos como local para este anúncio foi estrategicamente significativa. O encontro anual de líderes mundiais, executivos de empresas e especialistas em políticas públicas fornece uma plataforma de alto perfil para anunciar grandes mudanças de política.

Ao se dirigir a esse público, Merz garantiu que sua mensagem alcançaria os principais tomadores de decisão em todo o mundo. A reputação do fórum como um fórum para discutir questões econômicas e políticas globais o torna um cenário ideal para tal declaração.

A edição de 2026 do fórum parece ter sido particularmente focada em questões de ordem e governança internacionais. O discurso de Merz provavelmente ressoou com outros líderes que também estão lidando com as implicações de uma paisagem global em mudança.

Falando para líderes mundiais em Davos...

O público internacional em Davos fornece feedback e contexto imediato para anúncios de política, permitindo que os líderes avaliem as reações de diversas partes interessadas em tempo real.

Implicações para a Alemanha

O discurso de Merz sinaliza uma possível recalibração da política externa alemã. Como a maior economia da Europa e um membro-chave da União Europeia, a postura da Alemanha sobre os assuntos globais tem peso significativo.

O reconhecimento do chanceler de uma ordem mundial em desintegração sugere que Berlim está se preparando para um ambiente internacional mais complexo. Isso pode envolver repensar parcerias tradicionais e explorar novos caminhos para a cooperação.

Os interesses econômicos da Alemanha estão profundamente entrelaçados com a estabilidade global, tornando o aviso do chanceler particularmente relevante para a indústria e o comércio alemães. A comunidade empresarial em Davos teria sido especialmente atenta a essas implicações.

O discurso posiciona a Alemanha como um ator proativo, em vez de reativo, nos assuntos internacionais, potencialmente influenciando como outras nações abordam suas próprias decisões de política externa.

Olhando para o Futuro

O endereço de Davos do Chanceler Merz marca um momento definidor na abordagem da Alemanha para os assuntos globais. Sua avaliação clara da mudança internacional define o tom para futuros desenvolvimentos de política.

Os próximos meses provavelmente revelarão mais detalhes sobre as estratégias específicas da Alemanha para navegar essa nova era. Parceiros internacionais estarão observando de perto para entender como as prioridades de Berlim se alinham com seus próprios interesses.

Enquanto o mundo continua a evoluir a um ritmo sem precedentes, o discurso de Merz serve como um lembrete de que os quadros diplomáticos devem se adaptar para permanecer relevantes. O desafio agora reside em traduzir essas amplas prioridades em ações concretas que possam abordar as complexidades do mundo moderno.

Perguntas Frequentes

O que o chanceler alemão Friedrich Merz disse em Davos 2026?

Merz alertou que a antiga ordem mundial está se desfazendo a um ritmo vertiginoso e estabeleceu prioridades importantes para o futuro. Seu discurso centrou-se na rápida transformação das estruturas internacionais e na resposta da Alemanha a essas mudanças.

Por que o discurso de Merz em Davos é significativo?

O discurso sinaliza uma possível mudança na postura da política externa alemã, rumo a um papel mais assertivo nos assuntos globais. Como a maior economia da Europa, a posição da Alemanha sobre a ordem internacional tem peso significativo para a diplomacia e o comércio globais.

O que significa 'ordem mundial se desfazendo' para as relações internacionais?

Sugere que os quadros diplomáticos e alianças tradicionais podem exigir reavaliação à luz das atuais dinâmicas globais. Isso implica um ambiente internacional mais complexo onde os padrões históricos de cooperação podem não se aplicar mais.

O que acontece depois do anúncio de Merz em Davos?

Os próximos meses provavelmente revelarão mais detalhes sobre as estratégias específicas da Alemanha para navegar essa nova era. Parceiros internacionais estarão observando de perto para entender como as prioridades de Berlim se alinham com seus próprios interesses.

#News

Continue scrolling for more

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas
Technology

IA transforma a pesquisa e as provas matemáticas

A inteligência artificial está se tornando uma realidade na matemática. Modelos de aprendizado de máquina agora geram teoremas originais, forçando uma reavaliação da pesquisa e do ensino.

Just now
4 min
342
Read Article
Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.
Sports

Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.

