M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Pixel Phone 'Take a Message' Bug Exposes User Audio
Technology

Pixel Phone 'Take a Message' Bug Exposes User Audio

9to5Google2h ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ The 'Take a Message' feature was introduced to the Pixel Phone app last year to automatically handle missed or declined calls.
  • ✓ A very small number of users have encountered an issue where the feature sends their audio to the caller instead of just taking a message.
  • ✓ The feature is designed to provide a digital alternative to voicemail by managing calls that a user does not answer.
  • ✓ The reported bug represents a rare malfunction in an otherwise automated call-handling system.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. The Feature in Question
  3. The Reported Issue
  4. Privacy Implications
  5. User Impact & Scope
  6. Looking Ahead

Quick Summary#

A privacy-focused feature on Google's Pixel phones is reportedly malfunctioning for a select group of users. The 'Take a Message' function, designed to automatically handle missed or declined calls, is unexpectedly transmitting user audio to callers.

This rare bug, which affects a very small number of users, raises significant privacy questions about the reliability of automated call-handling systems. While the feature was intended to provide a seamless way to manage communications, this glitch exposes a potential vulnerability in how personal audio data is handled.

The Feature in Question#

The Take a Message feature was introduced to the Pixel Phone app last year as a convenience tool. Its primary function is to automatically manage calls that a user either misses or actively declines, providing a digital alternative to voicemail.

When a call goes unanswered, the feature can step in to handle the interaction. The intended purpose is to allow the caller to leave a message without the user needing to engage directly with the call. This automation is meant to streamline communication for users who are busy or unavailable.

Key aspects of the feature's design include:

  • Automatic handling of missed callsManagement of declined calls
  • Providing a message-taking interface for callers
  • Reducing the need for manual call screening

The Reported Issue#

The malfunction occurs when the 'Take a Message' feature, instead of simply allowing a caller to leave a message, begins transmitting the user's audio to the caller. This represents a significant deviation from the feature's intended operation.

Reports indicate that this issue is not widespread. The problem is described as affecting a very small number of users, suggesting it may be a rare software glitch rather than a systemic flaw affecting the entire user base. However, for those affected, the privacy implications are substantial.

The nature of the bug means that a user's private audio environment could be inadvertently broadcast to an incoming caller, even when the user has chosen to miss or decline the call. This unexpected data transmission is the core of the reported problem.

Privacy Implications#

When a call-handling feature unexpectedly transmits audio, it creates a serious privacy concern. Users expect that declining or missing a call will terminate the connection, not open an unintended audio channel.

This type of bug could expose sensitive conversations, background noise, or other private audio from the user's environment to the caller. The unexpected transmission occurs without the user's consent or awareness, undermining the trust placed in the device's communication tools.

The incident highlights the complexities of developing automated systems that interact with real-time communication channels. Even a rare bug can have significant consequences for user privacy in an era where digital assistants and automated features are increasingly common.

User Impact & Scope#

The scope of this issue appears to be limited. The problem is specifically noted as affecting a very small number of users, which indicates that the majority of Pixel phone owners using the 'Take a Message' feature are not experiencing this malfunction.

For the users who have encountered the bug, the experience is likely disruptive. The feature is designed to provide control over incoming calls, but the audio transmission issue removes that control and creates a potential privacy breach.

While the number of affected users is small, the existence of such a bug serves as a reminder for all users of automated call features to be aware of potential software vulnerabilities. It also underscores the importance of ongoing software updates and patches to address such rare but impactful issues.

Looking Ahead#

The reported issue with the 'Take a Message' feature illustrates the delicate balance between convenience and security in modern smartphone software. While the feature offers a valuable service for managing calls, this rare bug demonstrates how even well-intentioned automation can have unintended consequences.

For the small group of users affected, this bug represents a significant privacy lapse. It highlights the ongoing challenge for technology companies to ensure that new features are not only functional but also secure and reliable under all conditions.

As automated communication tools become more prevalent, incidents like this serve as critical learning opportunities for developers. Ensuring that these systems operate predictably and securely remains a top priority in the evolution of mobile technology.

#News

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
342
Read Article
Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.
Sports

Football is the biggest thing in America. Chuck Klosterman says that's going to change.

