SNCF's 'No-Kids' Wagon Controversy Echoes 1980s History
Lifestyle

SNCF's 'No-Kids' Wagon Controversy Echoes 1980s History

The SNCF's recent announcement of a child-free wagon on the Paris-Lyon line has ignited controversy. However, a look back at the 1980s reveals a surprising history of dedicated children's spaces on French railways.

Le Figaro2h ago
5 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1The SNCF recently announced a new category of wagon reserved for passengers over twelve years old on the Paris-Lyon line.
  • 2This move has been accused of fueling the 'no kids' trend, sparking public debate.
  • 3However, 44 years ago, the railway company proposed spaces specifically reserved for children.
  • 4The historical contrast highlights a significant shift in how family travel is perceived and managed.

A Modern Controversy

The French national railway company, SNCF, has recently found itself at the center of a heated public debate. The catalyst for this discussion was the announcement of a new initiative on the Paris-Lyon line: a category of wagon reserved exclusively for passengers over the age of twelve. This decision has been swiftly criticized by some who argue it fuels the controversial 'no kids' trend, a movement advocating for child-free zones in public spaces.

This contemporary controversy, however, is not without historical precedent. In a striking contrast to the current policy, the railway offered spaces specifically reserved for children 44 years ago. This historical footnote provides a fascinating lens through which to view the evolving relationship between public transportation, family travel, and societal expectations over the decades.

The 1980s Approach

Looking back to the 1980s, the SNCF operated under a different philosophy regarding young passengers. Rather than segregating children to ensure quiet for other travelers, the railway actively created dedicated spaces for them. These areas were designed to be welcoming and suitable for families, acknowledging the presence of children as a normal part of the travel experience.

This approach reflected a different set of priorities for public transport at the time. The focus was on accommodation and integration rather than separation. The existence of these child-friendly zones demonstrates that the railway's policies have undergone a significant transformation over the last four and a half decades.

  • Designated areas for children to play and sit
  • Family-oriented amenities and considerations
  • A philosophy of integration over segregation
  • Recognition of children as a key passenger demographic

A Shift in Perspective

The journey from providing child-centric spaces in the 1980s to creating adult-only zones today marks a profound shift in the SNCF's operational and social outlook. The current proposal for the Paris-Lyon line suggests a growing emphasis on passenger comfort defined by quiet and an absence of child-related noise. This has led to accusations that the company is prioritizing the comfort of some passengers over the inclusivity of all.

The debate touches on broader societal questions about public space and family life. While the 1980s model assumed a shared space where children were accommodated, the modern approach explores the possibility of separation. This evolution mirrors changing social dynamics and expectations for travel comfort in the 21st century.

There is a clear tension between creating peaceful environments for all travelers and ensuring that families with children are not marginalized in public transport.

The 'No Kids' Trend

The term "no kids" has become a flashpoint in modern travel discourse. It refers to the growing demand for adult-only spaces, from flights to hotels and now, potentially, trains. Proponents argue that such spaces are necessary for those seeking a peaceful journey, free from the disruptions that can sometimes accompany young children. The SNCF's announcement is seen by critics as an endorsement of this trend.

However, this trend often clashes with principles of inclusivity. Opponents argue that public services, like railways, should be accessible and welcoming to everyone, regardless of age. The historical example of the SNCF's child-friendly wagons serves as a reminder of a time when the focus was on making travel work for families, rather than excluding them for the comfort of others.

  • Increased demand for quiet, adult-only zones
  • Debates over inclusivity versus specialized comfort
  • Impact on family travel logistics and costs
  • Reflection of broader societal shifts in public space norms

Echoes of the Past

The current situation with the SNCF is a powerful example of how history can inform present-day debates. The fact that the same railway company once championed the opposite approach—creating spaces specifically for children—adds a rich layer of context. It shows that policies are not static; they evolve with changing societal values, economic pressures, and passenger feedback.

This historical parallel invites a deeper consideration of the future of travel. As the SNCF moves forward with its plans for the Paris-Lyon line, the memory of its 1980s policies serves as a benchmark. It prompts questions about what has been gained and what might have been lost in the pursuit of a quieter, more segregated travel experience.

