M
MercyNews
Home
Back
El débil trimestre de P&G prepara el escenario para un año más fuerte
Economics

El débil trimestre de P&G prepara el escenario para un año más fuerte

CNBC5d ago
3 min de lectura
📋

Hechos Clave

  • El reciente informe trimestral de P&G se caracterizó por ser débil, sin cumplir las expectativas del mercado.
  • El principal impulsor de los decepcionantes resultados fue un cierre del gobierno que afectó aproximadamente dos tercios del trimestre.
  • El análisis de mercado enmarca el período difícil como un 'evento de despeje', sugiriendo que resuelve problemas que podrían haber obstaculizado el rendimiento futuro.
  • La conclusión del cierre se ve como un catalizador positivo, preparando el escenario para mejores resultados en el próximo año.
  • El rendimiento futuro de la empresa ahora se espera que se juzgue por sus méritos operativos en lugar de interrupciones externas.

Resumen Rápido

El reciente trimestre financiero para P&G resultó ser un desafío, con un rendimiento que no cumplió las expectativas. Este resultado, sin embargo, no se ve como un signo de debilidad fundamental, sino como un reinicio necesario.

Los analistas de mercado caracterizan el período como un evento de despeje—una fase difícil que allana el camino para mejores resultados en el futuro. El principal factor que influyó en este trimestre fue un cierre del gobierno significativo, que creó una amplia interrupción.

El Impacto del Cierre

El cierre del gobierno proyectó una larga sombra sobre los resultados del trimestre, creando un entorno de incertidumbre y fricción operativa. Este evento externo no fue una nota menor, sino una fuerza dominante que dio forma a las métricas de rendimiento de la empresa.

De acuerdo con el análisis, la influencia del cierre fue extensa, afectando aproximadamente dos tercios del trimestre. Esta línea de tiempo indica que la interrupción no se limitó a un período breve, sino que fue un desafío sostenido que impactó las operaciones, el sentimiento del consumidor y la estabilidad del mercado.

El alcance del impacto del cierre incluyó:

  • Logística de la cadena de suministro interrumpida
  • Reducción de la confianza del gasto del consumidor
  • Procesos regulatorios retrasados
  • Mayor incertidumbre económica

"No esperábamos un informe fuerte, dado que aproximadamente dos tercios del trimestre fueron afectados por el cierre del gobierno."

— Análisis de Mercado

Un Evento de Despeje

Aunque los números principales fueron débiles, la narrativa subyacente es de posicionamiento estratégico. El trimestre difícil se está interpretando como un evento de despeje, un concepto que sugiere que la empresa ha superado un período de importantes vientos en contra.

Este encuadre implica que los desafíos enfrentados durante el período de cierre han sido absorbidos y abordados. En lugar de llevar problemas no resueltos hacia adelante, P&G ha efectivamente despejado el camino, creando una pizarra más limpia para el resto del año fiscal.

No esperábamos un informe fuerte, dado que aproximadamente dos tercios del trimestre fueron afectados por el cierre del gobierno.

El análisis sugiere que al enfrentar estas presiones externas de frente, la empresa ha eliminado una variable clave que de otro modo podría haber nublado el rendimiento futuro. Esto permite un camino más directo hacia el crecimiento en trimestres posteriores.

Preparando el Escenario

Con el período disruptivo ahora en el pasado, el enfoque se traslada a la trayectoria futura. El concepto de evento de despeje es central para la perspectiva positiva, sugiriendo que lo peor ahora está detrás de la empresa.

El camino hacia adelante parece más prometedor porque el principal obstáculo—el cierre del gobierno—ha concluido. Esta resolución permite que las operaciones comerciales se normalicen y que la confianza del consumidor potencialmente se recupere.