Big time football — like this month's college football championship — is the most dominant force in American culture. It won't always be that way, writer Chuck Klosterman argues in his new book. Set Number: X164821 TK1 Are you ready for some football? Trick question: America is always ready for more football. It's an appetite without end. But writer Chuck Klosterman, who just devoted a book to the sport, says football's dominance will ultimately be its undoing. The notion that football is the biggest force in American culture and entertainment is so ingrained and obvious that it almost seems like something not worth mentioning. Chuck Klosterman feels otherwise: The pop culture writer just devoted an entire book to the sport, and its meaning and importance. But Klosterman also argues that football won't always be the main thing — and that its overwhelming size and scale will be the thing that eventually undermines it. I talked to Klosterman about all of that, as well as topics like the impact of video games on the sport, and why he thinks paying college football players is good for now, and really damaging in the long run. You can hear our entire conversation on my Channels podcast. What follows are edited excerpts from our chat. Peter Kafka: What is the point of a book called "Football" in 2026? Chuck Klosterman: I have been obsessed with sports and football my entire life. And probably 20 years ago, I made an unspoken, abstract decision — at some point, I want to do a book that's just about sports. My initial idea was that it was going to be about basketball, but I realized that's crazy: If you're writing about something that's part of the culture, football is the sport. It's the only one. If someone said to you, "Explain the last half of the 20th century through some idea, some metaphor," football is the thing to pick. It might not be the case for the 21st century, but it is for the end of the 20th century. And it is for the world we live in right now. One of the big changes in sports — and definitely in football — recently is the legalization of sports betting. It's omnipresent. You seem ambivalent-to-positive about it, which is not where I thought you'd end up. CHUCK: Do I think that gambling in this legalized way is bad for society? I would say probably, for all of the predictable reasons — particularly because it's on your phone and you've put your [financial information] in, so the money does not seem real. Even if it was just a situation where you had to feed dollar bills into it, everything would change. You're taking something that's addictive for some people and marrying it to your phone, which is also addictive for some people. It seems like an obvious way to get in trouble. CHUCK: But for football, it is good. Because it adds a different context for conversation about it. When I have a conversation with other dads, we'll talk about sports a lot, and then there'll be this other conversation. About gambling. We're still technically talking about football, but this is a whole different thing. It has a different context, a different meaning. It says more about the person. Some could argue that it's a weird argument for gambling being good. But if we look at football as a form of entertainment, a distraction, something to consume, to occupy yourself — I think gambling does make it more interesting. This is the pitch from the entire sports gambling industry — it improves the game, it adds stakes, it makes it more interesting. You seem to agree. Certainly there are people who feel that way. I think a lot of people I know who do a lot of gambling, they have a sort of mixed feelings about it — I think it does bother them that suddenly the game seems meaningless if they're not gambling on it. But for me, as somebody who doesn't really put money into it, I find it a fascinating thing. Like: Indiana was an eight-and-a-half point favorite [in Monday's college football championship game]. They did not cover. But the meaning of eight-and-a-half points in a spread suggests that the gambling markets believe it will be a blowout. That's different than saying, "I think Indiana's gonna win easily." I find it to be much more intriguing than I would've thought. I was definitely against the idea of sports betting. Ideologically, I thought, "This is bad." And like I say, socially it probably is. But for each individual sport … You argue that football's grip on America will eventually collapse. How will that happen? Football is not just the most popular thing, or just too big to fail. It is too big to stop expanding. It has to constantly get bigger. The financial demands of it, the amount of revenue it has to make, can only go up. The NFL only operates from the position of "How can we stretch out further? Can we even swallow up all the other sports? Can we expand into Europe and all of these things?" And right now, that's a successful thing. The more they make, the more people consume, the more people spend on it —most importantly, the TV networks and streamers who need it. And the depth of caring is so deep. If football went away this fall for whatever reason, people will be like, "What am I gonna bet on? What is my life gonna be like? Who am I? What's my identity if I'm not a fan of this team?" You really saw this during COVID. "We're still playing college football. No one's in their classes, but we gotta play these games. We can't not play them." So it's really brittle, right? It's a system that has to keep going. But I think at some point there is going to be a change. Probably in advertising. It's not that advertising is going to disappear. It's just that what it costs to buy an ad during a football game … it's not going be worth the trade off. So let's say it gets to be a point when Fox or Amazon Prime, or whoever's carrying these games, renegotiates their NFL contract and for the first time, the number doesn't go up. Maybe even the number goes down. [That puts the] NFL's in this weird position — they have to take their best offer. Then the players will say, "There's no way we're going to take less money. There's no way we're going to start playing 22 games just because you're not making enough money from CBS. We're going to strike." Or the owners will be like, "We're going to lock the players out" [because they can't afford to pay them] — like what's happened with baseball. If that happened now, it would be this American calamity, where people would freak out. But as people have less and less of a personal relationship to the game when this happens in the future, they'll be like, "Well, that's an entertaining distraction. I can replace it with something else." Something has to be part of your life for it to be so important that you'll do whatever you can to keep it going. Why will fans have less of a relationship to football? The comparison I use is horse racing. In the 1920s, along with boxing and baseball, it was the biggest sport. And in the 1920s, the average person still had a real relationship to the culture of horses. They had a blue-collar job, and horses were still doing some of the labor. Or their dad had a horse farm. They definitely saw horses all the time. The horse was part of the world in which they lived. That is no longer the case. Now, horse racing is just for people who own horses and people who gamble on it. That's really all it is. My fear is that football's gonna put itself in a position where it's too big. Its tentacles reach too far. And people will say, "Well, I guess we'll choose something else." And when it collapses, something that size collapses hard. It kind of implodes on itself. I'm not one of these people [who complain about capitalism]. But I do think some of the problems of capitalism are easiest seen through sports leagues, which are smaller simulations of society. And what's happening with the way money operates in pro and college football, it seems precarious to me. The financial side's changing in an exponential way. And when society shifts, it's the big things that can't. They're not nimble. The small things can. Read the original article on Business Insider