Big time football — like this month's college football championship — is the most dominant force in American culture. It won't always be that way, writer Chuck Klosterman argues in his new book. Set Number: X164821 TK1 Are you ready for some football? Trick question: America is always ready for more football. It's an appetite without end. But writer Chuck Klosterman, who just devoted a book to the sport, says football's dominance will ultimately be its undoing. The notion that football is the biggest force in American culture and entertainment is so ingrained and obvious that it almost seems like something not worth mentioning. Chuck Klosterman feels otherwise: The pop culture writer just devoted an entire book to the sport, and its meaning and importance. But Klosterman also argues that football won't always be the main thing — and that its overwhelming size and scale will be the thing that eventually undermines it. I talked to Klosterman about all of that, as well as topics like the impact of video games on the sport, and why he thinks paying college football players is good for now, and really damaging in the long run. You can hear our entire conversation on my Channels podcast. What follows are edited excerpts from our chat. Peter Kafka: What is the point of a book called "Football" in 2026? Chuck Klosterman: I have been obsessed with sports and football my entire life. And probably 20 years ago, I made an unspoken, abstract decision — at some point, I want to do a book that's just about sports. My initial idea was that it was going to be about basketball, but I realized that's crazy: If you're writing about something that's part of the culture, football is the sport. It's the only one. If someone said to you, "Explain the last half of the 20th century through some idea, some metaphor," football is the thing to pick. It might not be the case for the 21st century, but it is for the end of the 20th century. And it is for the world we live in right now. One of the big changes in sports — and definitely in football — recently is the legalization of sports betting. It's omnipresent. You seem ambivalent-to-positive about it, which is not where I thought you'd end up. CHUCK: Do I think that gambling in this legalized way is bad for society? I would say probably, for all of the predictable reasons — particularly because it's on your phone and you've put your [financial information] in, so the money does not seem real. Even if it was just a situation where you had to feed dollar bills into it, everything would change. You're taking something that's addictive for some people and marrying it to your phone, which is also addictive for some people. It seems like an obvious way to get in trouble. CHUCK: But for football, it is good. Because it adds a different context for conversation about it. When I have a conversation with other dads, we'll talk about sports a lot, and then there'll be this other conversation. About gambling. We're still technically talking about football, but this is a whole different thing. It has a different context, a different meaning. It says more about the person. Some could argue that it's a weird argument for gambling being good. But if we look at football as a form of entertainment, a distraction, something to consume, to occupy yourself — I think gambling does make it more interesting. This is the pitch from the entire sports gambling industry — it improves the game, it adds stakes, it makes it more interesting. You seem to agree. Certainly there are people who feel that way. I think a lot of people I know who do a lot of gambling, they have a sort of mixed feelings about it — I think it does bother them that suddenly the game seems meaningless if they're not gambling on it. But for me, as somebody who doesn't really put money into it, I find it a fascinating thing. Like: Indiana was an eight-and-a-half point favorite [in Monday's college football championship game]. They did not cover. But the meaning of eight-and-a-half points in a spread suggests that the gambling markets believe it will be a blowout. That's different than saying, "I think Indiana's gonna win easily." I find it to be much more intriguing than I would've thought. I was definitely against the idea of sports betting. Ideologically, I thought, "This is bad." And like I say, socially it probably is. But for each individual sport … You argue that football's grip on America will eventually collapse. How will that happen? Football is not just the most popular thing, or just too big to fail. It is too big to stop expanding. It has to constantly get bigger. The financial demands of it, the amount of revenue it has to make, can only go up. The NFL only operates from the position of "How can we stretch out further? Can we even swallow up all the other sports? Can we expand into Europe and all of these things?" And right now, that's a successful thing. The more they make, the more people consume, the more people spend on it —most importantly, the TV networks and streamers who need it. And the depth of caring is so deep. If football went away this fall for whatever reason, people will be like, "What am I gonna bet on? What is my life gonna be like? Who am I? What's my identity if I'm not a fan of this team?" You really saw this during COVID. "We're still playing college football. No one's in their classes, but we gotta play these games. We can't not play them." So it's really brittle, right? It's a system that has to keep going. But I think at some point there is going to be a change. Probably in advertising. It's not that advertising is going to disappear. It's just that what it costs to buy an ad during a football game … it's not going be worth the trade off. So let's say it gets to be a point when Fox or Amazon Prime, or whoever's carrying these games, renegotiates their NFL contract and for the first time, the number doesn't go up. Maybe even the number goes down. [That puts the] NFL's in this weird position — they have to take their best offer. Then the players will say, "There's no way we're going to take less money. There's no way we're going to start playing 22 games just because you're not making enough money from CBS. We're going to strike." Or the owners will be like, "We're going to lock the players out" [because they can't afford to pay them] — like what's happened with baseball. If that happened now, it would be this American calamity, where people would freak out. But as people have less and less of a personal relationship to the game when this happens in the future, they'll be like, "Well, that's an entertaining distraction. I can replace it with something else." Something has to be part of your life for it to be so important that you'll do whatever you can to keep it going. Why will fans have less of a relationship to football? The comparison I use is horse racing. In the 1920s, along with boxing and baseball, it was the biggest sport. And in the 1920s, the average person still had a real relationship to the culture of horses. They had a blue-collar job, and horses were still doing some of the labor. Or their dad had a horse farm. They definitely saw horses all the time. The horse was part of the world in which they lived. That is no longer the case. Now, horse racing is just for people who own horses and people who gamble on it. That's really all it is. My fear is that football's gonna put itself in a position where it's too big. Its tentacles reach too far. And people will say, "Well, I guess we'll choose something else." And when it collapses, something that size collapses hard. It kind of implodes on itself. I'm not one of these people [who complain about capitalism]. But I do think some of the problems of capitalism are easiest seen through sports leagues, which are smaller simulations of society. And what's happening with the way money operates in pro and college football, it seems precarious to me. The financial side's changing in an exponential way. And when society shifts, it's the big things that can't. They're not nimble. The small things can. Read the original article on Business Insider

