M
MercyNews
Home
Back
James Cameron Moves to New Zealand for 'Sanity'
Entertainment

James Cameron Moves to New Zealand for 'Sanity'

Business Insider5h ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ James Cameron, the director of Avatar and Titanic, was granted New Zealand citizenship in 2025 after years of travel between the two countries.
  • ✓ The filmmaker first visited New Zealand in 1994 when a flight to the South Pole was grounded due to ice conditions, leading to an unexpected exploration of Christchurch.
  • ✓ Cameron and his wife, Susie, purchased a farm in New Zealand in 2011 but maintained a trans-Pacific lifestyle until the COVID-19 pandemic prompted a permanent move in 2020.
  • ✓ The director cited the US response to the pandemic and the political climate as the primary reasons for his relocation, seeking a society that 'believes in science.'
  • ✓ Cameron is among several celebrities, including Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres, who have left the United States in recent years citing political or social reasons.

In This Article

  1. A Dream Fulfilled
  2. The Unexpected Detour
  3. Life Gets in the Way
  4. The Pandemic Catalyst
  5. A Society of Sanity
  6. Political Climate
  7. A Broader Trend
  8. Settling Down

A Dream Fulfilled#

For James Cameron, the decision to leave the United States wasn't about escaping to a tropical paradise, but rather seeking a sense of stability. The acclaimed filmmaker, known for directing blockbusters like Avatar and Titanic, has officially relocated to New Zealand, a move he described as essential for his mental well-being.

At 71 years old, Cameron has been granted New Zealand citizenship, marking the culmination of a dream that began more than three decades ago. While many might assume the stunning landscapes were the primary draw, Cameron has a much more pragmatic reason for his relocation.

I'm not there for the scenery. I'm there for the sanity.

The Unexpected Detour#

The filmmaker's connection to New Zealand traces back to a fortuitous delay in 1994. Cameron was en route to the South Pole when his flight was grounded due to hazardous ice conditions. This unexpected stop in Christchurch turned into an impromptu exploration of the region.

What began as a logistical inconvenience quickly transformed into a profound personal connection. Cameron found himself captivated by the country's unique blend of natural beauty, welcoming people, and distinct way of life.

During this visit, he made a personal commitment that would eventually shape his future.

  • Exploring the Christchurch area after flight cancellation
  • Falling in love with the local culture and scenery
  • Making a promise to return and live there someday

"I'm not there for the scenery. I'm there for the sanity."

— James Cameron, Filmmaker

Life Gets in the Way#

Following that initial visit, the idea of moving to New Zealand became a recurring topic in Cameron's life. When he and his now-wife, Susie, began their relationship, she was also open to the concept of eventually relocating to the South Pacific nation.

However, life's responsibilities and a thriving career in Hollywood delayed those plans. The couple settled down in Malibu and Santa Barbara, raising children and building a life in California. The dream of New Zealand remained, but it was postponed.

It wasn't until after the massive success of the Avatar franchise that the conversation resurfaced with serious intent. Cameron noted that they had agreed to make the move happen once their professional obligations allowed.

The Pandemic Catalyst#

The couple purchased a farm in New Zealand in 2011, establishing a foothold in the country. For years, they maintained a trans-Pacific lifestyle, traveling back and forth between the United States and New Zealand for work and family.

Their routine was abruptly interrupted in early 2020. After returning to the US for Christmas, the COVID-19 pandemic grounded international travel, leaving them stranded in America while their production unit remained in New Zealand.

Cameron described the effort to resume operations as moving mountains. The logistical challenges of restarting a film production during a global health crisis forced a pivotal decision. Rather than continuing the back-and-forth commute, the family committed to a permanent relocation.

By the time they settled in New Zealand permanently, the country had successfully managed the virus through high vaccination rates and cohesive public health strategies.

A Society of Sanity#

Cameron's move highlights a stark contrast between the two nations' approaches to public health and social cohesion. He expressed deep appreciation for New Zealand's collective attitude toward science and community responsibility.

The filmmaker pointed to the differences in how the two countries handled the pandemic as a defining factor in his decision. While the US struggled with polarization and skepticism, New Zealand implemented strategies that Cameron viewed as rational and effective.

He posed a rhetorical question regarding his choice, framing it as a decision between two fundamentally different societal models.

A place that actually believes in science, and is sane, and where people can work together cohesively to a common goal, or a place where everybody's at each other's throats, extremely polarized, turning its back on science, and basically would be in utter disarray if another pandemic appears?

