M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Israel Orders Football Pitch Demolition in Aida Refugee Camp
Politique

Israel Orders Football Pitch Demolition in Aida Refugee Camp

Israeli authorities have ordered the demolition of a football pitch in the Aida refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. The order cites the expansion of the separation barrier.

Sky News Arabia20h ago
5 min de lecture
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1Israeli authorities have issued a demolition order for a football pitch located within the densely populated Aida refugee camp in the occupied West Bank.
  • 2The order, issued on January 13, 2026, cites the need to clear space for the construction of the Israeli separation barrier.
  • 3The pitch serves as a vital recreational and community space for residents of the camp.This move has raised concerns among local residents and observers regarding the shrinking of available public spaces in the refugee camp.
  • 4The separation barrier, a contentious infrastructure project, has been a source of friction for years.

Contents

The Demolition OrderLife in Aida CampThe Separation BarrierCommunity ImpactLooking Ahead

Quick Summary#

Israeli authorities have ordered the demolition of a football pitch in the Aida refugee camp, located in the occupied West Bank. The order specifically targets a sports facility situated within the densely populated camp.

The decision is reportedly linked to the ongoing construction of the Israeli separation barrier in the area. This infrastructure project is a significant point of contention in the region. The loss of the football pitch represents a reduction of vital community space for the camp's residents.

The Demolition Order#

The order to destroy the football pitch was formally issued by Israeli authorities. It targets a specific sports ground within the boundaries of the Aida refugee camp, a well-known camp situated near Bethlehem.

The official justification provided for the demolition is the need to clear the land for the continuation of the separation barrier. This wall and fence system is being built by Israel along and within the West Bank. The order places the future of the community sports facility in immediate jeopardy.

  • Order issued by Israeli authorities
  • Target: Football pitch in Aida refugee camp
  • Reason: Construction of the separation barrier
  • Location: Occupied West Bank

Life in Aida Camp#

The Aida refugee camp is described as being highly congested or maktush in Arabic, meaning it is packed with residents. Established in 1949, the camp is home to thousands of Palestinian refugees. Space within the camp's confines is extremely limited.

Public facilities, such as sports fields, are therefore critical for the community. They provide essential outlets for youth and serve as gathering places. The removal of such a facility impacts the social fabric and well-being of the camp's inhabitants. The camp is located in an area that has been heavily affected by the presence of the separation barrier, with the wall running extremely close to the camp's edges.

The Separation Barrier#

The separation barrier is a physical structure that Israel began constructing in 2002. Its stated purpose is to prevent attacks originating from the West Bank. However, its route frequently deviates from the Green Line, the internationally recognized armistice line between Israel and the West Bank.

International courts and bodies have deemed sections of the barrier to be illegal under international law. The barrier's construction has resulted in the confiscation of land and the disruption of Palestinian communities. The Aida camp is one of the communities most directly impacted by this infrastructure. The barrier effectively encloses the camp from several sides.

The barrier's route frequently deviates from the Green Line, the internationally recognized armistice line.

Community Impact#

The demolition of the football pitch is not an isolated event. It represents a broader pattern of restrictions on development and movement for Palestinians in Area C of the West Bank. Area C remains under full Israeli military and civil control.

Residents of Aida camp face numerous challenges, including high unemployment and limited access to resources. Recreational spaces offer a form of relief and normalcy. The destruction of the pitch removes a key asset for youth engagement. It further constricts the physical and social boundaries of the camp.

  • Limited space for development in the camp
  • Impact on youth and sports activities
  • Consequences of the barrier's proximity
  • Broader context of land control in Area C

Looking Ahead#

The order to demolish the football pitch in Aida refugee camp underscores the tangible effects of the separation barrier on Palestinian communities. It highlights the conflict between Israeli security infrastructure and the daily needs of West Bank residents. The future of the camp's public spaces remains uncertain as the barrier project continues. This event serves as a stark example of how geopolitical decisions manifest in the loss of local community assets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Israeli authorities have ordered the demolition to clear the land for the construction of the separation barrier. The barrier is being built to secure the area, according to Israeli officials.

The Aida refugee camp is located in the occupied West Bank, near the city of Bethlehem. It is situated very close to the separation barrier.

The order was issued by Israeli authorities. These authorities maintain civil and security control over large parts of the West Bank, including Area C.

Israel says the barrier is necessary to prevent attacks. However, its route cuts deep into the West Bank and is considered illegal by the International Court of Justice. It has a major impact on Palestinian life and movement.

Continue scrolling for more

Kuaishou entre sur le marché de la dette mondiale avec des obligations à double devise
Economics

Kuaishou entre sur le marché de la dette mondiale avec des obligations à double devise

Kuaishou entre sur le marché de la dette mondiale avec une émission à double devise (USD/CNY) pour les investisseurs professionnels, marquant une diversification stratégique de ses financements.