Los factores clave que apoyan un mejor año por delante incluyen:

  • Cese del cierre del gobierno
  • Retorno al ritmo operativo normal
  • Resolución de incertidumbres regulatorias y económicas
  • Base para un nuevo impulso de crecimiento

El análisis indica que la empresa ahora está posicionada para capitalizar las oportunidades del mercado sin la sombra de los eventos disruptivos del trimestre anterior.

Viendo hacia Adelante

La narrativa que rodea el rendimiento de P&G ha cambiado de una de preocupación a una de optimismo cauteloso. El trimestre débil ya no se ve de forma aislada, sino como parte de una historia más grande de resiliencia y posicionamiento estratégico.

Los inversores y observadores del mercado estarán buscando señales de que el evento de despeje se ha traducido en mejoras tangibles. Los próximos trimestres serán críticos para validar esta perspectiva y demostrar la capacidad de la empresa para aprovechar su renovada estabilidad operativa.

La conclusión clave es que un período difícil, impulsado por factores externos, ha sido navegado con éxito. La empresa ahora entra en una fase donde su rendimiento se juzgará por sus propios méritos, libre de las limitaciones del cierre anterior.

Preguntas Frecuentes

¿Qué causó el débil rendimiento trimestral de P&G?

El débil rendimiento trimestral fue causado principalmente por un cierre del gobierno. Este evento externo afectó las operaciones durante aproximadamente dos tercios del trimestre, creando una interrupción significativa.

¿Por qué el trimestre débil se considera un 'evento de despeje'?

El trimestre difícil se ve como un 'evento de despeje' porque ha resuelto el principal desafío externo. Al superar este período, la empresa está posicionada para operar sin las interrupciones anteriores, preparando el escenario para un mejor año por delante.

¿Cuál es la perspectiva para P&G en el futuro?

La perspectiva para P&G es positiva. Con el cierre del gobierno concluido, se espera que la empresa experimente un mejor rendimiento en el próximo año, aprovechando un entorno operativo más estable.

