Key Facts
- ✓ XREAL has filed a lawsuit against Viture in a US federal court in Texas, alleging patent infringement on several of Viture's smart glasses models.
- ✓ A German court has already issued a preliminary injunction against Viture, freezing sales of its Pro, Luma, and Luma Pro models in Germany.
- ✓ The German sales freeze could potentially extend to nine other European countries, including France, Italy, and Spain.
- ✓ XREAL claims to hold over 800 patents and applications worldwide, while alleging Viture holds fewer than 70 with none in the US or Europe.
- ✓ Viture has denied the infringement claims, calling the patent 'weak and questionable,' and announced it is taking its own legal action in response.
- ✓ At CES 2026, XREAL unveiled new products including the ROG X R1 AR glasses developed in partnership with ASUS.
Quick Summary
A significant legal dispute has emerged in the augmented reality hardware space, pitting two major smart glasses manufacturers against each other. XREAL, a prominent player in the industry, has initiated legal proceedings against rival Viture in a United States federal court.
The lawsuit centers on allegations of patent infringement, with XREAL claiming that Viture has illegally incorporated its proprietary technology into several of its popular product lines. This move represents a critical escalation in a competitive market, with XREAL framing the action as a necessary defense of intellectual property and innovation integrity.
The Legal Complaint
The lawsuit was officially lodged in a federal court in Texas, marking the beginning of a high-stakes legal battle. XREAL's complaint specifically targets Viture's Luma Pro, Luma Ultra, and Beast models, alleging these devices contain technology protected by XREAL's patents.
In a formal press release, XREAL articulated the broader implications of the case, stating that the action extends beyond a single patent dispute. The company emphasized its commitment to protecting the ecosystem of innovation within the technology sector.
The lawsuit is not merely about enforcing a single patent. It is about stopping a pattern of intellectual property infringement that undermines the integrity of innovation and endangers continued technological development in this industry.
This legal challenge highlights the intense competition in the AR/VR space, where companies are racing to develop and protect cutting-edge display technologies that connect to smartphones and laptops for gaming, media consumption, and productivity tasks.
"The lawsuit is not merely about enforcing a single patent. It is about stopping a pattern of intellectual property infringement that undermines the integrity of innovation and endangers continued technological development in this industry."
— XREAL, Press Release
International Sales Impact
The legal conflict is not confined to the United States. XREAL has already achieved a significant preliminary victory in Germany, where it secured an injunction against Viture. This German court order has resulted in a sales freeze for specific Viture products within that country.
The ramifications of this German injunction could extend far beyond its borders. XREAL indicated that the sales freeze has the potential to spread to nine other European nations, including major markets such as France, Italy, and Spain. The injunction specifically affects Viture's Pro, Luma, and Luma Pro smart glasses.
Both companies produce augmented reality glasses with built-in displays, offering similar specifications that are critical for user experience, including display resolution and field of view. The overlapping product features underscore the competitive nature of the market.
Viture's Response
In response to the lawsuit, Viture has issued a strong denial of the allegations, asserting that its products do not infringe on the cited patent. The company has challenged the validity of XREAL's claims, suggesting the patent in question is fundamentally flawed.
Our product does not infringe upon the cited patent in any way. We encourage everyone to look closely at the patent itself and form their own judgment, it becomes clear very quickly how weak and questionable it is.
Viture also addressed claims made by XREAL regarding sales restrictions, labeling them as misinformation. The company stated that XREAL had circulated false claims suggesting Viture is "banned across nine European countries," which Viture asserts is entirely untrue. In a notable development, Viture announced it is taking legal action of its own in response to XREAL's public statements.
Patent Portfolios & Market Position
The lawsuit may signal the beginning of a broader conflict in the AR/VR industry. The language used in XREAL's press release suggests this case could be a prelude to similar legal actions against other competitors.
A significant disparity exists between the two companies' intellectual property holdings. XREAL claims to hold over 800 patents and patent applications worldwide covering AR, VR, and related technologies. In contrast, XREAL alleges that Viture holds fewer than 70 patents, with none registered in the United States or Europe.
Meanwhile, XREAL continues to expand its product lineup, having recently unveiled several new devices at CES 2026. Among the announcements was the ROG X R1 AR glasses, developed in collaboration with technology giant ASUS, signaling the company's ongoing investment in the sector.
Looking Ahead
The legal battle between XREAL and Viture is poised to be a defining moment for the smart glasses industry. The outcome of the US lawsuit, combined with the existing injunction in Germany and potential European sales restrictions, could reshape the competitive landscape.
This case underscores the critical importance of intellectual property protection in the fast-evolving AR/VR market. As both companies continue to innovate and release new products, the industry will be watching closely to see how this dispute influences future collaborations, product development, and market dynamics.
"Our product does not infringe upon the cited patent in any way. We encourage everyone to look closely at the patent itself and form their own judgment, it becomes clear very quickly how weak and questionable it is."
— Viture, Statement










