Key Facts
- ✓ Marine Le Pen began a crucial appeal in Paris on January 13, 2026
- ✓ She was barred from public office over a conviction for misusing EU funds
- ✓ The appeal will determine if she can run in the 2027 presidential election
- ✓ Jordan Bardella is the National Rally's number two official
- ✓ Bardella would run in Le Pen's place if she is disqualified
Quick Summary
French far-right leader Marine Le Pen began a crucial appeal in Paris on January 13 that will determine whether she can run in the 2027 presidential election, after being barred from public office over a conviction for misusing EU funds.
The National Rally's number two Jordan Bardella said a court ruling against Le Pen 'would be deeply worrying for democracy,' but Le Pen's protégé also stands to gain from that happening--as he would run in her place.
⚖️ Legal Battle Begins in Paris
The appeal process commenced on January 13, 2026, in Paris, representing a decisive moment for the French political landscape. Marine Le Pen faces the possibility of being permanently barred from public office following her conviction for misusing European Union funds.
This legal challenge carries extraordinary weight as it directly impacts the 2027 presidential election. The court's decision will establish whether Le Pen can continue her political ambitions or if her career as a national candidate will be terminated.
The case centers on charges of misusing EU funds, a serious offense that has already resulted in her being disqualified from holding public office. The appeal represents her final legal avenue to overturn this prohibition.
"a court ruling against Le Pen 'would be deeply worrying for democracy'"
— Jordan Bardella, National Rally's number two
🎭 Political Succession Drama
The situation has created a complex dynamic within the National Rally party. Jordan Bardella, identified as the party's number two official, has emerged as both a vocal supporter and a potential beneficiary of Le Pen's legal troubles.
Bardella publicly expressed concern about the democratic implications of a ruling against Le Pen, stating: "a court ruling against Le Pen 'would be deeply worrying for democracy'." This statement positions him as a defender of Le Pen's political rights while simultaneously highlighting the stakes.
However, underlying this public support is a clear political reality: if Le Pen is disqualified, Jordan Bardella would be positioned to run in her place as the National Rally's presidential candidate. This creates an inherent tension between supporting Le Pen's appeal and the potential for personal political advancement.
📊 What's at Stake
The court's decision will have far-reaching consequences for multiple parties:
- Marine Le Pen's political future - Her ability to seek the presidency hangs in the balance
- The National Rally party - Must prepare either for Le Pen's continued leadership or a new candidate
- Jordan Bardella's career - Could become the party's standard-bearer in 2027
- French democratic process - The case raises questions about judicial decisions affecting electoral choices
The 2027 presidential election represents the culmination of Le Pen's decades-long effort to reshape French politics. A disqualification would mark a dramatic shift in the far-right movement's leadership.
🔍 Broader Implications
This case transcends individual political careers and touches on fundamental questions about the intersection of criminal justice and electoral democracy. The timing of the appeal, so close to the next presidential cycle, adds urgency to the proceedings.
The National Rally must navigate the challenge of maintaining party unity while preparing for potential leadership changes. Bardella's dual role as both supporter and potential successor exemplifies this delicate balancing act.
French voters will be watching closely as the judicial system determines whether one of the country's most prominent political figures can continue her pursuit of the presidency or if a new chapter must begin for the far-right movement.