Looking Ahead

The controversy surrounding the SNCF's new wagon category highlights a fundamental tension in modern public life. The desire for personal comfort and quiet often exists alongside the need for inclusive, family-friendly public spaces. The railway's historical shift from accommodating children to potentially separating them underscores the complexity of balancing these competing needs.

As this debate continues, the SNCF's decision will likely be watched closely by other transport providers and the public alike. The outcome may set a precedent for how transportation networks worldwide navigate the delicate balance between individual comfort and collective inclusivity in an increasingly diverse society.

Frequently Asked Questions

The SNCF has announced a new category of wagon reserved exclusively for passengers over the age of twelve. This initiative is intended to create a quieter environment for travelers on this specific route.

The policy has been criticized for allegedly supporting the 'no kids' trend, which advocates for child-free spaces in public areas. Critics argue this could marginalize families and make travel more difficult for parents with young children.

This new policy contrasts sharply with practices from 44 years ago, when the SNCF actually provided spaces specifically reserved for children. This historical detail highlights a major shift in the company's approach to accommodating young travelers.

The debate touches on larger societal questions about inclusivity, public space, and the balance between adult comfort and family needs. It reflects ongoing tensions in how modern societies accommodate different demographic groups in shared environments.

#Enfants

Continue scrolling for more

I moved away from my family in my 30s. When I called crying, my dad dropped everything and came to see me.
Lifestyle

I moved away from my family in my 30s. When I called crying, my dad dropped everything and came to see me.

Ruth Davis's dad dropped everything and went to visit her when she needed him. Courtesy of Ruth Davis Ruth Davis is a 39-year-old mom who moved two hours away from her family in 2019 for work. Leaving her dad was harder than she expected. Although Ruth doesn't regret her move, she wouldn't advise her daughter to make the same one. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Ruth Davis, a Creative Director in LA. It has been edited for length and clarity. In 2019, I relocated with my 12-year-old daughter and fiancé to Los Angeles, which is two hours away from the "family village" where I had grown up. All my family — siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents — all lived within 15 minutes of each other. I knew it was going to be a hard move for our nuclear family unit, but I was convinced LA was the right place for us to be. I didn't fully understand the impact it would have on me. My dad is my everything It was my dad whom I immediately felt I had lost. Before we moved, my dad was everything to me. He and my mom had split when I was young, so my dad had full custody. It was just the two of us all the time. When I had my daughter, my dad moved in with us and was there to help with all the practical aspects of raising a child. But he was also just there as emotional support for me. He made me complete. After we moved, we only saw him once a month, when he'd take the train to visit us. I missed him and felt overwhelmed without him. In August 2025, I was grieving the loss of two family members, feeling overwhelmed with sadness, but also with life in general. I remember sitting on my bed, losing it, crying. I called him, crying My daughter was knocking on the door, asking me when we were leaving the house — we were going out for the day. I snapped at her. I couldn't leave the bed. I wanted to show up for her in that moment, but couldn't. In that moment, I felt like a failure compared to my dad. He had lived through so much grief and so many hard times, and yet I never knew because he managed to hold everything together. All I could think to do was to call my dad, crying as he answered. He listened to me and then told me he would call me right back. "Everything is going to be OK," he said before hanging up. Dad has never been a "words" person. Not too long after, he called back and told me he had been to the train station to buy a train ticket to come visit the next day. Knowing he was coming felt like a double-edged sword. I felt incredibly lucky to have a dad who would come and see me at the drop of a hat, but I also felt self-doubt because my elderly dad could get it together, but I couldn't. The next morning, when I knew my dad was on the train, bound for my house, I was certain everything would be OK. My dad was coming. With him, life feels normal and complete. I won't advise my daughter to move away I don't regret the wonderful changes the move afforded me and the position in life it put my nuclear family and me in. But had I known not seeing my dad every day would wreck me as it has, I don't know if I would have done it the same way. I had bought into the modern idea that decisions should always be made with the nuclear family in mind, but the distance from him made me realize how much I emotionally value my dad in ways I didn't think imaginable. Knowing what I know now, I would never advise my daughter to move away from her village, even if it means she'll move closer to a partner's village, as I did. I think as a mother, I did her a disservice by moving her away from my family, her tight-knit community. Read the original article on Business Insider

10m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home