49m
3 min
0
Read Article
Irmãos constroem negócio de 6 dígitos na Turo em menos de 2 anos
Lifestyle

Irmãos constroem negócio de 6 dígitos na Turo em menos de 2 anos

Michael Rumph e Darlene Person transformaram o Toyota Corolla de 2016 de sua mãe em um império de aluguel de carros em Atlanta, provando que planejamento estratégico e trabalho em equipe familiar podem criar um negócio lateral lucrativo.

50m
5 min
6
Read Article
Politics

World Cup 2026: Could Europe drive a boycott?

Just as it did in Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022, politics is dominating the build up to World Cup 2026. Could discontent with Donald Trump in Europe see football heavyweights united behind such a cause?

51m
3 min
0
Read Article
Newsom Blames Trump for Cancellation of His Davos Appearance
Politics

Newsom Blames Trump for Cancellation of His Davos Appearance

Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said the Trump administration had denied him entry to an American venue at the World Economic Forum. It’s not clear if the administration was responsible.

52m
3 min
0
Read Article
Crew 11 retorna à Terra após término antecipado da missão
Science

Crew 11 retorna à Terra após término antecipado da missão

A tripulação da Crew 11, composta por astronautas dos EUA, Japão e Rússia, retornou com segurança à Terra em 15 de janeiro após uma missão na Estação Espacial Internacional que foi encurtada devido a um problema médico.

52m
5 min
0
Read Article
Prefeito de Bordeaux aceita mediação em meio a disputa sobre transparência orçamentária
Politics

Prefeito de Bordeaux aceita mediação em meio a disputa sobre transparência orçamentária

O prefeito de Bordeaux, Thomas Cazenave, aceitou mediação judicial proposta para resolver disputa com a oposição sobre transparência orçamentária e divulgação de dados financeiros.

52m
5 min
6
Read Article
EUA transferem 7.000 prisioneiros do EI para o Iraque em meio à mudança na Síria
World_news

EUA transferem 7.000 prisioneiros do EI para o Iraque em meio à mudança na Síria

O exército dos EUA começou a transferir até 7.000 detentos do Estado Islâmico da Síria nordeste para o Iraque, em meio ao governo sírio afirmando controle sobre territórios curdos.

54m
5 min
0
Read Article
Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.
Politics

Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.