2h
5 min
0
Read Article
Trump met l'Iran en garde sur les exécutions de manifestants
Politics

Trump met l'Iran en garde sur les exécutions de manifestants

L'Iran prépare l'exécution d'un autre manifestant. Donald Trump a émis un avertissement sévère. Le bilan des victimes dépasse 2 400.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
L'excédent commercial record de la Chine défie les tarifs de Trump
Economics

L'excédent commercial record de la Chine défie les tarifs de Trump

Malgré les tensions commerciales renouvelées, le volume commercial de la Chine a atteint des sommets en 2025. Pékin a signalé des plans pour une ouverture économique accrue en 2026.

2h
5 min
0
Read Article
L'industrie de la défense européenne cherche du capital privé
Economics

L'industrie de la défense européenne cherche du capital privé

L'Europe fait face à un dilemme financier : comment financer une expansion massive de ses capacités militaires tout en gérant des niveaux de dette record. La solution pourrait venir de Wall Street et des capitaux privés.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
Les partisans du Bitcoin font pression sur le Congrès concernant les règles fiscales des stablecoins
Cryptocurrency

Les partisans du Bitcoin font pression sur le Congrès concernant les règles fiscales des stablecoins

Les partisans de la cryptomonnaie demandent au Congrès d'élargir les exemptions fiscales au-delà des stablecoins pour simplifier les paiements quotidiens et stimuler l'adoption.

3h
5 min
12
Read Article
Le dilemme constitutionnel à haut risque de Sébastien Lecornu
Politics

Le dilemme constitutionnel à haut risque de Sébastien Lecornu

Le Premier ministre Sébastien Lecornu affronte un dilemme constitutionnel majeur pour faire adopter le budget national, confronté à un choix entre briser une promesse ou utiliser des ordonnances.

3h
5 min
8
Read Article
Politics

Death toll from Iran's crackdown on protests jumps to at least 2,571, activists say

The figure analysts say dwarfs the death toll from any other round of protest or unrest in Iran in decades and recalls the chaos surrounding the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own
Politics

Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own

US Vice President JD Vance will host Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers for talks on Wednesday.

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

3h
5 min
6
Read Article
Read Jerome Powell's letter to senators following his testimony about renovations to the Fed building
Politics

Read Jerome Powell's letter to senators following his testimony about renovations to the Fed building

