Trump: Hamas Must Disarm or Face Swift Action

The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, has long been a stage for global economic discussions. However, on January 21, 2026, the venue became the backdrop for a significant geopolitical warning. The US President utilized the high-profile platform to address the ongoing conflict involving Hamas, delivering a message of uncompromising finality.

Speaking to attendees, the President outlined a clear and urgent timeline for the militant group. The statement marked a notable escalation in rhetoric, moving from diplomatic negotiation to a direct threat of force. The context of the forum, which gathers world leaders and financial elites, amplified the weight of the declaration.

The core of the message was a demand for disarmament. The President indicated that the window for compliance is rapidly closing, setting the stage for potential international military action. This development comes amid ongoing efforts to stabilize the region, though the specifics of the proposed action remain undefined.

The central point of the President's address was a non-negotiable requirement for Hamas to surrender its arms. He stated that the group must do so in the coming weeks, establishing a firm deadline for compliance. This timeline suggests an imminent and decisive phase in the international community's approach to the group.

Crucially, the President claimed that Hamas has already given its assent to these terms. He asserted, "That's what they've agreed to, they're going to do it." This assertion introduces a narrative of prior agreement, framing the current situation as a matter of follow-through rather than initial negotiation.

The language used was direct and devoid of diplomatic ambiguity. The phrase "blown away very quickly" suggests a swift and overwhelming response should the deadline pass without disarmament. This terminology underscores the seriousness with which the administration views the situation.

"That's what they've agreed to, they're going to do it."

Beyond the direct warning to Hamas, the President highlighted the breadth of international support for this stance. He claimed that a coalition of 59 countries is prepared to take collective action. This number suggests a significant level of global consensus, should the need for intervention arise.

The stated objective of this coalition is to "come in and take out" the terror group. This phrasing implies a coordinated military operation rather than unilateral action. The involvement of dozens of nations would represent a substantial international effort, potentially involving logistical, financial, and military contributions.

While the specific nations comprising this coalition were not named, the claim positions the potential action as a unified global response. This framing aims to isolate Hamas diplomatically and militarily, presenting the disarmament demand as the will of a broad international alliance rather than a single nation's policy.

• 59 countries allegedly aligned for potential action
• Objective is to "take out" the terror group
• Coalition support suggests broad international consensus

The choice of the Davos forum for this announcement was strategically significant. The World Economic Forum is traditionally an arena for discussing markets, trade, and economic policy. Introducing a stark security ultimatum in this setting shifts the focus toward geopolitical risk and stability.

Attendees at Davos include heads of state, central bankers, and corporate CEOs. A declaration of this nature sends ripples through global markets, affecting investor confidence and economic forecasts. The potential for a new military conflict in the Middle East carries significant implications for energy prices and global supply chains.

By speaking at Davos, the President ensured the message reached a global audience instantly. The forum's media presence guarantees that the statement is disseminated widely, influencing public opinion and diplomatic channels simultaneously. It transforms a regional security issue into a topic of immediate global economic concern.

The ultimatum places immense pressure on the already volatile situation in the region. A failure to disarm by Hamas would likely trigger a significant military response, potentially involving multiple nations. Such an escalation carries the risk of widespread conflict and humanitarian crisis.

The President's confidence in the group's compliance, based on his claim of prior agreement, suggests that back-channel negotiations may have occurred. However, the public nature of the deadline leaves little room for maneuvering. Any deviation from the stated path could be interpreted as a breach of trust, justifying the threatened action.

The international community now watches closely to see how Hamas responds. The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether the group adheres to the demand or if the coalition of 59 nations proceeds with its stated plan. The situation remains fluid, with the potential for rapid and dramatic changes.

The stage is set for a decisive period in the conflict. The US President has articulated a clear red line: Hamas must disarm within weeks. The threat of being "blown away very quickly" serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of non-compliance.

The claimed support of 59 nations adds a layer of international legitimacy to the threat, suggesting that any action taken would not be isolated. This coalition approach aims to present a united front, making it more difficult for Hamas to find diplomatic or military allies.

Ultimately, the focus now shifts to Hamas and its leadership. Their response to this ultimatum will determine the next phase of the conflict. Whether through disarmament or confrontation, the coming weeks promise to bring a significant resolution to the current stalemate.