Continue scrolling for more

Despite the hype, AI hasn't changed work — yet
Technology

Despite the hype, AI hasn't changed work — yet

"When we asked our employees to take mandatory training for AI," says Francine Katsoudas, chief people, policy, and purpose officer as Cisco, "it actually had a bit of a negative impact." Riana Daehler Ever since the introduction of ChatGPT, companies have been eagerly anticipating the day AI will turbocharge their workers and forever transform their businesses. Three years later, they're still waiting. Why? And what's the fix? These two questions dominated pretty much every single conversation I had with executives in Davos last week — including a Business Insider roundtable I moderated with 15 chief people officers and other senior executives. One explanation that came up again and again was incomplete adoption among employees. Many professionals are understandably worried about what these tools will mean for their jobs, or at least skeptical of their usefulness as AI slop abounds. To bulldoze through this hesitation, bosses have stepped up the pressure, making AI use mandatory and incorporating it into performance reviews. But a number of executives at the roundtable advised against strong-arming. Cisco learned that the hard way. "When we asked our employees to take mandatory training for AI, not only did it not drive sustainable usage, it actually had a bit of a negative impact," said Francine Katsoudas, the company's chief people, policy, and purpose officer. What worked, she explained, was "providing choice" — like when Cisco gave its engineers access to half a dozen different AI tools, allowing them to decide which ones to use and how to use them. "They absolutely loved that," she said. Another theory was that even if employees want to use these new tools, they don't have the necessary skills to get the most out of them. Part of the fix, some argued, involves hiring people who are already good at using AI. Kyle Lutnick, the executive vice chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, said he wants to bring in more new college grads at a time when other businesses are hiring fewer of them, precisely because they have more fluency using these tools than their older counterparts. But hiring new blood won't be enough. Employers will need to do a lot more to train their existing workforces too. "Investment has been primarily on the technology and not so much on the people," said Elizabeth Faber, global chief people and purpose officer at Deloitte. "That needs to shift." A third explanation was that big productivity gains require a fundamental overhaul of the way work gets done inside companies. If the Googles or the Amazons of the world were to start from scratch today, they almost certainly wouldn't have the team structures, workflows, and job descriptions they currently do. I think that's why we're seeing the AI revolution most clearly right now in early-stage startups, which are starting from the ground up in the post-ChatGPT era. Kyle Lutnick, executive vice chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, said he wants to bring in more new college grads because they have more fluency using AI than their older counterparts. Riana Daehler "84% of work processes have been left in their legacy state when adopting AI and have not been redesigned," Faber said. "So 16% of organizations and work processes are really being developed in an AI-native way." All of these proposed solutions are far from quick fixes. Encouraging employees to opt in voluntarily takes more time than threatening to fire them. Training staff — and actually getting them to learn — takes time too. Redesigning jobs will prove to be an even heavier lift. Many large businesses don't even know what employees do on a day-to-day basis. It's painstaking work to build out a comprehensive database of the skills employees have and the tasks they perform — and then to systematically tease out which of them can be delegated to AI and which of them can't. One chief people officer I spoke to said that it'll take years for her HR department to complete that process across every function at her company. Once all that heavy-lifting is done, what will these businesses look like? I put the question to the group at the roundtable, asking how many of them expect their workforces to shrink in three to five years' time. Two out of the 15 raised their hands — a tally I suspect would have been higher if I weren't there. One of them, Gina Vargiu-Breuer, chief people officer at SAP, explained that her company is currently keeping headcount flat because the business is still growing. "But when you're not growing, then I think this is where you have to talk about, 'OK, do we have to reduce headcount?'" she said. "I have a lot of peers in German companies where they are starting to reduce headcount dramatically. So it's a reality. For us, it's not, because we're growing, but I think it will happen going forward." Even at SAP? I asked. "At the moment we stay flat," she said. "But if productivity goes up and growth is slowing down, then I think we have to look at that with different eyes." By the end of the week, I left Davos with a sense that a workplace truly reshaped by AI — one that would allow companies to run on meaningfully smaller teams — isn't coming as soon as I'd thought. Those days seem to be still several years away, given all the painstaking work businesses need to complete to get there. That's something many economists had predicted early on, given how difficult it has always been to fully integrate new technology into the workplace. They told me that things will change less than we expect in the short term, and a lot more in the long run. No matter how fast a technology advances, humans change less readily. C-suites around the world are coming to the same realization, which is probably why I detected quite a bit of frustration in Davos. Svenja Gudell, Indeed's chief economist, compared the world's urgency around AI to the impatience of a parent potty-training their kid. "It's messy, it's a long process," she said. "You're like, 'Why is this not happening? It's been three weeks already.'" Her message to executives: "Give yourself some grace." The slower timeline is good news for the rest of us — it gives us time to learn new skills, debate new public policies, and try to shape the future we actually want. But it would be a mistake to read the so-far modest changes as evidence that tectonic shifts aren't coming. I came away from Davos convinced that when they do happen, they'll be far bigger than anything we're imagining now, for better and for worse. Aki Ito is a chief correspondent at Business Insider. // Indeed const seriesTitle = ""; // Presented by const text = "Presented by"; // 6977990fe1ba468a96aab2e2?width=1441 const sponsorLogoID = "6977990fe1ba468a96aab2e2?width=1441"; // Indeed const altText = "Indeed"; // const hubOrCatURL = ""; document.documentElement.classList.add("gi-sponsor-module"); // Selectors and styles last updated: 6-5-25 if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && document.querySelector(".post-body") && !document.querySelector(".is-enhanced") ) { document.querySelector(".post-hero").insertAdjacentHTML( "afterend", ` ${seriesTitle} ${text} ` ); } if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && (document.querySelector("figure.as-full-bleed") || document.querySelector(".overlay-hero-image")) && document.querySelector(".is-enhanced") ) { document.querySelector(".timestamp").insertAdjacentHTML( "beforebegin", ` ${seriesTitle} ${text} ` ); } if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && document.querySelector(".breadcrumbs-wrapper") ) { document.querySelector( ".breadcrumbs-wrapper" ).innerHTML = ` ${seriesTitle} `; } Read the original article on Business Insider