Political Climate#

Cameron's dissatisfaction with the US extends beyond the pandemic response. In a separate interview with a New Zealand outlet, he criticized the political environment in the United States, specifically referencing the era of Donald Trump.

He described that period as "a turn away from everything decent." The constant media saturation of political figures was another source of frustration for the director.

He noted a distinct difference in media coverage between the two countries, preferring the New Zealand approach where such figures might appear on page three rather than dominating the front page. Cameron likened the constant exposure in the US to watching a car crash on repeat.

A Broader Trend#

Cameron is not the only high-profile figure to leave the United States for political or social reasons in recent years. A pattern of celebrity relocation has emerged, reflecting broader concerns about the country's direction.

Comedian Rosie O'Donnell announced her move to Ireland shortly before a presidential inauguration, stating she would consider returning only when equal rights are guaranteed for all citizens.

Similarly, talk show host Ellen DeGeneres and her wife, Portia de Rossi, relocated to the United Kingdom following election results in 2024, deciding to stay permanently after waking up to the news.

These moves underscore a growing sentiment among some public figures seeking environments they perceive as more stable and aligned with their values.

Settling Down#

James Cameron's relocation to New Zealand represents more than just a change of address; it signifies a prioritization of mental peace and societal stability over career convenience. Having spent decades building a legacy in Hollywood, the director is now focusing on his future in the Southern Hemisphere.

With citizenship secured and a farm established, Cameron has firmly planted his roots in a country he first discovered by chance. For the filmmaker, the journey from a stranded passenger in Christchurch to a permanent resident is a testament to following through on a long-held promise to himself.

"I made myself a promise. I'm going to come live here someday."

— James Cameron, Filmmaker

"People there are, for the most part, sane as opposed to the United States."

— James Cameron, Filmmaker

"There's something nice about the New Zealand outlets — at least they'll put it on page three. I just don't want to see that guy's face anymore on the front page of the paper."

— James Cameron, Filmmaker

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
342
Read Article
Chuck Klosterman: Why Football's Dominance Will Be Its Undoing
Sports

Chuck Klosterman: Why Football's Dominance Will Be Its Undoing

In his new book, pop culture writer Chuck Klosterman examines why football's current cultural supremacy contains the seeds of its own eventual collapse, citing financial pressures and changing fan relationships.

50m
7 min
6
Read Article
Siblings Built 6-Figure Turo Business in Under 2 Years
Lifestyle

Siblings Built 6-Figure Turo Business in Under 2 Years

Michael Rumph and Darlene Person transformed their mother's 2016 Toyota Corolla into a thriving Atlanta car rental empire, proving that strategic planning and family teamwork can create a lucrative side business.

51m
5 min
6
Read Article
Europe's World Cup 2026 Boycott Threat
Politics

Europe's World Cup 2026 Boycott Threat

As the 2026 World Cup approaches, political tensions are rising. European football heavyweights are considering a boycott over discontent with Donald Trump, mirroring past protests in Russia and Qatar.

52m
5 min
6
Read Article
Bordeaux Mayor Accepts Mediation Amid Budget Transparency Dispute
Politics

Bordeaux Mayor Accepts Mediation Amid Budget Transparency Dispute

Bordeaux Mayor Thomas Cazenave has accepted a court-proposed mediation to resolve a dispute with the opposition over budget transparency. The conflict centers on the refusal to disclose detailed expense and investment tables.

53m
5 min
6
Read Article
Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.
Politics

Whole milk is gross. I don't care what RFK says.