Jerome Powell, a particularly mild-mannered speaker, slammed recent attempts to intimidate his department. Li Yuanqing/Xinhua via Getty Images The DOJ is probing Jerome Powell over his congressional testimony about the Fed building renovations. Powell sent a letter, dated July 14, 2025, to senators about the renovations. The letter provided expansive detail about the Fed building's history, repairs, and budget. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell sent a letter dated July 14, 2025, to key senators on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, following his testimony before Congress about renovations to the central bank buildings. In it, the Fed chair gave lawmakers a detailed and expansive response to inquiries about the renovations. Powell's letter to the Senate Banking Committee, obtained by Business Insider, was sent 10 days before giving President Donald Trump and other White House officials a tour of the renovation site on July 24, 2025. Powell announced via video message on January 11 that the Department of Justice served grand jury subpoenas to the Federal Reserve. He said the probe is into his June testimony about renovations at historic Fed office buildings, but warned that it was a pressure tactic over interest rates. "This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions — or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna accused Powell of misleading Congress and sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department, though it's unclear whether that prompted the DOJ investigation. The letter to Sen. Tim Scott, chairman of the committee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the ranking member, outlines the history of the Fed's Washington, DC, buildings, offers details about the repairs and working conditions, and provides information about the cost of the project's budget. The letter was first reported by the Financial Times. Powell wrote that the Federal Reserve Board "believes it is of the utmost importance to provide transparency for our decisions and to be accountable to the public through the Congress for our work." During Powell's testimony in June, Scott said the Fed's more than $2 billion renovation of its headquarters was excessive and likened it to the "Palace of Versailles." Powell responded that many features Scott mentioned no longer exist, such as beehives, a VIP elevator, and water features, but added that the Marriner S. Eccles Building urgently needed safety upgrades and hadn't been meaningfully renovated before work began in 2022. The White House and the Federal Reserve Board did not immediately respond to a request for comments. Read the full letter: Dear Chairman Scott and Ranking Member Warren: I am writing to follow up on your interest in the Federal Reserve Board's (Board) Marriner S. Eccles Building (Eccles Building) and 1951 Constitution Avenue Building project. The Board believes it is of the utmost importance to provide transparency for our decisions and to be accountable to the public through the Congress for our work. We take seriously our commitment to transparency. We respect the critical importance of the constitutionally-derived congressional oversight of our activities, and we are committed to working collaboratively and cooperatively with you. In advance of Board staff discussing the project in further detail with your staff as you have requested, I wanted to share a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the project and provide you with additional information. The FAQs address the project goals, engagement with state and federal entities, cost drivers, and various features of the project. The FAQs are enclosed and are also on our public website.1 For historical perspective, the Eccles Building was constructed between 1935 and 1937 as the headquarters for the Federal Reserve Board. The 1951 Constitution Avenue Building was constructed in 1932 for the U.S. Public Health Service. Over its history, it housed a variety of government agencies, including the Combined Chiefs of Staff during World War II, the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of the Interior. Both buildings are listed in the District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites, and the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. While periodic work has been done to keep the buildings occupiable, neither building has seen a comprehensive renovation since they were constructed. For some time, significant structural repairs and other updates were needed for the Eccles Building. Similarly, the vacant and dilapidated 1951 Constitution Avenue Building, across the street from the Eccles Building, needed significant repairs and updating. Despite its condition, the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building provided an opportunity for the Board to consolidate its operations and reduce expenses over time on leased space in commercial office buildings elsewhere. In 2017, the General Services Administration (GSA) approached us about our interest in taking over the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building. In 2018, GSA transferred sole control of the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building to the Board. In a press release announcing the transfer in 2018, GSA's Public Buildings Service Commissioner stated "This transfer will put a vacant building back in productive use, allow the Federal Reserve Board to consolidate several leases and result in savings for taxpayers."2 To address the significant state of disrepair and unsafe working conditions, the Board is undertaking a complete overhaul and modernization of these two historic buildings. This includes remediation and updates to make the buildings safe, healthy, and effective places to work by removing asbestos and lead contamination and accommodating modern workplace technology. The project has also involved the complete replacement of antiquated systems that are beyond their useful life, such as electrical; plumbing; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; and fire detection and suppression systems. As part of the project, the Board has undertaken major structural work to bring the buildings up to modern code, including current accessibility, security, and safety standards. Throughout the process, the Board chose to consult with a range of state and federal agencies including the Commission on Fine Arts, the District of Columbia's Public Space Committee and its State Historic Preservation Office, the National Park Service, and the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). As discussed in the enclosed FAQs, although the Board is generally not subject to the jurisdiction of the NCPC, historically the Board has submitted building project designs to the NCPC and worked with the NCPC to address their feedback. In recognition of the historic nature of both buildings and their prominent location on the National Mall, the project identified key architectural features to preserve the historic integrity of the buildings, such as stonework, including marble, façades, meeting rooms, and other spaces. Historic preservation work in the Eccles Building also includes elevators that are original to the building, and historic conference rooms. Construction involving the preservation of historic spaces requires specialized processes and methods, which are generally more complex and have increased costs compared with new construction or renovation of spaces that are not historically significant or located on the National Mall. Various factors drove cost increases following the NCPC's final approval of site and building plans in 2021. These factors include differences over time between original estimates and actual costs of materials, equipment, and labor, and unforeseen conditions in the properties, such as more asbestos than anticipated, toxic contamination in the soil, and a higher-than- expected water table. As is to be expected in the major renovation of nearly 100-year-old historic buildings, the Board's designs have continued to evolve over the course of the project, and some features of the buildings, including rooftop spaces and new water features on the building grounds, were scaled back or eliminated as the project moved forward. These changes simplified the project and reduced the likelihood of further delays and cost overruns. None of them added cost to the project. We do not consider these changes to be substantial. With respect to the specific concerns that were discussed at the hearing, I would like to provide additional detail regarding various elements of the project: • The Eccles and 1951 Constitution Avenue buildings were originally built with marble in the façades and stonework. The project has salvaged the original exterior marble to be reinstalled and will use new domestic marble sourced from Georgia in places where the original was damaged or where needed to keep with historic preservation guidelines and to address concerns raised by external review agencies. • The original elevators are being rehabilitated, including an elevator that services historic conference rooms. A short (eighteen inch) extension of this rehabilitated elevator will make the space more accessible for people with disabilities. There are no elevators where access is limited to governors. There are no VIP dining rooms being constructed as part of the project. The Eccles Building has historic multi-use rooms that are used as conference rooms and for mealtime meetings, which are being renovated and preserved. • Although the Board's initial design included new water features for 1951 Constitution Avenue, they have been eliminated. Fountains that were original to the Eccles Building are being restored. • The ground-level front lawn of 1951 Constitution Avenue serves as the roof of the parking structure beneath. It was referred to as a "garden terrace" in the 2021 submission to the National Capital Planning Commission. There are other references to "vegetated roofs," often referred to as green roofs, which are commonly used to help with stormwater management and to increase building efficiency and roof longevity. Green roofs are found on other federal government buildings, like the Departments of Justice, Interior, and many others, and are encouraged by the General Services Administration.3 We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources as we fulfill the duties given to us by Congress on behalf of the American people. We have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen since it was first approved by the Board in 2017. The project has been subject to annual budget approval by the Board since then. In addition to oversight by members of the Board, our independent Inspector General (IG) has had full access to project information on costs, contracts, schedules, and expenditures and receives monthly reports on the construction program. The Board's IG conducted an audit in 2021 to assess the Board's process for planning and managing multiple renovation projects as well as procuring services under various renovation-related contracts. I have asked the Board's IG to take a fresh look at the project. I hope you find this additional information helpful. Sincerely, Jerome H Powell Read the original article on Business Insider

3h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Retour a l'accueil