49m
3 min
0
Read Article
We're siblings who built a 6-figure Turo business in under 2 years. We started with just our mom's car — here's how we scaled up.
Lifestyle

We're siblings who built a 6-figure Turo business in under 2 years. We started with just our mom's car — here's how we scaled up.

Mike and Darlene Person. Courtesy of JDM Whipz Siblings Michael Rumph and Darlene Person built JDM Whipz, a profitable Turo car rental fleet. JDM Whipz grew to 13 vehicles in Atlanta by reinvesting profits and focusing on customer service. Their experience highlights Turo business strategies, challenges, and the importance of planning. This as-told-to essay is based on conversations with Michael Rumph, 60, and Darlene Person, 61, siblings in metro Atlanta who run JDM Whipz, a 13-car Turo fleet. It has been edited for length and clarity. Darlene: For several years, my brother, Mike, and I talked about wanting to go into business together. We considered a few ideas but hadn't settled on one. In February 2022, we rented an Escalade from Turo for a family trip. Almost exactly a year later, we launched our own Turo business, JDM Whipz. By 2024, JDM Whipz was making six figures in profit. We were fascinated by how quickly and easily we'd rented a car from Turo Darlene: Mike dove into research, sending me videos and websites every week. We began meeting on Sundays to discuss launching a Turo business. By January 2023, we had registered the company, and in late February, we went live on Turo, securing our first booking on the same day. I'm a federal government employee, and I still work full-time. Most of my Turo work takes place in the evenings, when I prep cars after my day job. When we started, both of us were balancing full-time jobs. Mike: I'm an IT nerd with 37 years of experience in desktop support, server support, and project management. Now, I'm a full-time Turo project manager. Our first car was a 2016 Toyota Corolla Mike: The Corolla belonged to our mom, who died in June 2022. It's still on the platform; I just had the front end repainted and protective film added. From there, we purchased a 2017 Mazda, a 2017 Chevy Malibu, a 2017 Equinox, and a 2018 Equinox. By the end of our first year, we had 10 cars. We purchased eight with cash and used "creative financing" for the other two, purchasing them with 0% credit cards Today, we have 13 vehicles — we own 12 outright and have one payment on a 2019 Chrysler Pacifica. We've had five cars totaled in the past year, but because I hold a dealer's license and buy vehicles wholesale at auctions, we've been able to replace them and even come out ahead on insurance payouts. The price difference compared to traditional rental companies is huge Mike: Enterprise once quoted me $805 for an SUV from Friday to Sunday. Turo cost us $360 for four days and 600 miles when we rented that Escalade. Darlene: We listed mom's Corolla as a trial, but the first renter kept extending her trip week after week, and it ended up being 2.5 months total. The car was gone, and we had nothing to do, so we said, "Let's add another." From the start, we reinvested every dollar back into the business. That's how we grew to 10 cars in a year. We choose Turo's 60% protection plan: we keep 60%, Turo takes 40%, but our deductible is lower. Hosts can take up to 90% but risk a much higher deductible. Understanding that trade-off is important. Mike: Day-to-day, I'm checking cars in and out, cleaning, handling inspections, and keeping up with competition in the Atlanta market. I left my IT job last April after paying off all my debts. I was breathing and dreaming of Turo at work. Now it's my focus. Darlene: Atlanta is huge, so Mike covers the north side, and I handle the south. We've never had all 13 cars sitting at our homes at once, where we store them. Usually they're rented out, coming back for a day or two before heading out again. I've learned more about cars in these two and a half years than I ever imagined. Turo does national advertising, but we're also exploring our own marketing efforts Darlene: We're obsessed with customer service. Over the years, we've both complained about poor service elsewhere. When we started JDM Whipz, I told Mike, "I want people to feel valued." Our reviews consistently mention exceptional service, which is the most rewarding feedback we receive. Mike: I built JDMWhipz.com because Turo's search doesn't show business names. Our site lets visitors view our entire fleet in one place without having to search. When ready to book, they tap a link that takes them directly to Turo to complete the reservation process. The biggest challenge for new hosts is capital. Ideally, buy or own your first car outright. Read Turo's Terms of Service carefully to understand the responsibilities of both the host and the guest. Another challenge is time Darlene: Most people start Turo while working full-time. You need excellent planning and time management. We learned the hard way: clean a car as soon as it returns. Early on, we'd say, "I'll do it in the morning," and then get a 7 a.m. booking. At 5 a.m., with car washes closed, you're in the driveway scrubbing, photographing, and prepping the car. Now it's a habit: the car comes in, and it gets cleaned. Mike: Revenue now depends on the season and the vehicle. Our Corolla rents for $42 to $46 per day. Some cars earn $800 a month, while others earn $1,200 during peak season in Atlanta, which typically spans from March to September. We're still making six figures in profit a year. Our biggest advice: do your homework Darlene: Check Turo's website for rules, like no cars older than 12 years or with more than 130,000 miles when listed. Watch videos from Turo hosts on YouTube, but vet their advice. Don't be afraid to ask experienced hosts for guidance. Mike and I mentor people all the time; we love helping new hosts succeed. Our long-term goal is to become Atlanta's go-to personal car rental company. We're proud of what we've built — and even prouder to do it together as siblings. Read the original article on Business Insider