Whole milk, yuck. Getty Images; BI The government's latest dietary guidelines suggest people drink whole milk instead of low-fat. This matters a lot for school lunches, where whole milk will get top billing. But for the rest of us: Who actually prefers sludgy, thick whole milk over crisp skim? Yuck! I refuse the long arm of the government's reach into my refrigerator: I'm not drinking whole milk! And I readily accept that food is political, so the fact that the latest dietary guidelines from the US government — which say to drink whole milk instead of skim — are being seen as the latest political battle isn't a surprise. But there's something in the latest whole milk debate that is truly confusing to me. It's that … whole milk isn't very good? And I don't think many of us have felt we couldn't drink it because of government guidelines. We just don't like it! Whole milk as a win for freedom? Secretary of Health and full-fat dairy booster Robert Kennedy Jr. is a polarizing figure, so people are going to interpret this kind of video in a way that fits their worldview: 🥛 pic.twitter.com/QUeSfR7EC8 — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) January 15, 2026 The government is positioning this change as people being desperate to drink whole milk but feeling they weren't allowed to. That they were forced to settle for skim or 2% milk, and finally, thanks to the Trump administration, are allowed the verboten pleasures again. Here's MY beef: Whole milk is gross. Whole milk is too sludgy, too thick. It always kind of smells like it's on its way to turning sour. I find the white residue it leaves on the sides of a glass off-putting. Yuck. One-percent milk is crisp, drinkable, watery, cold, and refreshing. Great to drink on its own or as a bath for cereal. Personally, I think skim is too watery, and 2% too close to whole, but I accept those options as well. For me, it's not any fear of fat intake that has kept me from buying whole milk; it's that whole milk is stinky and gross. I should note here that the health benefits of whole vs. low-fat milk are a living, breathing debate. Whole milk has more saturated fat, which is potentially "bad," but it has more vitamins and enzymes or whatever, which are potentially "good." (Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist here, people! Don't trust me — do your own research.) If you're truly interested in learning more about the details of the health benefits of dairy, I suggest you read this instead of listening to me whine about my personal milk preference. Don't listen to me about healthy food choices; my doctor shook her head sadly and said "noooooo" when I told her what kinds of garbage I typically eat for dinner (yes, my cholesterol is high). For me, worrying about the milkfat content of my cereal is like worrying about which multivitamin brand to buy when I often go days without eating a fresh vegetable. I'm stuffing so many chemicals and processed garbage down my gullet on the reg that any kind of milk is the healthiest thing I'll consume by far. Robert F. Kennedy presents the new "Dietary Guidelines for Americans," which include favoring whole milk. Yuck. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Yes, I'm sure there are some of you out there who are adult whole milk fans and prefer it over skim. Like whole milk? Know that I see you, I accept you, and you are valid. It's fine to have a taste preference. But I simply don't believe there are throngs of adults out there who've been feeling forced to choke down 2% when they were dying for whole milk. You're a grownup! Buy whatever milk you like! Of course, the main point of the latest guidelines isn't really aimed at making suggestions to adults. The actionable part of the guidelines is that they inform the rules for federal food programs for kids, like the National School Lunch Program, which previously only allowed low-fat milk options. I don't really care if a kid prefers whole or skim milk with their sloppy Joe or PB&J — either option seems better to me than chocolate milk, which, according to my own elementary school children, is what everyone chooses at lunch anyway. If the government is going to start meddling more with school lunches, frankly, I'd welcome them to start with the abusive fee structure in some of the digital lunch payment systems that many districts have adopted. My kids' school uses a payment provider for lunches that charges a $3.50 fee every time you add money to your kid's account (and requires separate accounts per sibling). President Trump, please look into that. For me, I am not going to change my milk-drinking ways. I was raised in a 1% household. I will continue to buy 1% because it's delicious, and whole milk is gross, and Uncle Sam can't tell me what to do. Read the original article on Business Insider

55m
3 min
0
Read Article
Student-loan forgiveness for public servants is at risk under Trump's plan to ax cheaper monthly payments, Democratic lawmakers say
Politics

Student-loan forgiveness for public servants is at risk under Trump's plan to ax cheaper monthly payments, Democratic lawmakers say