9h
3 min
0
Read Article
Clawdbot is the new AI techies are buzzing about — and it's renewing interest in the Mac Mini
Technology

Clawdbot is the new AI techies are buzzing about — and it's renewing interest in the Mac Mini

A new AI agent has people buying up Mac Minis. Screenshots via @techfren, @nickvasiles, and @30float. Clawdbot is an AI agent that promises to manage your digital life, 24/7. Techies are buzzing as they hook up their calendars, text chains, and vibe-coding systems to the tech. Some AI fans are buying up Mac Minis to run Clawdbot. If your techie friend is texting a lobster, here's why. Clawdbot is an open-source AI agent that works around the clock and can connect to many common consumer apps. Users have asked their Clawdbots to organize their schedules, monitor vibe-coding sessions, and build new AI employees. It's scored some high-profile fans, from Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan to multiple Andreessen Horowitz partners. Many have praised it, others have meme'd it, and some have warned people about potential security concerns. What is Clawdbot? You can spot Clawdbot by its friendly lobster mascot. Founded by Peter Steinberger, Clawdbot is an AI agent that manages "digital life," from emails to home automation. Steinberger previously founded PSPDFKit. In a key distinction from ChatGPT and many other popular AI products, the agent is open source and runs locally on your computer. Users then connect the agent to a messaging app like WhatsApp or Telegram, where they can give it instructions via text. Clawdbot was named after the "little monster" that appears when you restart Claude Code, Steinberger said on the "Insecure Agents" podcast. He formed the tool around the question: "Why don't I have an agent that can look over my agents?" "I already did the whole startup thing," Steinberger said. "I'm just here to have fun." bro came back from retirement > built @clawdbot > solved "AI forgets everything" problem > and still gave it to us for free absolute legend 🐐 pic.twitter.com/tPwwicah42 — Karthik (@karthikponna19) January 25, 2026 Clawdbot runs locally on your computer 24/7. That's led some people to brush off their old laptops. "Installed it experimentally on my old dusty Intel MacBook Pro," one product designer wrote. "That machine finally has a purpose again." Others are buying up Mac Minis, Apple's 5"-by-5" computer, to run Clawdbot. Logan Kilpatrick, a product manager for Google DeepMind, posted: "Mac mini ordered." It could give a sales boost to Apple, some X users have pointed out — and online searches for "Mac Mini" jumped in the last 4 days in the US, per Google Trends. https://trends.google.com/explore?q=Mac%20Mini&date=today%201-m&geo=US But Steinberger said buying a new computer just to run the AI isn't necessary. "Please don't buy a Mac Mini," he wrote. "You can deploy this on Amazon's Free Tier." Engineers and AI heads seem to love it The Mac Mini buy-ups have spawned dozens of memes. One founder wrote that his "meal prep" was a fridge full of Mac Minis and Monster energy drinks. An engineer joked that his Mac Mini had quit his job and divorced his wife. Another founder prophesied a wave of Mac Mini returns in two weeks. getting a mac mini just to run clawd has got be most performative thing you can do to start the year pic.twitter.com/KwTYIEcJqI — Tommy Thomas (@0xTommyThomas) January 26, 2026 As for Clawdbot, many techies were excited by the agent's capabilities. One founder asked it to make him a dinner reservation; when it couldn't complete the task via OpenTable, it used its ElevenLabs skill to call the restaurant. "AGI is here and 99% of people have no clue," he wrote. Others were less impressed. One founder called it a "generational psyop," joking that it took him 6 texts to get a calendar invite. Clawdbot seems to be at least moderately popular. Steinberger posted on X that he had 89 GitHub pull requests — and that venture capitalists were flooding his inbox. What's the worry? Is Clawdbot the future of agents? Some onlookers seem skeptical. First, the setup process can be technical. A16z partner Olivia Moore described the process, from terminal commands to API keys. "For most consumers (or even prosumers), the learning curve is likely too steep," she wrote. Then there's the security question. You are giving an AI agent almost unlimited access to your digital life and passwords, after all. Rahul Sood, a former Microsoft exec who founded its investment arm, wrote that Clawdbot turned text messages into "attack surfaces" and had "zero guardrails by design." He advised using it carefully. Gave Clawdbot access to my portfolio. "Trade this to $1M. Don't make mistakes" 25 strategies. 3,000+ reports. 12 new algos. It scanned every X post. Charted every technical. Traded 24/7. It lost everything. But boy was it beautiful. pic.twitter.com/wYpEZ3kB67 — Kevin Xu (@kevinxu) January 26, 2026 One hacker described Clawdbot as hiring a "brilliant" butler who later opened your home to the public, allowing a stranger to read your diary. Steinberger responded to these security concerns by outlining some guardrails users could employ, including reading the security document and avoiding adding Clawdbot to group chats. How much should we hand over our digital lives to AI? A16z partner Justine Moore warned against being the "guy who automated his entire life with ClawdBot." Read the original article on Business Insider