Whole milk, yuck. Getty Images; BI The government's latest dietary guidelines suggest people drink whole milk instead of low-fat. This matters a lot for school lunches, where whole milk will get top billing. But for the rest of us: Who actually prefers sludgy, thick whole milk over crisp skim? Yuck! I refuse the long arm of the government's reach into my refrigerator: I'm not drinking whole milk! And I readily accept that food is political, so the fact that the latest dietary guidelines from the US government — which say to drink whole milk instead of skim — are being seen as the latest political battle isn't a surprise. But there's something in the latest whole milk debate that is truly confusing to me. It's that … whole milk isn't very good? And I don't think many of us have felt we couldn't drink it because of government guidelines. We just don't like it! Whole milk as a win for freedom? Secretary of Health and full-fat dairy booster Robert Kennedy Jr. is a polarizing figure, so people are going to interpret this kind of video in a way that fits their worldview: 🥛 pic.twitter.com/QUeSfR7EC8 — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) January 15, 2026 The government is positioning this change as people being desperate to drink whole milk but feeling they weren't allowed to. That they were forced to settle for skim or 2% milk, and finally, thanks to the Trump administration, are allowed the verboten pleasures again. Here's MY beef: Whole milk is gross. Whole milk is too sludgy, too thick. It always kind of smells like it's on its way to turning sour. I find the white residue it leaves on the sides of a glass off-putting. Yuck. One-percent milk is crisp, drinkable, watery, cold, and refreshing. Great to drink on its own or as a bath for cereal. Personally, I think skim is too watery, and 2% too close to whole, but I accept those options as well. For me, it's not any fear of fat intake that has kept me from buying whole milk; it's that whole milk is stinky and gross. I should note here that the health benefits of whole vs. low-fat milk are a living, breathing debate. Whole milk has more saturated fat, which is potentially "bad," but it has more vitamins and enzymes or whatever, which are potentially "good." (Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist here, people! Don't trust me — do your own research.) If you're truly interested in learning more about the details of the health benefits of dairy, I suggest you read this instead of listening to me whine about my personal milk preference. Don't listen to me about healthy food choices; my doctor shook her head sadly and said "noooooo" when I told her what kinds of garbage I typically eat for dinner (yes, my cholesterol is high). For me, worrying about the milkfat content of my cereal is like worrying about which multivitamin brand to buy when I often go days without eating a fresh vegetable. I'm stuffing so many chemicals and processed garbage down my gullet on the reg that any kind of milk is the healthiest thing I'll consume by far. Robert F. Kennedy presents the new "Dietary Guidelines for Americans," which include favoring whole milk. Yuck. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Yes, I'm sure there are some of you out there who are adult whole milk fans and prefer it over skim. Like whole milk? Know that I see you, I accept you, and you are valid. It's fine to have a taste preference. But I simply don't believe there are throngs of adults out there who've been feeling forced to choke down 2% when they were dying for whole milk. You're a grownup! Buy whatever milk you like! Of course, the main point of the latest guidelines isn't really aimed at making suggestions to adults. The actionable part of the guidelines is that they inform the rules for federal food programs for kids, like the National School Lunch Program, which previously only allowed low-fat milk options. I don't really care if a kid prefers whole or skim milk with their sloppy Joe or PB&J — either option seems better to me than chocolate milk, which, according to my own elementary school children, is what everyone chooses at lunch anyway. If the government is going to start meddling more with school lunches, frankly, I'd welcome them to start with the abusive fee structure in some of the digital lunch payment systems that many districts have adopted. My kids' school uses a payment provider for lunches that charges a $3.50 fee every time you add money to your kid's account (and requires separate accounts per sibling). President Trump, please look into that. For me, I am not going to change my milk-drinking ways. I was raised in a 1% household. I will continue to buy 1% because it's delicious, and whole milk is gross, and Uncle Sam can't tell me what to do. Read the original article on Business Insider

54m
3 min
0
Read Article
Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell estudam perspectivas financeiras dos EUA
Cryptocurrency

Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell estudam perspectivas financeiras dos EUA

Uma colaboração entre o Instituto de Política Bitcoin, Fedi e Cornell University investigará como os americanos percebem a privacidade financeira em um momento de aumento da regulação.

1h
5 min
7
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Voltar ao inicio