Sen. Jeff Merkley raised concerns about ending the SAVE student-loan repayment plan. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images A group of Democratic lawmakers raised concerns with Trump's proposed settlement to eliminate the SAVE plan. They said that abruptly moving student-loan borrowers off of SAVE could put PSLF debt relief at risk. The department said borrowers would have a limited time to begin repayment once SAVE is gone. Millions of student-loan borrowers could soon be forced off a key repayment plan — and debt relief is on the line. On Thursday, a group of Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Jeff Merkley, Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Tim Kaine, led their colleagues in raising concerns regarding the Department of Education's proposed settlement to end the SAVE student-loan repayment plan. Over 7 million borrowers are enrolled in SAVE, which was created by former President Joe Biden and intended to give borrowers cheaper monthly payments with a shorter timeline to loan forgiveness. Litigation halted the plan in 2024, and President Donald Trump's administration recently announced a proposed settlement that would effectively eliminate the plan and require borrowers to transfer to an existing plan with higher payments. Trump's "big beautiful" spending legislation called for eliminating SAVE by 2028, and this settlement would accelerate that timeline. The lawmakers wrote in a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon that borrowers are likely to face "significant hurdles" switching to a new plan, and those enrolled in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program — which forgives student debt for government and nonprofit workers after 10 years — are at heightened risk. "Forcing these borrowers to transition out of SAVE with little guidance risks further lost time to debt relief and payment increases that could render continued public service untenable," the lawmakers wrote. Business Insider wants to hear about the challenges, successes, and unique experiences you're facing with your student loans. Do you have a story to share? Please fill out this form, and we'll be in touch. Read more of our student-loan coverage: Student-loan borrowers are gearing up for higher monthly payments after Trump moves to ax their affordable plan: 'I'm bracing for an astronomical bill' How Trump's big spending bill will overhaul repayment for millions of student-loan borrowers Student-loan borrowers behind on payments are getting a major break Borrowers have not received credit toward PSLF while on the SAVE forbearance. While resuming payments on a different income-driven repayment plan would count toward PSLF, the lawmakers wrote that transitioning millions of borrowers to a new plan in a short timeframe would be a significant administrative burden, and they requested that the Department of Education give borrowers at least six months to switch to a new plan before their next payment comes due. The department wrote in its press release that SAVE borrowers "will have a limited time" to select a new repayment plan. Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said in a statement at the time that "American taxpayers can now rest assured they will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for illegal and irresponsible student loan policies." A slew of changes is on the horizon for student-loan borrowers. While borrowers are still waiting for a court to approve the SAVE settlement, provisions of Trump's spending legislation — including new repayment plans and borrowing caps — are set to be rolled out beginning in July. Those changes come as over 5 million borrowers are in default on their student loans, following the Trump administration's resumption of collections in May 2025 after a five-year pause. The Education Department announced last week that it is temporarily pausing wage garnishment and tax refund seizures for defaulted borrowers. Still, Democratic lawmakers said in their letter that SAVE borrowers are at risk of defaulting should they face challenges transitioning to a new plan. "It is imperative the Department take every action possible to ensure the 7 million borrowers currently enrolled in SAVE are provided with the information and resources necessary to avoid delinquency or default in order to avoid an even bigger default crisis," they wrote. Read the original article on Business Insider

55m
3 min
0
Read Article
Israeli fire kills 11 in Gaza: Three journalists among the dead
Politics

Israeli fire kills 11 in Gaza: Three journalists among the dead

In Gaza on Wednesday, Israeli forces killed 11 Palestinians in multiple attacks, including a strike on a vehicle carrying three journalists documenting a new displacement camp. Since the ceasefire took effect on October 10, both sides have frequently accused each other of violating the agreement, Gabrielle Nadler reports.

56m
3 min
0
Read Article
Capitalism as we know it is having an identity crisis — and you're caught in the middle
Economics

Capitalism as we know it is having an identity crisis — and you're caught in the middle

Getty Images; Tyler Le/BI From Davos to Washington to America's high school classrooms, people are questioning the foundations of our economic system — and we at Business Insider are tracking what the fight over the future of capitalism means for your work, your wealth, and your world. Polls show Americans' trust in capitalism is falling fast, as daily life has grown more expensive and less secure. Our own recent survey of readers found that people are worried their wages aren't keeping up with their expenses, that housing feels out of reach, and that the whole system seems shaky. Many employers are leaning even more heavily into a capitalistic approach, deemphasizing loyalty and tenure in favor of ruthless meritocracy. Meanwhile, the US government has taken a more hands-on role in the economy, becoming a shareholder in several companies and upending its place in the capitalist system. As questions about the state of capitalism grow, leaders are pitching competing visions of the economy's future. President Trump told a room full of CEOs, executives, and media figures at Davos this week that the US is reshaping the rules to make sure the country comes out of this period of transition "bigger and better than before." Some are pushing for reform, like California governor Gavin Newsom, who called for a "rules-based, competitive" model at Davos. Others, like New York City's self-described socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani, want to rethink the system from the ground up — and have a lot of voters on board. While capitalism's future hangs in the balance, Business Insider is digging in. We're exploring how and why the system is being reshaped — by government policy, by companies, and by you. Tell us what you think about the future of capitalism. Test your own understanding. And stick with us as we track how this system is evolving in real time, and what it will look like next. Read the original article on Business Insider

57m
3 min
0
Read Article
Donald Trump backs down on Greenland
Politics

Donald Trump backs down on Greenland

Donald Trump says he is moving toward a deal on Greenland following discussions with NATO chief Mark Rutte. The US president had earlier declined to rule out the use of military force to acquire the territory from Denmark, a NATO member—a stance many experts warned could threaten the alliance’s cohesion. Ellen Gainsford reports.

58m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home