10h
3 min
0
Read Article
Economics

Think the Paris Agreement failed? Here's what it actually achieved

Major emitter the US has officially left the Paris Agreement and global emissions keep rising a decade on from the deal. Yet renewables' growth shows climate action can work. Here's what's been done and what's missing.

10h
3 min
0
Read Article
Economics

Paris Agreement 10 years on: More wins than you may realize

Major emitter the US has officially left the Paris Agreement and global emissions keep rising a decade on from the deal. Yet renewables' growth shows climate action can work. Here's what's been done and what's missing.

10h
3 min
0
Read Article
Over 80% of every battlefield hit against Russia is now being carried out by a drone, Zelenskyy says
Politics

Over 80% of every battlefield hit against Russia is now being carried out by a drone, Zelenskyy says

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that the overwhelming majority of the drones used to strike Russian targets are now manufactured locally. YURIY DYACHYSHYN/AFP via Getty Images Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says 80% of Ukrainian strikes are now using drones. It's one of the highest official estimates of the extent of drone involvement in the war. Zelenskyy's office said Ukraine struck 820,000 targets with drones last year. At least four out of every five successful Ukrainian strikes against Russia's forces are being carried out by drones, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday. The new figure represents one of the highest official estimates of the involvement of drones in Ukraine's battlefield operations. In the spring of 2025, Ukrainian officials had said that roughly 70% of Russian casualties were inflicted by drones. Speaking at an awards event for Ukrainian drone units, Zelenskyy said that the "overwhelming majority" of these drones were manufactured locally. In a statement, Zelenskyy's office said that in 2025, Ukrainian troops had struck nearly 820,000 targets with drones. "Each of these strikes is recorded, which helps not only with hit verification but also with the operation of the bonus-based system for assessing military performance," the statement said, referring to a new system that rewards drone squads for video-recording their battlefield engagements. For every confirmed kill, drone units are assigned points that can be used to procure equipment. Zelenskyy said that infantry and artillery were still important in the war, but "everything is becoming extremely dependent" on how quickly Kyiv can adapt and build new technologies. "Our bonus-based electronic points system is working to scale up the results of our defense. In December, our units achieved a result of 35,000 neutralized occupiers," the Ukrainian leader said. Ukrainian units that regularly report their battlefield performance have also suggested similar tallies for December. Maj. Robert "Madyar" Brovdi, the commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, said on Sunday that his units were responsible for a third of Ukraine's battlefield hits with drones, and had wounded or killed a daily average of 388 Russian soldiers in December. That roughly translates to 34,900 casualties for the month. Mykhailo Fedorov, who is now Ukraine's defense minister, previously said that he estimated up to 90% of battlefield kills in August could be attributed to drones. He was serving as minister for digital transformation at the time. Ukraine aimed last year to manufacture roughly 2.5 million first-person-view drones, though some local estimates have also said it could target a capacity of up to 4.5 million. Officials have not said how many such drones were actually produced in 2025. Kyiv has sought to aggressively expand and export its local drone manufacturing sector, and hopes to wean itself and the international market off Chinese products and parts. Read the original article on Business Insider