50m
3 min
0
Read Article
Politics

World Cup 2026: Could Europe drive a boycott?

Just as it did in Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022, politics is dominating the build up to World Cup 2026. Could discontent with Donald Trump in Europe see football heavyweights united behind such a cause?

51m
3 min
0
Read Article
Bordeaux Mayor Accepts Mediation Amid Budget Transparency Dispute
Politics

Bordeaux Mayor Accepts Mediation Amid Budget Transparency Dispute

Bordeaux Mayor Thomas Cazenave has accepted a court-proposed mediation to resolve a dispute with the opposition over budget transparency. The conflict centers on the refusal to disclose detailed expense and investment tables.

52m
5 min
0
Read Article
Bitcoin Policy Institute, Fedi, Cornell Study American Financial Pr...
Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Policy Institute, Fedi, Cornell Study American Financial Pr...

A collaborative research effort between the Bitcoin Policy Institute, Fedi, and Cornell University is set to explore American perspectives on financial privacy. The study arrives at a critical juncture as regulatory scrutiny intensifies.

1h
5 min
7
Read Article
Grants Frozen, Communities Left Paying the Price
Environment

Grants Frozen, Communities Left Paying the Price

In Sauget, Illinois, a community built for pollution, a $500,000 grant to monitor air quality was abruptly terminated. Now, residents are left with poor health and no proof of the source.

1h
6 min
12
Read Article
NonUSA App Tops Danish Store Amid Greenland Tensions
Politics

NonUSA App Tops Danish Store Amid Greenland Tensions

A boycott application has reached the number one position in Denmark's App Store, a development linked to recent political statements regarding Greenland's status.

1h
5 min
12
Read Article
How Permanent Is Trump's Assault on Climate Action?
Politics

How Permanent Is Trump's Assault on Climate Action?

From withdrawing from the Paris Agreement to banning offshore wind, President Trump has launched a comprehensive assault on climate policy. Yet, many of his moves are reversible, and his legislative record is sparse.

1h
5 min
12
Read Article
Trump Announces Greenland Framework After NATO Dispute
Politics

Trump Announces Greenland Framework After NATO Dispute

US President Donald Trump announced a framework for a Greenland agreement and abandoned threats to invade the Arctic island after a dispute with NATO allies.

1h
5 min
12
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home