Apagão de Internet no Irã: Uma Mudança Permanente?
Politica

Apagão de Internet no Irã: Uma Mudança Permanente?

Deutsche Welle16h ago
3 min de leitura
📋

Fatos Principais

  • O atual apagão de comunicação no Irã é descrito como 'mais sério' do que nunca.
  • Especialistas alertam que as restrições atuais podem se tornar permanentes, durando além dos protestos atuais.
  • Isso marca uma possível mudança de desligamentos temporários para uma estratégia de longo prazo de isolamento digital.
  • A situação preocupou observadores internacionais e órgãos como as Nações Unidas.

O Cerco Digital

A paisagem digital no Irã está passando por uma transformação profunda e alarmante. O atual apagão de comunicação está sendo descrito por observadores como mais sério do que qualquer iteração anterior, marcando uma escalada significativa no controle estatal sobre a informação.

Embora desligamentos de internet tenham sido historicamente usados como uma ferramenta temporária durante períodos de agitação civil, análises emergentes sugerem uma nova possibilidade preocupante: essas restrições podem não ser levantadas quando os protestos atuais diminuírem. Essa mudança pode sinalizar uma reestruturação permanente de como o Irã se conecta com o resto do mundo.

Gravidade Sem Precedentes

A escala e o escopo das restrições atuais atraíram atenção imediata. Apagões anteriores, embora disruptivos, eram muitas vezes parciais ou contornáveis com ferramentas técnicas. A situação atual, no entanto, parece ser projetada para máximo impacto e durabilidade.

Especialistas monitorando a situação notam que a infraestrutura de controle é mais robusta do que nunca. Isso sugere uma mudança estratégica de desligamentos reativos para uma estratégia proativa de longo prazo de isolamento digital.

  • Interrupção generalizada de serviços de dados móveis
  • Restrição severa da largura de banda internacional
  • Bloqueio direcionado de plataformas de comunicação
  • Aumento do monitoramento do tráfego de rede doméstico

"As restrições podem durar além dos protestos atuais."

— Especialista monitorando a situação

Uma Mudança na Estratégia

A preocupação principal entre os analistas é o potencial dessas medidas se tornarem permanentes. Isso representa uma mudança fundamental na abordagem do Estado para a internet, passando de vê-la como um utilitário necessário para tratá-la como um privilégio controlado.

As restrições podem durar além dos protestos atuais.

Essa avaliação destaca um ponto crítico. Se as restrições permanecerem em vigor, criaria efetivamente uma cortina de ferro digital, isolando a população iraniana do discurso global e dos fluxos de informação. As consequências de longo prazo para a educação, o comércio e a liberdade pessoal seriam imensas.

Implicações Globais

A situação no Irã está sendo observada de perto pela comunidade internacional, incluindo órgãos como as Nações Unidas. Um apagão de comunicação permanente estabelece um precedente perigoso para outros regimes autoritários que buscam controlar suas populações.

Isso desafia a própria noção de uma internet global e aberta. A capacidade dos cidadãos de se comunicar livremente, acessar informações diversas e se organizar pacificamente é uma pedra angular da sociedade moderna. Minimizar isso traz riscos que se estendem muito além das fronteiras do Irã.

O Custo Humano

Além das dimensões técnicas e políticas, reside o profundo custo humano. Um apagão permanente cortaria linhas vitais para milhões de iranianos.

Famírias seriam separadas, empreendedores perderiam acesso a mercados globais e estudantes seriam privados de recursos educacionais internacionais. O isolamento seria total, impactando cada faceta da vida diária e criando um vácuo de informação difícil de compreender na era moderna.

Olhando para o Futuro

O mundo está em um ponto crítico em relação ao futuro da internet no Irã. O apagão atual não é apenas uma medida temporária, mas um potencial presságio de uma nova realidade digital permanentemente restrita.

Indicadores importantes a serem observados incluem a persistência das restrições de dados móveis após o fim dos protestos e quaisquer declarações oficiais sobre o futuro da intranet nacional. As decisões tomadas nas próximas semanas determinarão se o Irã permanecerá conectado ao mundo ou entrará em um estado prolongado de isolamento digital.

"mais sério do que nunca antes"

— Observadores do apagão de comunicação iraniano

Perguntas Frequentes

Qual é a situação atual da internet no Irã?

O Irã está passando por um intenso apagão de comunicação que especialistas descrevem como mais sério do que casos anteriores. Há preocupações significativas de que essas restrições possam não ser temporárias e se tornarem uma característica permanente.

Por que este apagão é diferente dos anteriores?

Historicamente, o Irã usou desligamentos de internet como uma medida temporária durante protestos. A análise atual sugere uma mudança estratégica, com a infraestrutura e a intenção apontando para um estado de conectividade restrita de longo prazo, potencialmente permanente.

Quais são as consequências potenciais de um apagão permanente?

Um apagão permanente levaria a um profundo isolamento para o povo iraniano, cortando-os da comunicação global, do comércio e da informação. Isso estabeleceria um precedente perigoso para o autoritarismo digital em todo o mundo.

#World

Continue scrolling for more

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан
Economics

С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан

Опубликованная в «Финансовом журнале» НИФИ Минфина статья «Финансирование долговременного ухода в России: возможен ли переход к страховой модели?» предлагает расчеты нескольких сценариев, в которых работа системы долговременного ухода (СДУ) будет покрываться дополнительными соцвзносами. Изъять необходимые суммы в размере 0,5–3 трлн руб. в год из фонда оплаты труда предлагается добавочными платежами по ставке от 1% до 5% зарплаты в зависимости от охвата ухода. Дискуссия о средствах для системы ведется с самого начала ее реализации, но сама она уже вписана в нацпроект, а при напряженном бюджете рассчитывать на ее финансирование за счет нынешних госдоходов вряд ли можно, так что де-факто авторы поднимают вопрос о том, сколько и за какой уход в старости граждане готовы доплатить.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Voltar ao inicio