11h
3 min
0
Read Article
EU and India seal trade deal
Economics

EU and India seal trade deal

Pact will reduce or phase out levies on cars, alcohol and machinery while protecting some agricultural products

11h
3 min
0
Read Article
Technology

Big Tech’s AI data center push is spawning a new heat economy

AI’s energy problem may also be its solution, as cities are increasingly exploring opportunities to repurpose excess heat from data centers.

11h
3 min
0
Read Article
India and EU set to announce landmark trade deal
Economics

India and EU set to announce landmark trade deal

The long-awaited deal comes as both Delhi and Brussels contend with economic and geopolitical pressure from the US.

12h
3 min
0
Read Article
Sen. Marshall to cut card fees provision in crypto bill markup: Report
Cryptocurrency

Sen. Marshall to cut card fees provision in crypto bill markup: Report

Senator Roger Marshall filed an amendment to the market structure bill last week that would force companies to compete on swipe fees.

12h
3 min
0
Read Article
Why Starbucks is letting Brian Niccol use the company plane for more personal travel
Lifestyle

Why Starbucks is letting Brian Niccol use the company plane for more personal travel

Starbucks is encouraging its CEO, Brian Niccol, to use the company jet for all his personal travel. Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images for Fast Company Starbucks is getting its CEO to fly on its private jet for all his travel — work and personal. Starbucks decided on this after reviewing threats and risks to Niccol's safety, a spokesperson said. His annual travel budget cap of $250,000 has also been removed. Starbucks is getting CEO Brian Niccol to use the company jet for all his travels — and removing his quarter-million travel budget cap. In a Monday filing, the Seattle-based coffee chain said that it was changing its agreement on how much Niccol could use the company's private jet for his personal travel. And the main reason for this change is to ensure Niccol's safety. Before September, Niccol's use of the Starbucks plane for non-work reasons was subject to an annual cap of $250,000, and if he exceeded that amount, he had to reimburse the company, the Monday filing wrote. But after September, the board removed the $250,000 annual cap and replaced it with a "more frequent quarterly review of Mr. Niccol's personal flights by the chair of the Compensation Committee," per the filing. Starbucks has not imposed a new maximum spending limit. "This change was driven by the security study's recommendation that Mr. Niccol use Company aircraft for all air travel, including personal travel, and the Company's ongoing monitoring of Mr. Niccol's security situation," the filing wrote. A Starbucks spokesperson said the company's board recently decided to enhance security measures for Niccol, following a review of threats and risks to the chief executive. Following the review, the board has made it a requirement to use private aircraft for all his travels, the spokesperson added. Last year, Starbucks was hiring for a pilot to fly its private Gulfstream jets. In the job listing, the company said it would pay the pilot a salary between $207,000 and $360,300. The filing also wrote that Niccol was paid about $31 million in compensation in 2025, a drop from the $95.8 million he was paid in 2024. His 2024 compensation was boosted by $90.2 million in stock awards he received as part of his signing contract. Niccol started at the company in September 2024, moving over from Chipotle. He has helmed the chain's "Back to Starbucks" turnaround plan, an effort to turn around several quarters of poor results because of a declining customer experience. His offer letter in August 2024 showed that Starbucks had permitted him to use the company jet to commute from his home in California to the company's headquarters in Seattle. In July last year, Business Insider learnt that Starbucks had set up a satellite office close to Niccol's residence in Newport Beach. Read the original article on Business Insider

12h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Volver al inicio